User talk:Digitalme

Archives: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]

lakeside Shopping Center

Could I still write an article about Lakeside Shopping Center? elopElop 00:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I write again Lakeside Shopping Center Please? elopElop 01:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, you can´t. Damn, you're really annoying. Nah, just lying... I'm not DigitalMe :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.117.89.35 (talk) 03:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lakeside Shopping Center (New Orleans)

How about someone revise or edit the Lakeside Shopping Center (New Orleans) and add more information.

Elop 23:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave a message in my talk page.

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Digitalme, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

-- Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Digitalme, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

GrooveDog 00:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning:Javascript security issue

Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add toolbox link because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs 00:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fencing Wikiproject?

Almost a year ago, I joined your vision of creating a fencing wikiproject [1]. after hearing about it from a friend Its been tagged as inactive, and after rediscovering the page today, I believe that it could possibly be revitalized. If you agree respond on my talk page. Many thanks, --Patar knight (talk) 03:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Playsforsure.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Playsforsure.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Guest9999 (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Job Karma

A tag has been placed on Job Karma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 01:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

userbox edit counter

hi. im a new user to wikipedia, and i just saw that you had a userbox saying how many edits you have. but i can figure out where i can see how many edits i have had. so if you could please reply and let me know id really appreciate it. Thanks! Jake (talk) 12:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the Day

Hi there, Digitalme! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 13:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes!

Finally some common sense. Thank you for this. I put palm to forehead when I saw this but was afraid to take it down. Good job. [2] Piratejosh85 (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of User:Digitalme/BigVandalWarning

User:Digitalme/BigVandalWarning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Use of commas in large numbers

Regarding your edit to replace a command with a space in a large number, please see the Wikipedia:MoS#Large numbers section of the manual of style. The use of commas to separate each 10³ is the standard usage on the English language Wikipedia. Thank you.—RJH (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. I was motivated by clarity. I think you'll agree that it is somewhat difficult to know whether the figure reads as "sixty thousand" or "sixty point zero zero zero" when rendered in the small typeface of the template (I had to go to the source of the page to be certain). I've put the luminosity into scientific notation instead. digital_me (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I don't seem to have any problem making it out. You might consider modifying the typeset configuration on your browser so that the appearance is clearer. Thanks.—RJH (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject
Colorado

United States
notice board

The year 2011 has brought many changes to the State of Colorado. Several users have asked us to reactivate WikiProject Colorado. We have a new Governor and other state officers, two new U.S. Representatives, many new state legislators, and a new Mayor of Denver. Many articles about Colorado need to be updated and many Colorado places, people, and organizations need new articles. Portal:Colorado needs some new featured articles.

Can you help us? Please see our list of some requested articles. If you would like to remain an active member of WikiProject Colorado, please leave me a message at User talk:Buaidh or e-mail me at Special:EmailUser/Buaidh. If you cannot help right now, you can go to inactive status and then reactivate your status later. Thanks for any help you can provide. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Wiknic

All Wikipedians are cordially invited to the Colorado celebration of the 2011 Great American Wiknic on June 25. We will meet Saturday afternoon from 3:00 to 5:00 at the D Note, 7519 Grandview Avenue in Arvada. Please e-mail Jacques Delaguerre at Special:EmailUser/Jaxdelaguerre if you plan to attend. Be there or be square! – Buaidh 19:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Colorado

It was recently suggested that WikiProject Colorado, to which you are a member, may be inactive or semi-active and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there haven't been much active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. I have begun a discussion on the projects talk page to see how the members of the project feel about this suggestion. Another user has added the project to the WPUS template and I added it to the list of supported projects in the WPUS main project page but before I take any further action I wanted to contact each of the active members for their input. --Kumioko (talk) 23:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MOTDs (This space for rent)

You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 00:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User script list deprecation

Wikipedia's list of user scripts is in bad shape, in that it is disorganized and contains many non-working, unmaintained, or thoroughly obsolete entries. Cleanup has been on the to-do list since 2007, but little progress has been made. Instead, the whole list is now set to be deprecated on 1 May 2012, to be replaced with a new list. This draft list has been up for about a month, and in that time I've been soliciting script users and authors to come add scripts they know to be working and relevant.

If you know of scripts that you would like to survive this deprecation (and are confirmed working and relevant), you're welcome to add them to the new list. Note that the old list will be retained and linked from the main list, so there is no real deadline. Thanks for your help. Equazcion ^(talk) 00:55, 22 Apr 2012 (UTC)

Can you maybe help out with these articles...

They were created by a university class as part of their final grade/project, some of us were thinking the articles could maybe have a home at Wikiversity, but I need some guidance here. Can they be moved to Wikiversity, are they good enough, etc. (I understand the articles are now starting to be PROD'ed, probably as 'subjects failing notability'.) Please see discussion on User talk:Dennis Brown at Curious about some new articles. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014

Today's motto...

Failure is the mother of success.

Nominate one today!

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Your admin status

Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.

You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on enwikiversity, where you are an administrator. Since that wiki does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.

If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.

We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Best regards, Rs chen 7754 20:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vacation3

Template:Vacation3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo ¡¡M listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nintendo ¡¡M. Since you had some involvement with the Nintendo ¡¡M redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vacation3

Template:Vacation3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Digitalme. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Scotty3.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Scotty3.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Digitalme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Digitalme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Vacation3" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Vacation3. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 4#Template:Vacation3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikimediaNoLicensing

Hello, Digitalme,

If you have a question about a page deletion, please contact the administrator who deleted the page. You can see this at the deletion notice at the top of the page. They might be able to provide you with the answers that concern you. But do not create an orphaned talk page, they will never see this page and it will only be deleted by speedy deletion, CSD G8. You can also bring your questions to the the Teahouse if you continue to have unanswered questions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've contacted the admin on their talk page and referenced them to the defunct template's talk page. I'll just note that the TFD specifically directs questions to the template's talk page. And since they're an admin, even if it's CSDed, they'll be able to view what I wrote.

It would have been much more helpful if you just gave me the html of the template by email.

digital_me (talk) 05:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC) digital_me (talk) 05:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz your assumption that this template will not be undeleted is incorrect. it cannot be said that the talk page is orphaned until each person specifically mentioned has a chance to respond. sorry I'm not a chronically online wikipedian any more. but this is just basic logic. why mention me if one doesn't want a response?

and again, I'd ask any admin to send me the HTML or the wikitext. how else am I even supposed to have an opinion? digital_me (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An orphaned talk page just means the corresponding non-talk page doesn't exist. The template looked like this. Nothing in the closed discussion suggested that you can't make your edits available on other licenses (e.g., releasing them as public domain) in addition to (rather than instead of) Wikipedia's licenses. SilverLocust 💬 10:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]