User talk:Dighapet

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuscumbia for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 05:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry. I will next time. Thank you letting me know. Dighapet (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize

Hello, Dighapet. You have new messages at Tuscumbia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tuscumbia (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Genocides in history. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 21:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you but I made only one edit. Dighapet (talk) 21:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I realise that. But participating in a general edit war without discussion on the talkpage is not a good idea. Plus it is always good to know the rules before anyone goes over the the 3R limit. Anyway there is a discussion on the talkpage and please discuss any points you may have there. Thanks again. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 21:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Thank you. But why do you not warn the user who removed the Khojaly massacre BEFORE he discussed? why do you not ask him to discuss first? Dighapet (talk) 21:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because his revert was within policy. He is allowed to revert if core policies are violated. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 21:37, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What??? There are 40-50 genocides mentioned in page and he selected one and deleted complete. And with NO discussion and you call it "core policy"??? Dighapet (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Komek

Salam. Sizden mene burada destek gostermenizi xahish edirem. Hormetle, --Verman1 (talk) 09:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baxdim amma deyesen bashqa yerde arbitraja vermek lazimdi. Orada hetta kimse yazib ki bashqa yerde vermek lazimdi. Dighapet (talk) 13:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tofig Kocharli

I'll try and get to it in a little while - when I have a few minutes free. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement warning: Armenia and Azerbaijan

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

You have been involved in a large number of edit wars recently (e.g. Karabakh Khanate, Gandzasar monastery, and Tsitsernavank Monastery); particularly in this topic area, reverting without consensus is disruptive to the goal of building a quality encyclopedia in a collegial editing atmosphere. This applies even when you merely join an edit war rather than starting one, and even when you are right. In the latter case, bringing better sources will show that your editing is not disruptive. Your requests for page protection have been helpful. Many of your talkpage posts advance the discussion, but I urge you always to be careful to discuss edits and sources rather than editors, and to avoid a battleground mentality. - 2/0 (cont.) 14:38, 8 April 2011 (UTC) Please the next time you remove sourced information, write why you do it. Vidovler (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are limited to one revert per day on all articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan

Per the report of edit warring at WP:AN3#User:Dighapet reported by User:MarshallBagramyan (Result: 1RR imposed per WP:ARBAA2). The 1RR will last three months and will expire on 29 July, 2011. This restriction may be appealed to me, to WP:Arbitration enforcement or to Arbcom directly. Blocks may be issued by any admin for a violation of a 1RR. Individual admins are permitted to enact these restrictions per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement. The restriction is being logged at WP:ARBAA2#Log of blocks and bans. Kuru (talk) 00:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement warning: Armenia Azerbaijan 2

Please see this [1]. Vandorenfm (talk) 03:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dighapet. You have new messages at Talk:March Days.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ethnic tables of Ganja and Nakhichevan

I won't be talking about the sockpuppetry issue. I just want you to explain me what's wrong with the two ethnic tables on Ganja and Nakhichevan articles. Please read the sources carefully and if you can find any problems or POVs, I'll excuse. You're just saying that I'm nationalistic, but you are deleting the Russian and Soviet census results, which are neutral. I want you to explain me what I did wrong and I'll try to fix it. Thank you. --Yerevanci (talk) 00:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Yerevanci, it is not only about these two articles. I this report I brought Nakhichevan as one of 5 evidences because in these evidences you act the same as Meowy because you are Meowy and your other account Hovik95 is Meowy. You can say what you want but you can't change the fact you are a sockpuppet account. Meowy has always played with many IP's and has always been catched. Look how rich is his archive of sockpuppets. That's why other users were reverting you too because the admins found the evidence you were hiding. Dighapet (talk) 13:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC) [reply]

I see you again, you didn't answer to my question. I really don't care if you think I'm someone else (that's your problem, if you feel I'm someone else, go for it), what I care about is that you delete sourced information which is unacceptable. Again, if you really think that I'm someone else, that's your problem. I don't wanna get involved in that. You just act against justice. Even if you don't want to do that, you show it by deleting neutral information. Thank you. --Yerevanci (talk) 22:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Topic-banned for 4 months

On 8 April 2011, you were given notice that the Arbitration Committee, at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement, authorised administrators to sanction any editor who disrupts a page relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan. Further to the complaint submitted on my talk page, I have concluded that your change here to Talk:Barda, Azerbaijan, in which you refer to "Farida Mamedova['s] discoveries that uncovered Armenian lies", was totally disruptive. I am unfamiliar with the broad topic area, but it is imperative on Wikipedia that our contributors do not make sweeping racist remarks like "Armenian lies". Furthermore, your repeated reverts[2][3][4] at Barda, Azerbaijan make it apparent that the restriction of your account in April 2011[5] to only one revert per day ("1RR") has served only to make you revert protractedly.

On balance, none of this is at all acceptable. Accordingly, per the above-linked arbitration ruling, you are prohibited until 00:01 on 16 January 2012 (UTC) from editing any page that broadly relates to Azerbaijan or Armenia. If you violate this restriction, your account will be blocked by an administrator for an appropriate time. AGK [•] 21:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The normal place to appeal arbitration enforcement is at WP:AE (or another community noticeboard) using Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal as indicated on the page there. Starting an ArbCom case as an appeal is not the usual way. Mathsci (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but I filed there because in Wiki rules it was directed to that page Dighapet (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read the section marked "Appeals" at the end of the red section at the top of WP:AE where it is explained how to appeal sanctions. Where exactly did you find your information? Mathsci (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Mathsi, I reposted on AE. Dighapet (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]