User talk:DietLimeCola/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, DietLimeCola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you would just tell me what I did wrong, I'll stop. I'm just cleaning up vandalism. --Wack'd About Wiki 01:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the offical site says Kevil likes 60 minutes, even if its never mentioned in the show, then he likes 60 minutes. THE END. I dont care if it was never mentioned in the show, it obviouslly needed Danny's approval to be on the OFFICAL ED EDD N EDDY website. You are also removing lots more data, just because it was in one episode only doesnt mean its false. Kevin expressed his like for football in THREE episodes by the way. Eddy lives on Rathick Ave. You claim he just made it himself, but if he made the ID card himself, why would he put his middle name on it, knowing if someone found it he would be made fun of? Ed's pets would be mentioned too. Jonny expressed his love for clams in 1 episode, but yet that stays, same with Eddy's brothers lactose problem. Double D has 7 hats, every day of the week. This is important because most people believe he just wears the same hat every day, which is not true. Stop acting like you own the article, because you DON'T. I agree some facts need to be cleared out like about Rolf and Norway, and Jimmy and homsexuality, just because it was mentioned ONCE doesnt mean it isnt important. the end.

Blocked

I've blocked you for this edit. Pretending to be an admin to gain an advantage in an edit war is unacceptable. Yank sox 02:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:EdEddnEddy2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:EdEddnEddy2.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get bigger images. It doesn't do anyone any good if the picture is a thumbnail to begin with. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 18:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

DLC, I want to apologize for any rude thing I might have said to you when you first showed up here. You have turned out to be an excellent editor of Ed, Edd n Eddy. Thanks for your concern about the article. -- Elaich 02:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's cool. We all had a rough start, but I'm glad (almost) everyones getting along now. DietLimeCola 20:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I am tentatively unblocking you. However, if I see you do anything else objectionable, I'm going to reblock you. Raul654 02:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so you got blocked again, eh? I see your true colors coming through. You wouldn't also happen to be HardlyBoys, would you?

I am not TheHardyBoys, my "true" colors came through when I was actually using Wikipedia for good, let me explain the reason I got banned (and then unbanned). I was at the Library, and saw someone using Wikipedia. I saw that she was using Global Warming page for her homework, (which is something you arent supposed to do!) so I did something wrong. I added a tag to Global Warming that would indicate that the page might not have accurate information. Well the plan worked, she saw the page, and she went to some other site to get the information. Unfortunetly, I got banned for it. I explained it to the person who banned me and we came to terms and he agreed to unban me. There was nothing big going on, it was just a simple mistake I made that I explained to him. See my edits and you wont see anything else. It's none of your concern, your just trying to pick a fight believing your the only good person to come onto this site. So stop being a Negative Nancy, you arent looking at ANY of my good edits, the just few times I screwed up. Your just trying to prove you are correct about me, but you know what? You're wrong. So get over it, you were wrong from the beginning, and you're having a tough time admitting that you were WRONG. If you have nothing nice to say to me, then dont say anything at all and LEAVE ME ALONE. Thanks for reading. I am not a vandal, I never was, I was just a n00b having a hard time trying to figure out this site back then, and I do nothing but try to help this site, and YOU CAN'T ACCEPT THAT. YOU ARE WRONG. OH GOD, WHAT WILL YOU DO IF YOU WERE WRONG AT LEAST ONCE? Grow up. P.S. You are the people who make this site suck besides the vandals. I dub you: "Wikipedia Bully". DietLimeCola 05:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have edited your own user page to delete unwanted content. That alone is violation of the user agreement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.7.153.51 (talk) 06:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

No I haven't, stop harassing me and spreading lies. That is a complete lie you MADE UP to attempt to "prove" to people that I'm a vandal. WOULD YOU JUST CUT IT OUT? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DietLimeCola (talk • contribs) 06:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Drew Pickles

There's no need to AfD articles like this - they can be merged and made into redirects, as long as the merge is documented. They can always be split out again if necessary. (Of course one might be wary with contentious articles.) Rich Farmbrough, 22:32 6 November 2006 (GMT).

Alrighty. DietLimeCola 22:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

I dunno, it was 7 delete to 4 keep (63%) just based on the raw numbers, it hadn't been tagged as needing reference or original research (still isn't), no effort had really been made to source stuff one way or the other. I say add the tags, and if no one can bring the article up to an acceptable quality, merge the info somewhere or redirect it to a main article, or propose deletion again... just make more of a case for it being inherently original research, it should have a much stronger chance of deletion. Of course you can challenge my closing at WP:DRV too if you're looking for something more immediete. --W.marsh 23:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, and May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg ^{(drop me a line)} 19:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You too! :) DietLimeCola 04:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kankers.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kankers.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EdEddEddy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EdEddEddy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EdEddnEddy2.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:EdEddnEddy2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MascotGuy/Casper's Glowball

It's not that MascotGuy is a vandal per se, just that he tends to make a lot of dubious edits and won't respond to any messages. —tregoweth (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, Edd 'n Eddy episodes

Could you mention why you are removing episodes from the tables?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes, you will be blocked. John Reaves (talk) 04:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not vandalising the page. Season 3 had sixteen episodes under it, but each season of Ed edd n eddy only has THIRTEEN episodes. I was moving the misplaced episodes to season 4 which only had 10 episodes under it, yet you people assume in erasing the episodes. Can you at least check what I'm trying to do before you assume in vandalizing, because that wasn't cool at all. They were temporarly removed so i could MOVE it to season 4 like I stated above. DietLimeCola 04:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try an edit summary next time. John Reaves (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lesson learned I guess DietLimeCola 04:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mandy (Billy and Mandy)

Regarding this edit[1]: Don't remove toomuchtrivia tags without dealing with the trivia according to guidelines. If you don't want to deal with it, then leave the tag alone so somebody else will. CovenantD 01:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology (2)

While I still think that the AfD was a clear merge consensus based on the closing statements of the admin and that it should be allowed to be merged, I should have both conducted myself better in the dispute and discussed it more than I did, as well as not reverting. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, glad to hear that. I respect your point of view and opinion on this as well, lets just

be civil about this. DietLimeCola 21:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh I liked the new addition about "Gnoff" on the nexus page :p Raphaelaarchon 03:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? DietLimeCola 04:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I misread the history and thought you had added it, it was apparently IP 67.xxx.xxx, who keeps vandalizing the page, according to the history. My bad. You're the one who removed it, not added it. Did you get my email about screenshots? You never responded to my reply to you. Raphaelaarchon 21:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hello, I am user Driveus. I was wondering if you would like to join WP:Cartoon Network. I see that you have an interest in Ed, Edd n Eddy, Billy & Mandy and cartoon network. I hope you join. Driveus

Thank you for joining WP:Cartoon Network. You're going to need this.
CN This user is a member of WikiProject Cartoon Network.

Thank you for joining. Driveus

Please vote on deletion of Ed, Edd, and Eddy character pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_%28Ed%2C_Edd_n_Eddy%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edd_%28Ed%2C_Edd_n_Eddy%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_%28Ed%2C_Edd_n_Eddy%29

Thanks. -- 71.138.27.12 02:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were right...

Elaich admitted that User:64.169.155.142 is in fact his IP address. According to DNS Stuff, the IP belongs to Pacbell and it's located in California. This means that Elaich and much of those Pacbell IPs (the Californian ones) who have been editing Ed, Edd n Eddy could be the same person after all. Squirepants101 17:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, PUHLEEZE! How long will you continue with this? If I were the "IP vandal" do you think I'd be stupid enough to publish my IP? Millions of people live in Northern California. Get over yourself, or make an accusation. But you better have solid proof if you do. -- Elaich 21:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you were 100% that user, the deletion page just showed off a hint that you were cheating (such as you posting a comment on Squires talk page while the IP posts the exact same message on mine only seven minutes later), which is why I reported you to checkuser (Although it failed). If you did nothing wrong, then you did nothing wrong and have nothing to worry about. Although either way you have nothing to worry about, I just thought you might of been cheating on the AFD pages, nothing more. It's over anyways.

Besides, I live in Northern California too. DietLimeCola 21:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ed edd and eddy

I will tell a admin , and have him or she lock it , I think it should say curent. Spareus151 23:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]