User talk:DiamondIIIXX
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DiamondIIIXX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GabeIglesia (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject Cricket
[edit]Hi DiamondIIIXX,
Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Cricket!. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!
- You will see a list of articles that need most improvement .
- You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
- Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Cricket, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Cricket!
Feel free to put your name on the project member list. Hope you will have fun here, let us know if you need any help! Bobo.03 (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, DiamondIIIXX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DiamondIIIXX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Like your page, very useful as there is a lot of misinformation out there. I note there are a few big projects missing (Gregory, Warhook, Ewerleigh, Edenvale). I am happy to add plus relevant citations. Also could correct a few of the proponents of the ones I know have changed hands. Tobytj (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Badgingarra Wind Farm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APA Group. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Testing of FlaggedRevs (Pending Changes)
[edit]Hi DiamondIIIXX. Back in March, we discussed in #wikipedia-en-help that you were having some issue with edits that were being flagged by the Pending Changes system as needing review, despite you being a member of the Extended Confirmed user group. There have been some changes that may have resolved this issue. Please test these changes by making some edits to pages with Pending Changes protection enabled, and seeing if your edits go through. If you would like to read more about the issue, you can read this Phabricator ticket as well as this other Phabricator ticket. If you get a chance, please let me know on my talk page whether the issue seems to have been fixed. Thanks! Phuzion (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
List of Golf major winners/Grand Slam Tennis winners list
[edit]Hi how are you ?. I notice you added a big change to the golf majors winners page regarding a list to match the tennis grand slam winners. The list of major grand slams wins in tennis only includes 276 of the the 473 grand slams that have been staged. Are you going adding the other winners to that page please ?. Why did you change the golf to all on one page was it not better the old way ?. Kind Regards 89.204.237.119 (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @89.204.237.119: What slams is the Tennis list missing?
I changed the golf list so it matched the tennis list, (same formatting etc). Also, I moved the list onto the list of champions page, instead of on the majors page (which links to it - the majors page is about the majors themselves, not statistics) DiamondIIIXX (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
I know that I can see exactly what you have done. Are you finishing the list of players that have won a major in tennis ?. I think the golf pages should have been left separately as they were to be honest 89.204.182.73 (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
what slams are missing? DiamondIIIXX (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
On the Champions list section. this list only includes players that have won 3 majors it stops after that. There should be 150 grand slam winners on the tennis list 31.200.176.244 (talk) 10:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I did not edit that section, but the reason it stops at 3 is for the sake of readability. Listing every winner is too exhaustive DiamondIIIXX (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
No it has been done in the golf where 227 different players that have won 457 majors and they are all listed on the page you added too. So if there are only 150 players in tennis to win a major they should be added . It should be a total list like golf. Would you agree ?. 178.167.154.158 (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't think it's really required. You can make the change if you want. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 21:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
You don't think it is required why because there are 200 slams missing and you don't want to add them ?. But you would mess around with the golf majors page 89.204.189.90 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, when you removed the chronological golf winners list (year per row), it has not been placed anywhere else - it has completely gone - so we need to reinstate it.
It's also far better we reinstate it to match the ladies' majors page style, along with removing the foolish reordering, which now lists majors in the wrong order.
I wish people would stop tinkering with these pages, and let them be!
Thanks.
Peer review for Coopers Gap Wind Farm
[edit]Hi, are you still interested in the peer review for Coopers Gap Wind Farm? I can leave some comments if you want. Zetana (talk) 07:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead DiamondIIIXX (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll leave some feedback later today. Zetana (talk) 19:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
UDRS - History
[edit]The reason that you have given for deleting my submission as ' conflict of interest' is unacceptable and wrong. In fact your decision to erase my contribution is a breach of Natural Justice. I am a lawyer. I have the right to be heard in respect of matters that concern me and my intellectual property rights. I am the inventor of the 'Player Referral' concept. Nobody before me ever suggested the use of a Player Referral' mechanism to over turn wrong decisions of a ground umpire, by appealing directly to the Third Umpire. I am supported by publications in leading newspapers and cricket Journals in the world.
What you have done is a great injustice by depriving me of due recognition for a novel contribution to the game of cricket. The umpire referral and Player Referral' are two different things based on different philosophies. You as the Arbitrator have a quasi judicial and moral obligation to listen to what I have to say in respect to what I have discovered. Publications support as evidence of my achievement.
I kindly request you to reverse your decision and reinstall my earlier text. If you need further evidence or any other assistance to satisfy your criteria, please let me know.
Thank you. Senaka Weeraratna — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.211.143 (talk) 13:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Additionally, there are not enough Wikipedia:Reliable sources for your claim. Please refrain from editing until there are reliable sources on your claim. @Dirkbb DiamondIIIXX (talk) 00:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
This important file that you created is proposed for deletion as there is no source for the background map and data coordinates used in making it. I did find the reference for the coordinates and inputted them but I was unsuccessful about the source of the blank map. Could you provide the latter to stop the deletion.
Pierre cb (talk) 03:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'll remake it with Openstreetmap as the basemap. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 07:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi:
I'm updating the Canadian network with the radar site positions with "Geolocation" French template but I did not find a way to place range rings. Could you tell me how you overlaid the 100 and 200 km ranges on your map?
Pierre cb (talk) 00:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Could you update this article?
[edit]Wind power in South Australia has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, DiamondIIIXX. Thank you for your work on Dulacca Wind Farm. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:
Hey y'all! I sure hope y'all are havin' a mighty fine day today. I just wanted to say a heartfelt thank you for takin' the time to contribute to Wikipedia by creatin' that there article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Now y'all can rest easy and enjoy the rest of your day, along with your kinfolk! Y'all take care now, ya hear?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Warradarge Wind Farm
[edit]I notice that you broke the page at Warradarge Wind Farm with an edit in 2020. Could I ask you fix it - working with tables is beyond me - otherwise the Operations section will have to be culled. Regards, John beta (talk) 08:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "broke the page". I added the generation table and a code snippet (for excel) to help others maintain the data. This is explained in the paragraph above: "Warradarge's code is WARRADARGE_WF1. A SUMIF operation is used on the data published by AEMO to get the total (shown in the table below)." DiamondIIIXX (talk) 09:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Announcements from WikiProject Cricket
[edit]
| ||
Annual newsletter to be lauched[edit]WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated.
Upcoming contests[edit]
Ongoing discussions[edit]
• Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests •
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 – Nominations open now!
[edit]
| |||||||||||||||
– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Which table form in Lists of power stations?
[edit]Hi DiamondIIIXX, I noticed you contributed most of List of wind farms in New South Wales and List of wind farms in South Australia. I understand the simplicity of just changing the Status field when the project changes status in real life.
However, the tables have become a little confusing with many non-operating. List of wind farms in Queensland looks more orderly after I separated entries between operating and non-operating. What do you think? Where would an appropriate place be to discuss this matter generally for the state lists? .. Regards from TGCP (talk) 04:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TGCP, I agree having two lists, one for completed projects and another for everything else is probably a better way to do it. The talk page of each article would be the place to discuss further DiamondIIIXX (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. As no objections have occurred in 4 years for the Queensland article, I wil be wp:bold and change some of the others. If a discussion is requested, we can consider the possbility of differences between the articles. TGCP (talk) 09:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)