User talk:Dhelpling

Welcome!

Hello, Dhelpling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk) 21:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Helpling article

I see that you have been editing the article David Helpling. Assuming that you are, in fact, Helpling, as your user name suggests, you ahve a very clear Conflict of interest. You need to be very careful how you edit. It would be much better for you to make suggestions on Talk:David Helpling and allow other editors to apply them, or not. You can add {{request edit}} to attact the attention of an experienced editor to consider any suggestions.

these edits are a classic example of why a person should not edit a wikipedia article that s/he has a close connection with. You added uncited opinion and puffery to the article. Wikipedia articles do not, or at least should not, make statements of opinion or evaluation except when quoting or paraphrasing named sources who are cited directly. Phrases such as "... driven pursuit to create the music of his dream ...", "fearless in their pursuit of the lush and monumental sound", and " With all the essentials for an epic musical journey: compelling and expansive multi-layered drum elements, strong melodies over powerful synths and guitars, vast spaces of deep and mystifying ambience, THE CROSSING led listeners to the ends of the earth, and beyond." are value judgements, not statements of fact. Unless a reviewer or critic published such statements in a reliable source, they do not belong in the article. The same applies to many other phrases you inserted.

A few minor points of formatting: Wikipedia places the titles of songs and short works in "quotes" and the titles of independent works in italics. We do not use ALL CAPS for titles, or for much of anything else. People, and particularly article subjects, are normally referred to by full name on first mention, and thereafter by surname (last name) alone, unless there are multiple people with the same surname, or other reasons why this would be confusing. They are not referred to by first name. Quotations must be attributed to the person or entity being quoted, and must be accompanied by a citation to a published source where the quote can be verified. Except in citations, links to sites outside Wikipedia (external links) are not included in article prose. A few such links may be gathered in an "External links" section.

The article David Helpling has still not solidly established WP:Notability. See Wikipedia:Notability (people) and particularly the section known as WP:AUTHOR for the relevant criteria. The article needs additional citations to independent reliable secondary sources. If you know of such sources, such as reviews or profiles in print or online magazines with good reputations (not blogs or fan sites), or newspaper coverage beyond concert or release listings, please list such sources on Talk:David Helpling so that they can be included. Otherwise someone may well nominate the article for deletion, and it might be deleted after a consensus discussion. DES ^(talk) 22:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit] you reinstated the exact same promotional text that I specifically mentioned was inappropriate above. I have removed it. Please do not do that again. Please read the above comments, and provide some reliable independent sources for the article, if you wish to avoid it being deleted altogether. DES ^(talk) 17:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DH Studio 2003.jpg

The file File:DH Studio 2003.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploader = Person depicted. Permission needed from photographer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]