User talk:Dhalsim2

Welcome!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JTtheOG (talk) 03:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to American Solidarity Party. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goodone121: Thank you for doing your part to ensure that the information on Wikipedia is accurate and not misleading. That is my intention as well. The data posted on uselectionatlas.org is outdated or simply wrong. See the Presidential election ballot access and results table for details. I have previously gone through the work of documenting the data that I've used with references from authoritative sources. If any of my sources are seen as inadequate for any particular reason, feel free to let me know, and I'll do what I can to provide more substantiation. There is no intent to mislead on my part and only an intent to provide more accurate information than what is already there. As such, I will be restoring my edit, as it is more accurate with more authoritative references than what is already in place.

May 2021

Hello, I'm Tartan357. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from 2021 California gubernatorial recall election. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:08, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Sonski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Sonski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SecretName101 (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]