User talk:Dhalamh
AshSIreland, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Hi AshSIreland!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Serie A winning managers has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 07:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Nomination of 2020 Formula One pre-season testing for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Formula One pre-season testing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One pre-season testing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tvx1 13:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]A goat for you!
[edit]Goat
Skeletorhig (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
minor edit
[edit]Please don't tick the minor edit button unless it truly is minor, e.g. fixing a typo or reverting obvious vandalism. Your edit looks good, but it's not "minor". It made a subastantial change to meaning. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, yea, force of habit. I didn't actually have a good definition of minor edit in my head actually. Thanks Dhalamh (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Results breakdown of the 2015 Spanish local elections (La Rioja)
[edit]Hi! Glad to respond to your questions:
- I think you are making the comparison incorrectly. Indeed, you seem to be comparing to "other election articles". This is not an "election article" per se; the proper election article is at 2015 Spanish local elections. This is a results breakdown article that serves as a split-off due to size limits, as well as for operational purposes. It is also a list-class article which is part of a much wider series of articles (note Category:Results breakdown of the 2015 Spanish local elections, not counting those for 2019, 2011, 2007, 2003, 1999... etc.). In this sense, comparison would be much more appropiate with Results of the 2021 German federal election, Results breakdown of the 2019 United Kingdom general election or Results breakdown of the November 2019 Spanish general election (Congress), among others.
- It is only one entry because only one has been done so far, but it does not mean that only one will be present eventually. It is intended for all the major municipalities in the region to be shown (such as in Results breakdown of the 2015 Spanish local elections (Navarre) or others); however, this takes time, so only the capital city of the regional has been covered as of now. We are not in a rush to complete this, but it's obviously intended to be completed following the same criteria and structure as all other articles in the series.
- Yep, the lack of bolding is an error, I will correct it now. As of it being the only element in the list, I refer to the previous point.
- For this point, I also refer to point 2: the list is not complete, so obviously no colour shade is used (yet) because Logroño did not change hands in this election. It did in 2019, though (where you can see how the shading applies). Again, this serves as a guide for future progress.
- I also don't get the point on "blank sections". Which sections are "blank"? You only edited the heading and the bolding in the first table.
I think this covers all of your doubts, but if you need any more clarifications please feel free to comment. Cheers! Impru20talk 15:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Copy vio
[edit]I'm not a YoutTube zealot but https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Bonamassa&diff=next&oldid=1069253076 is a clear WP:COPYVIO. Sincerely Yours MMC is not Disney and so not the copyright holder. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Copyright, ha, yes. Haven't come across that principle (see what I did there) yet on my WP journey, but should have guessed. Thanks. Pity I can't find a good reference as it is a nice nugget of info. Dhalamh (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
IVC
[edit]The Indus Valley Civilisation is a high level article. That means it is written in a distilled summary form, based on text-books that have been vetted for due weight. I am sorry for having to revert your edits, but you may discuss them on the talk page per WP:BRD Fowler&fowler«Talk» 09:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't add the earthquake bit you are referring to, but I appreciate that you waded through a bunch of edits and want to inform everyoneDhalamh (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)