User talk:Devidafrica.villager

Welcome!

Hello, Devidafrica.villager!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Skajlajjn1996 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skajlajjn1996. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Devidafrica.villager (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am new editor, i am edit only grammatically mistakes and some sentences Devidafrica.villager (talk) 16:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block, sockpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 17:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is checkuser evidence that the user is a sock puppet. PhilKnight (talk) 17:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Devidafrica.villager (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Does my account have the same IP as those accounts? If yes, then you can happily block them. But if by sharing my views, it is decided that I have met those people or that the account belongs to the one mentioned, then this is wrong. All my contributions can be seen. There is nothing that suggests that I have done anything wrong. Devidafrica.villager (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please do not make more than one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Devidafrica.villager (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need 2 unblock requests. PhilKnight (talk) 17:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does my account have the same IP as those accounts? If yes, then you can happily block them. But if by sharing my views, it is decided that I have met those people or that the account belongs to the one mentioned, then this is wrong. All my contributions can be seen. There is nothing that suggests that I have done anything wrong. Devidafrica.villager (talk) 14:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Devidafrica.villager (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Does my account have the same IP as those accounts? If yes, then you can happily block them. But if by sharing my views, it is decided that I have met those people or that the account belongs to the one mentioned, then this is wrong. All my contributions can be seen. There is nothing that suggests that I have done anything wrong. Devidafrica.villager (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. asilvering (talk) 02:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Devidafrica.villager (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please place unblock requests at the bottom of the page. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does my account have the same IP as those accounts? If yes, then you can happily block them. But if by sharing my views, it is decided that I have met those people or that the account belongs to the one mentioned, then this is wrong. All my contributions can be seen. There is nothing that suggests that I have done anything wrong. Devidafrica.villager (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]