User talk:Devesh117

Ways to improve Dimpy Bhalotia

Hello, Devesh117,

Thank you for creating Dimpy Bhalotia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Large portions of this article appear to be copied from Bhalotia's own website which would be a copyright violation

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W Devesh117 (talk) 10:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC) okay fixing the issue[reply]

thank you soo much Devesh117 (talk) 10:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dimpy Bhalotia - possible conflict of interest?

I am puzzled as to why after a couple of days of detailed editing of the Dimpy Bhalotia article, particularly between yourself and User:Lopifalko, that you saw fit to cut and paste previously removed content of dubious notability, including unreliable and/or broken links (that Zealous one - "example.com" again - for instance, which I have repeatedly flagged)? Apart from a handful of initial edits, you also seem to be solely focused on this article. Do you have any association with the article's subject? Paul W (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W Hi Paul. This is my first page. I am learning and trying to make it perfect before I create another page. I want to create pages on many more photographers and anything related to photography books and galleries. But I want to concentrate on the first I created and finish it before I move on to another one. I will remove the zealous co. I thought the previous citation didn’t work hence you flagged it. My bad!

Lot of other content was removed by user:lopifalko. Which later I put in with correct citation and it got approved.

I am still learning and I respect and appreciate your inputs Paul. It’s helping me to learn and understand.

Please do let me know if something else is not right and I will immediately remove it. You have the experience and expertise in this Paul. I apologise if I made a big mistake but my intentions are all good. Devesh117 (talk) 18:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I first saw this page (during a routine New Page Patrol), I flagged it for possible copyright violation as over 60% of the content appeared plagiarised from DB's About page. I accept that this may have been an honest mistake by a new editor during early stage article creation. User:Lopifalko also made a series of edits (well-justified by reference to the Manual of Style, WP:MoS, notability guidelines, etc), and I felt the article had achieved a degree of consensus (WP:EDITCON) prior to your recent edits. Striving for perfection is laudable, but, particularly for a biography of a living person, "Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress" (see WP:PERFECTION). I would suggest that you move on to other subjects, maybe improving/expanding existing articles on photography-related subjects; this will help you learn more about Wikipedia, and will show you are here to build an encyclopedia (WP:HERE) and not just promote one particular subject. Paul W (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To my mind there is a WP:COI. I removed an unsourced year of birth. At the time, the subject's own about page did not include a year of birth and neither could I find it elsewhere. Soon after, Devesh117 re-added the year of birth, with a source of the subject's own about page, which now included "born 1987". The Google cache confirmed that earlier the page had not included a year of birth. -Lopifalko (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Lopifalko. Devesh117 please see WP:COI: "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships." If this applies, please make appropriate disclosures. Paul W (talk) 07:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Devesh117. Thank you for creating Rija Randrianasolo. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article. It could be improved by adding more biographical content about him - some of the citations already in the article could be sources for these improvements.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isadora Romero moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Isadora Romero, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isadora Romero

Hello, Devesh117. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isadora Romero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isadora Romero

Hello, Devesh117. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isadora Romero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]