User talk:Destynova/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Regarding Falun Gong

Hi Destynova, I have moved your comments down to the end of the page so that they can be seen more clearly and so that your comments can be incorporated in helping the currently ongoing mediation resolve. I hope you don't mind!:)--Edward130603 (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Not at all, I hope it does help the discussion improve so that people with better subject knowledge can repair the article and make it less blatantly pro-FG. Reading the article actually made me wince uncomfortably :D

Destynova (talk) 14:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Should Persecution of Falun Gong be renamed into something else?

That is the question that is repeated again here: Talk:Persecution of Falun Gong#Requesting Move. Since you are not an involved editor, would it be possible for you to provide an input? Thank you in advance for your time! --HappyInGeneral (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Jiang Shi

Google Translate or Babel Fish may help translate the sources.Mendel 56 (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

NEW TOPIC (re:- old reference from cleanup)

Hi ... sorry for the intrusion - but in trying to "discover" how to clean-up ... my own userpage & talk/talk page & trying to discover how to archive & / or retrieve?

I read through that cleanup to do "list" & I thought wow - I won't burden "all" with my burblins eh?

(as my 80kb's is just maybe too far "off" - this "clean-up" planet)

& then I spotted this... (yours)

QUOTE Much of hydraulic power steering appears to have been written in a foreign language UN-QUOTE

From away back in 2009 ?

Um? Actually - that makes reasonably GOOD "common sense" to me - see.. as I did a Patent in 1998 and then 2 world patents as well - AND ALL OF THEM - were having to be written - in this apparently goobledie gook ((( OLD_TIME_ENGLISH )))

The reason - is that Patents " being at the extreme TOP END of the COPY protection scale (with the least ability to enforce I'v since discovered) apparently have to be SO tied down - as to be completely "COPYRIGHT" protected (at an EXTREMELY huge $$$ cost might I add)

When Others - can just "legally" lay claim - to vast tracts of "very" hard to prove "content"

AT no cost

simply because they wrote - or "sang a song" & / or someone even recorded it - & THEN SOLD THE RECORDING - and now they ALL want the total right to new content - that was never theirs - AND are able to "legally" claw BACK - everything made thereafter - simply because some little part - "MAY" be theirs?

I myself - don't agree - in principal - nor in LOGIC - to such a blatantly WEIRD scheme...?

Because - I have since learned - that the ONLY difference between a good accountant & a Good Lawyer - is that the GOOD lawyer ??? can subtract 3 from 1 to claim the answer at 7

PLUS award themselves a whooping $300 an hour .. for getting that weird answer "thankyou".

& Me- copy ? ?Well hail year...

Ever since before I was 12 yrs old - I have been USING all resourses - (which MY CREATOR has given me - in whatever form) - to CREATE mine? And I will always consider doing exactly THAT - as my OWN OMNIPOTENT "higher power" CREATOR - holds ALL - as far as I'm concerned - FREE LICENCE PATENTS - on everything - that HAS ever existed - even before time began - which of course - precludes anything - someone MAY lay (so-called legal) "claim_to" - nowadays? (especially after THEY SELL that - to the public domain via (sold) TAPES & CD's etc...

Especially & possibly because of- I have spent (literally) hundreds of thousands of dollars on 94 pages of "intricately" worded goobldie gook, (along with 54 highly detailed technical drawings) ???

JUST for the - yes - HAD to be ALL written (and proof read by me - after each draft) WORDS - for my 1998 "based" world wide NZ Patent 330 552 (along with a similar quanity for each of the LATER obtained Aust pat 754678 & yes even the PCT/NZ99/00066 "as well")- which was THEN basically "worthless" trying to Protect - & so - after wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars - over 11yrs ? ? ? .....

So .. ? oops sorry - waffling again - ?

But... that hydraulic stuff (you couldn't make easy sense of) - was "written" in Patent Speak ... (& in English - but like mine - not very good though eh?)

Cheers...

OH.... & Can you advise me.. HOW?

How do I cleanup - that which I've created, and am thus too close tooo, - to actually KNOW what to "cleanup", without thus then - wandering OFF on another LONG yabbering >>>

Just a glance at my userpage & talk = talk & archive (that I cannot archive) will give you a wee inkling of my problems, (if you haven't spotted them by now) ? and thus yes - they ARE problems?

Cheers. Roxburgh NZ (talk) 11:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC) p.s... KNOWING THAT THESE (both) MAY VERY WELL "BE" DELETED ...

I have - purely for posterities sake - so that my adopted son - may give these to his grandchildren - IF ever there comes a time - when I'm long enough deceased - for these to simply be written again - or cut pasted - (as I HOLD them as being - even now "free" documents) BUT - in doing that - have deliberatly placed a huge red MARK - across the email above each copy... these words...

MY MAIN PAGE - user: Roxburgh _ NZ As it was - when I asked for help NEVER RE-INSTATE - (EVEN IF ALTERED or IF DELETED)

As I have absolutely NO intenton - of reverting anything another has deleted - either in good - nor in bad faith - (once is all that these now are - "THUS" as-inserted)

so - GO FOR IT - clean MY house (& if you watch my vids - U'll c - I never will)

Roxburgh NZ (talk) 12:15, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Roxburgh NZ! Wow. I have to tell you that it was quite difficult to figure out exactly what you were saying since you wrote the above in a very stream-of-consciousness style. I don't remember deleting anything from that page, rather rewriting a couple of bits that were had grammatical errors or were simply unreadable. (But it's possible I did - it was some time ago and I'm too lazy to check the history!)

Sorry to hear about your hassles with patent systems - there are few things I hate in this world more than patent systems, and particularly software patents and patent trolls. That's a lot of money and time wasted (well, hopefully it led indirectly to some improvements in your life too). But remember that Wikipedia is intended not just for engineers (or patent lawyers!!) - but for everyone. Therefore if a relative layman such as myself struggles to make sense of a piece of text, even if you find it clear (or you wrote it and think it should be clear), that might indicate that it could be rewritten in a simpler way without detracting from its content.

In fact, doing small readability fixups, removing typos and grammar errors and deleting obvious vandalism or clearly ludicrous statements is pretty much all I do on Wikipedia. I almost always leave the actual clever stuff - adding new content - to experts like yourself.

All I want is that, if there is useful/relevant information in an article, it be formulated in a way that it can be understood by as many people as possible.

BTW if you really feel that I was wrong to delete something, go ahead and re-insert it. We both have exactly the same "rights" on Wikipedia, and you clearly have experience in this particular domain which I don't - therefore your opinion on the technical content carries much more weight than mine!

All the best. Destynova (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, just re-reading what you wrote - I specifically meant that the text contained lots of grammatical errors and weirdly written things which suggested that the text had been translated from another language in such a way as to make it more difficult to read. When I see text like that, I want to improve it so more people can understand it, but the more difficult the subject material (to my layman's eye) and the more poorly written it is, the less I can do to fix it. So I probably left that as a note asking other domain experts like yourself to improve the writing style. Destynova (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Oops sorry - I must appear a complee twit (I-smiles_knowingly)

Actually - you haven't even started, thus have NOT BEEN deleting great chunks

(YET) - but I KNOW you will - which is why I got "in" - 1st - see?

Um - Oh - & yes

I also needed a reply from a real person - instead of the bot I got when I missed my 1st edit Roxburgh NZ (talk) (after registering (oh and that reminds me of ? no - I'll do that later)

As I said...

I needed a real person - such as youself

To write in the correct "codes" (to allow me to now NOT have to double enter ENTER oops ENTER (is that correct ? the KEYBOARDS enter (go) button?

to simply get what YOU have given me - a double COLON after enter - to start a new line? without those

silly space wasting 4WDslash(p)backWDslash's

Also I SAW - (later) that the hydraulics thing - DID appear cross transferred (missinterpreted) - upon reading this & later also going back?

But- NO- actually- my reason- (as you have so eloquently reminded me)-

Usually IS - ? OFTEN too deeply smoothered in my brainrush - (to get my 300,000 words "out" before I get the subject line "thought_through")

QUOTE

in a very stream-of-consciousness style

[UN_QUOTE]]

?

The "real" reason is this !

As an independant editor - & one of some notable worth (in my esteemed opinion)

Please grab as many ADMIN staff as you see fit & scrounge through my gibberish on MY USER PAGE & on my TALK TALK - you will see the "flowing reasons therein that I need (((HELP))) with?

(as there is significatly MORE - of this - as YOU quoted - steady stream of conciousness etc etc)

Because I'm sadly lacking in Common Sense "conciseness" (a strange phenomenum - that I'm not used too - having my OWN form of Common - to ME - sense... that has always been at odds with everyone else's HERE too?

Especially when it comes to trying to explain something realy simple - in a few words.

which I've completely stuffed up again - in doing?

Even my Patent attorney said - that MOST patents - only have ? at most 1 & 1/2 pages - and MAYBE a rough sketch...

I had written- in "patent type speak" all 92 pages (actually around 120 that we "shrunk" to 92)

PLUS - having been a Draughtsman Surveyor in the 1970's - I also DID all 54 of the drawings - in a HIGHLY SPEC'd manner - & much better than their own Draughtsman could manage

Thus ...?

(((PLEASE HELP)))

As I need

(oops better NOT make a template thing like I accidently TEND to do "here" - ?

What with my prolific usage of wiggles & squiggles that I AB(use) in ordinary life..

So it's

"ADMINHELP" that I need ... (yep -THAT- is the active word)

Roxburgh NZ (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

my humblest appologies for the confusion

Roxburgh NZ (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

And now - 4the more latent problem?

(I see double colons didn't work (again - funny that) S I'd EXPECTED .. instead - everything ranhither& thither everywhere... BUT

this

is what I need to show - YOU ... in my very first few edits - two - three days ago ?

wow is it that long?

(I must climb into bed soon)

Anyway - I thoroughly misinterpreted the ORIGINAL "bot's'request" - that I sign my entries .. AND I simpply "signedz' in my usual long speak - LEGAL: NAME manner... & got my IP address slammed along side"it' as well....

so?

I actually started this whole process of Registering - TRYING to (as I know the term to be known NOW as)-

Trying to easy fix my silly OVERSIGHT?

SEE...

(a quick gander at my entries history - will show - ?

::::: EVEN I can confuse myself

Oh & to aide you - in your quest - should you be tempted to follow it?

HERE

Is my IP address - (because as Roxburgh_NZ - I - ? has logged out)

cheers

(me-smiles-again) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.181.132 (talk) 16:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC) ?Hey - it's not there ? OK - i'll grab it from my email...

Ok - BBS

cheers 16:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC) oops that won't work? (ah - I see now - 4sguiggles GETS it "in" after all -

well - the email still matches it ANYWAY...

BUT this will (both work eh?)

Someone from the IP address 125.239.181.132 has registered the account "Roxburgh NZ" with this e-mail address on the English Wikipedia

125.239.181.132 (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

just(small editing)+(again)

125.239.181.132 (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC) WOOOHOOO>>>!!!! Three days & NOW -

I can finally "stop" being an over anxious GEEK

All my unsighned unregistered's are THERE - wahoo - thus .. MAYBE - you can erase my "legal'name? or simply LINK them into my Roxburgh_NZ "credits"? Cheers (cutting & pasting (saves loggintime) Roxburgh NZ (talk) 16:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

BUT

125.239.181.132 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

still verifies me - as me 125.239.181.132 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC) colon-hyphen-CLOSEbracket - I smiles again ...? As I just remembered -

Actually- thats a complete waste of time - as MY legal name is already - since - oh three years ago? "splattered" across even googles profile pages (now) - for all to see? cheers? from User:Roxburgh NZ|Roxburgh NZ 125.239.181.132 (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey, you seem to have incorrectly assumed that I was some kind of admin guy, or knew admin guys or even any of the processes of getting "admin" stuff done on Wikipedia. None of that is the case - I'm just another anonymous editor just like yourself! So I probably can't help you with those questions.

Regarding conciseness and "stream of consciousness" writing - you're an engineer! I searched one of the patents you mentioned earlier (an Australia registered patent on a kind of hinge) and saw a very nicely drawn diagram. Even if you have an indelible habit of brain-dumping all of your thoughts as you discuss a matter, it's still important to go over it and filter out the stuff that doesn't need to be said or contributes little to the discussion/article etc. I take a fair amount of time to check and fix up almost everything I write, due to a similar habit of being overly-verbose. If you can invent a new type of hinge and draw diagrams explaining how it works and why it's useful, then you can very easily type your thoughts into notepad first, then distill them carefully and produce a more concise, relevant and readable output. Discussion forums and personal blogs are a great place to practice this (because, especially on forums, if you waffle at length, people will immediately pull you up on it and give useful (if sometimes hurtful) feedback). Destynova (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2