User talk:Despotuli

Welcome!

Hello, Despotuli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Thanks for all the work on solid-state articles! I hope the above links are helpful. Melchoir (talk) 16:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Superionic conductor

A tag has been placed on Superionic conductor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is a very short article providing little or no context. The entire article is a word-for-word copy of text from Fast ion conductor.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SWik78 13:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I agree with your notes. (Despotuli 08:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Solid electrolytes

A tag has been placed on Solid electrolytes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is a very short article providing little or no context. The entire article is a word-for-word copy of text from Fast ion conductor.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SWik78 13:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I agree with your notes. (Despotuli 08:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Nanoelionics

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nanoelionics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nanoelionics. Closedmouth (talk) 11:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helloy,Closedmouth!

Fifteen years ago, when the paper “A step towards nanoionics” was written, Prof. Ukshe E.A., said (before he recommended the paper to Solid State Ionics): "nanoionics" is the curious word and it can be published.

Now, nanoelectronics is rapid running towards his fundamental ultimate limits. In such area as the thickness of dielectric layer, it reaches a few atomic layer thick, and cannot shrink further. Fast ion transport at nanoscale will help break this limit, and at this important area of meeting, the nanoelectronics and nanoionics merge in common. It will be nanoelionics.

"Nanoelionics" is the new scientific term with a rich future. Despotuli (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have to provide reliable third party sources that verify the word's notability. On Wikipedia, we try to avoid neologisms so until this word becomes commonly used or sufficiently notable, we can't include it. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]