User talk:DerHexer/archive01

JFS

There is someone repeatedly vandalising the The John Fisher School Please help. Thanks in advanceBreakfast100 17:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin here. But I can look if the article is vandalized and report the IP to WP:AIV. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksBreakfast100 18:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may be new, but...

I can see how my edits may seem like vandalism, but I didn't realize how diligent this wiki had become in maintaining the status quo. I took a break from this for a couple of years, and boy, it has changed. Anyway, I have included comments for every good faith move I made, yet I still need to read Wiki Law for Dummies. Anyways, the point is; indirect links to fan sights that report on the opinions of what you could call non-fans should be a bigger red flag to the editors than the deletions of paragraphs that rely on the aforementioned sources. I know you can get into a routine, but you must realize that true vandals are crafty, and that it may be worth seriously looking into every 15th edit or so, to see if it's good. To serve the quo.

There will be no problem if you always use the edit summary. Greetings and go on :), —DerHexer (Talk) 09:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aw c'mon dude, emo sucks!

Please tell me you agree with me. If not, you're just like all the other faggy little MTV darlings who have the NERVE to call themselves "rock." EmoHater6661 19:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)EmoHater6661[reply]

Is it a reason to vandalize articles? No! Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to hate emos, this is like hating races you anti-semite!-hiwhispees

Your Help

I noticed you reversed some vandalism on Keenan Wellar I came across some very nasty stuff today on that page and did my best to fix it up. There was also some vandalism by I am sure the same person on LiveWorkPlay which leads me to believe there is some personal vendetta sort of thing going on since the pages are connected. I'm new to this and not sure how to monitor/correct without just checking every day.

My Edit Was To Prevent Vandalism

My edits to the Roger Billings article are to restore valuable content that has been developed over several years. The emotional attacks of recent edits are clear attempts at character assasination and are damaging to Wikipedia. It would be better if you would help protect this valuable and well established collection of information. Firewriter 13:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Could you use the next time the edit summary? Thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 22:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow me to clean the references section in C++

Pls hold till I finish. Please don't revert the changes. The page is looking ugly Jayaram Ganapathy

Okay. It looked like vandalism without mentioning anything in the edit summary. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 11:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit

As a veteran ok Wikipedia, I must warn you your revert of my edit was unwarranted. There WILL be consquences. --125.238.29.27 11:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you vandalize user's pages? TheWizard 11:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of Wikipeidan are you? You call a vandalism warning vadalism? --125.238.29.27 11:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking a page, yes. Use the discussion site or WP:AIV. TheWizard 11:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "Listen to me your moronic pit of ignorance," looked like a personal attack. Leafyplant 11:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was merely freindly banter. Please don't overreact. And please don't put words in my mouth. I said "...YOU moronic..." as opposed to "...YOUR moronic..."

no, check your diff here [1] Leafyplant 12:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is regarding Daniel Smith's Wikipedia article. I am terribly sorry about whiping out the article--it was an honest mistake. The word "Buckee" (something like that) was typed all over the page, so I just thought I would delete it. Sorry for the mistake. I'm not even sure if I am supposed to write my apology here. I am new to this whole thing. Once again, sorry.

Careful!

Hi there - Just noticed your revert on Raymond Lee Oyler... I think it might have been more appropriate to delete the unsourced information rather than just rollback and accuse the author of vandalism... it seems they didn't know how to remove it themselves. MackSalmon 00:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's vandalism 'though it might be correct. Somebody who watches the article will correct it then. My "job" is it to revert vandalism, and this is vandalism. Or do you thing, it would be better to have this in the article? I don't think so. Good night, TheWizard 00:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ACK. That's why there are talk pages. --Complex (de) 00:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, I only mention this because WP policy states that unsubstantiated biographical information should be removed - I don't see a sourcing for that info, and combined with that request I thought it inappropriate to accuse that author of vandalism - if they knew how to use a talk page I assume they would have done. Just a point of order, that's all. MackSalmon 15:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian angel

Thank you for reverting vandalism in my user page. --Meno25 07:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! TheWizard 08:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto from me. Thank you for the very speedy reverts of the vandalism to my user page! --Bonadea 10:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On de.wp I would be faster. ;) TheWizard 10:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me too. First bit of vandalism on my page. - Ctbolt 11:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you have vandal fighters here? On de.wp we have a huge community of people who revert vandalism. TheWizard 11:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag

Guten Tag Herr Wizzard.

Wie Gehts?

Ich auch bin ein Vandal Fighter.

Ich WP:VF Gebrauch.

Mine deutsch is nicht gut, Entschuldigung.

Auf Wiedersehen Leafyplant 12:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine, nice to ask. I use the VF (now for de, en and es), too. It's no problem to speak English, I hope you understand me a bit. :) TheWizard (Talk) 12:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your english is perfect, I was just trying to remember the German I learned in gradeschool. It turns out that I dont remember much.Leafyplant 12:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understood it and that counts at all. TheWizard (Talk) 13:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angel's Egg Vandal

Ok, the vandal on the Angel's Egg page has pulled alot of stunts in the past. How do we get someone to block them? Tech43 17:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV I think or any sysop. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 17:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For reverting the vandalism on my user page. - TexMurphy 17:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —TheWizard (Talk) 17:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bokurano

You reverted this edit, where someone was creating a new page for the characters from the show as opposed to keeping them all in the main article. Just be careful in the future. Leebo ^T/C 18:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like vandalism without commenting it on the edit summary. Nevertheless, according to the GNU FDL it's against the copyright separating a page without mentioning the main editors. It would be nice, if you could report it on the correct site. I'm new on en.wp and don't yet know all your pages. ;) Greetings and thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 18:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, you're right, about the GFDL. I'll have to research how page separations by characters are done. Leebo ^T/C 18:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. On de.wp I delete the seperated page, revert the user in the main article and tell him, where he can find informations about the GNU FDL and so on. I think it's here the same. :) Thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 18:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was referred to Wikipedia:Summary style#Other specifics, which states that it is okay to split up an article if the split between the articles is properly noted in the edit summary. I have done this for the articles in question. Sorry for the confusion :P Leebo ^T/C 19:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On de.wp we have to write the complete history and article into the new one saving it. Then we delete everything but the text which should be separated and copy the history of the main article into the talk page. Thank you, —TheWizard (Talk) 19:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vandal patrol!

Great job with the vandal reversion on the Thomas Edison article. The time stamp shows reverts the same minute as the vandalism, which spoils all the fun of the little scholars sitting in their school's computer lab. How does the bot know a vandal edit from a good edit, or do you sit and watch certain articles 24/7? Edison 20:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm real using WP:VF in combination with WP:TW, having vacation from the university and made a lot of reverts in de.wp. ;) And I would like to help here, too. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 21:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal patrol

Hello TheWizard! On my watchlist I've seen that you are doing some fast vandal reversing. But I've also seen that on some articles you just reverted one edit by a vandal leaving the prior edits of this vandal unreverted e.g. International Space Station, maybe a problem with your configuration of TW? Anyway thanks for the good work and happy editing! --VirtualDelight 21:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your compliment. TW has—I think so—four reverts. There I used the faster one, which just reverts one version. Next time I should use the rollback buttons. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 21:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the revert to my user page. J Milburn 21:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —TheWizard (Talk) 21:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop

It is not against the guidelines to delete the content on one's own talk page, so please stop reversing my deletions. I have already made a report about all the reversions on the admin board, and they also point out that it is not against the rules.67.163.193.239 22:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. —TheWizard (Talk) 22:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Luv

The name of the song is actually "Hey Luv (Anything)". What's wrong with redirecting the page? What would you rather have me do? MrBlondNYC 09:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You should move it, otherwise you are against the copyrights. Thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 09:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Who do you think will win the MLB MVP??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.224.177 (talk)

I don't know. —TheWizard (Talk) 21:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Whacking Stick

Here's a nifty flail for being an utter speed demon on Twinkle. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. Twinkle is nice and fast. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 21:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for reverting my user page! Caster23 23:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User: shark kid

Why did you erase the link on my friend Ian's page, user:shark kid? I wasn't spamming, it was something I told him about and he wanted the link! It's cruel to erase that! Mind your own business!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by BeaverWithChainsaw (talk • contribs) 09:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I could not know this. Use the edit summary or, even better, the talk page. Nevertheless, please sign your posts. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 09:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the quick revert on my user page. --Onorem 11:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catlin Gabel School

You reverted someone elses attempt to clean up vandalism on the Catlin Gabel School article. The teacher descriptions that referred to hellfire and immortality were clearly pranks, and removing them is not vandalism. 192.147.239.1 17:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It looked like vandalism without mentioning anything in the edit summary. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. But, I do note from reading the other messages on your talk page that I'm not the only one complaining about inaccurate accusations of vandalism. You might want to think about checking edits a little more carefully before reverting them and warning people. In this case, even without an edit summary, if you had just stopped to read the text that was being removed then you would have realized that removing it wasn't vandalism. Just a thought. 192.147.239.1 18:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are more or less missunderstandings: people don't use the edit summary or don't know how to work correctly with the wikipedia software. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't Vandalize Hawaii.

I didn't vandalize the Hawaii topic. i was only deleting the vandlism that was there.[ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.83.88.146 (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry. I was wrong. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Fan sites not allowed on Wikipedia per RULES==

Stern fan network is a fan site and is NOT allowed on Wikipedia per RULES. This will be reported along with your activity of vandalizing and reinstating the page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.213.209.31 (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You are vandalizing. If you want to delete the page, use {{delete}}. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure how to delete, I am sorry..Can you help me with this situation ?

You could write {{subst:prod|advertising}} into the article. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not_Vandalism

Read the fucking page before you declare it vandalism, asshole. --206.82.28.11 18:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then delete the people and don't vandalize. Don't offend others! —DerHexer (Talk) 18:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user/talk page recently. Mr Stephen 21:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pssh

Warn Johnnyfog for vandalising my page <personal attack removed>. He fucking started it. Sean mc Sean 21:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

o_O —DerHexer (Talk) 21:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is referring to this edit, which offended him. --24.136.230.38 22:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Cursing-hiwhispees

Trying for sysop here too, eh?

Nice job vandal fighting - I can't revert fast enough! —Wknight94 (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for reverting vandalism where I probably couldn't reach (browser problems, etc). Thanks again (I see your changed your name)! You putting me out of a job! --24.136.230.38 22:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it's good to give the buttons a person who is just three days here, I won't stop you. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I support Wknight94's question. I think you would ba a great admin. On the other hand - I nomnated you at the de:Wp to work there as admin. You're working abroad ;). Without any joke - DerHexer is one of the best Vandale-fighter at de:WP. He would be a great admin at every Wikimedia-Project. Marcus Cyron 22:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find me here? ;) Do you think, it's okay to candidate after (now) five days here? ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not, if it is possible. How I find you? Ey, I'm one of youre Buddies (I think ;)). And look at de at Elian's Blog ;). Marcus Cyron 10:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, there was something. ;) Psst. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

.o(yes, we will watch you, hehe) --Kellerkind 16:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, when voting starts. ;-) --Schwalbe 13:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I dont see how i can vandalise a talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.204.41 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages will be archieved. You are not allowed to blank them. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry dude. didnt know. thanks for the info. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.111.204.41 (talk) 22:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wow!

You revert vandals so fast, I can't get any reverting done! You're as fast as a bot! Nice job. I wanna be like you. Virtual Cowboy 22:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, thanks. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Not a problem ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tool suggestions?

Hello, I was wondering what tools you use to allow you to revert so fast? I'm interested in helping fight vandalism and tried Twinkle, but it's giving me lots of errors. So any tools you could suggest would be helpful. Thanks - SirLeopold 23:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could try Vandal Proof (be wary of edit conflicts, thought; you might warn the wrong person). --24.136.230.38 23:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I use WP:TWINKLE in combination with WP:VF having a lot of practice on de.wp. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why i blanked ?

just because the questions looked very provocative as well as insulting ... thats the reason .. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Giggling bee (talk • contribs) 10:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Could you write this into the edit summary? So it would be easier to separate it from vandalism. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atombomb

Hi, I removed the speedy delete template from this article, since it might be useful as a redirect to nuclear weapon. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 16:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you were to fast. I reported this version. The other one i didn't see. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Defense League

You obviously have not read the link. It does not mention JDL and there is no evidence it is listed as a terror organization. I will report you if you keep this up. Posting bias articles without research.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eternalsleeper (talk • contribs) 18:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your proof I dont expect you to reply, because you will find no proof. Because it's bias lies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.124.136.98 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 19:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Down

I am trying to revert vandalism and try to approach my edit milestone, but you often beat me to these things, causing me to experience these extremely annoying edit conflicts. Rushing is never the answer. Amos Han ^Talk 19:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you prefer having vandalism on en.wp? o_O —DerHexer (Talk) 19:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am just trying to revert vandalism, but instead, the edit conflicts prevented me from removing vandalism. Amos Han ^Talk 19:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I do, too. It doesn't matter who reverts it, but it have to be reverted. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 19:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the edit conflicts are extremely annoying. The first time the IP vandalizes pages, you have to put a level 1 warning before putting a higher level warning. Or you could put {{subst:bv}} Amos Han ^Talk 19:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and What I actually do is to leave a warning on the vandal IP or user's talk page before reverting the vandalism (to save time). If the vandalism still did not get reverted yet, I reverted it. Amos Han ^Talk 19:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) This is your way to fight vandalism. My way is not ineffective and nobody had problems with my work since years. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to do so. But please respect the work of those who do not want to risk "forgetting" a revert and having other readers of the wikipedia reading a vandalized article. Thank you. --Complex (de) 19:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was an ACCIDENT

I didn't "vandalize" this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Doctor_Who_vehicles Whatever happened must have been an accident. Or someone else did it. 69.42.6.193 19:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't hold it against you. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also didn't vandalize it. Please note my comment on the page it's important. There's a spam site that directs to wikipedia. Please review my comment on the talk page. Let me know that I'm clear.84.229.246.201 21:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

fuer's aufpassen hier. COFS 22:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalization of Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel

I am not attempting to Vandalize a page. It was a page that was up for speedy deletion due to lack of notability issues. I am simply attempting to re-write the article in a more encyclopedic fashion.

There has apparently been some serious issues with this page in the past. Though I am sure much of the problems can be attributed to people editing the page with blatant disregards towards POV and NOTABILITY issues, I begin to wonder if it is not also the case that administrators are attacking it with a great deal of fervor.

I will continue to edit it to the best of my ability to make it conform with the aforementioned criteria. Seary6579 22:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do so. :) But please do not blank pages which are not in your namespace. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks for the info, as I am still learning the customs of WikiSeary6579 23:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm learning, too. Always. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added several links to outside interviews with the artist Dr. Steel to his page, along with links to reviews of his music, in an attempt to strengthen the notability issue. I have also tried to eliminate most of the POV issues in the text. Obviously this article is going to need more work, but I think it can be regarded as NPOV, informative, and notable enough to stay long enough to be improved by other users. How does one go about arguing a page NOT get deleted? Seary6579 15:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greets

You are not longer alone here. Soon, the german rev-mob will be complete. —YourEyesOnly 04:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prust, gacker :-) Endlich wird man hier begrüßt. —YourEyesOnly 07:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huch, die Reaktionen gehen ja hier schnell. Dabei hatte ich deinen Hinweis hier noch gar nicht gesehen, sondern deinen Interwiki in de.wp. ;) Willkommen, —DerHexer (Talk) 07:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please block the attempts of 125.16.7.62 and 155.35.46.11 to vandalize Kamma (caste). They are filling it up with abuse, slander and inanities.Kumarrao 05:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not an admin here, so I can't block IPs. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 07:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: please Stop

Hello. You have recently sent me a message saying that I was vadalising the page T-Pain. I was merely experimenting on the Bio because there was a lined box around half of the bio and I attempted to remove it, but I ended up removing the half. I knew something bad was to happen so before I did anything, I copied the info. When It did not work, I pasted it back as to not disrupt it. Perhaps you should get the facts straight. if you have the logs, please note that my story IS true. I don't know why there was a box there, and I'd rather not considering the attitude I am getting from you. Please review this. Thank you. Mr. Joel C.Y. Lau 05:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This and this looked like vandalism. ;) Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 07:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did I not state that I copied and pasted the exact same thing? I did not put in the other line of vandalism. If you think it was me, then you have the wrong person sir.Mr. Joel C.Y. Lau 04:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not send you a warning, but the IP. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 09:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You actually did send me a warning. That IP address is mine.Mr. Joel C.Y. Lau 22:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 04:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who made the edits. But you can see them, I can see them. I trust in you that you did not make these edits, okay? Good night, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you this Barnstar for your tireless efforts in fighting vandals. You are the NextBestSuperadmin. :) -Sinn- 11:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

/me slaps Sinn. Wessen Idee war das? Und für den Rest: Grr. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you this Barnstar for your tireless efforts in fighting vandals. You are going to be the an excellent admin :-) --Complex (de) 19:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by User:142.165.199.10

DerHexer, well done with your report of this IP to AIV; I've blocked it for 24 hours. In the future, however, please ensure that you're using all of the warning levels found at Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Blocks and not just going straight to the highest level warning. Thanks, A Train^talk 19:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that means he just doesn't tolorate blatant vandals? --24.136.230.38 20:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe so, but blocking of anonymous IPs is always a last resort. The 24 hour block that I imposed on that IP address may well have blocked a library, college or other public access terminal. The person making disruptive edits may have left that terminal, and a well-meaning editor might now be at that address. If we can get a vandal to stop by walking them through the warning levels (which works 75% of the time or more), then we keep that IP address available for constructive edits. Remember, one of Wikipedia's core goals is to be an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. For more info, see Wikipedia:Blocking policy. A Train^talk 20:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Then I'm doing 2000–3000 edits per day just reverting blankings here, because nearly no one other does it. I can't notice to myself all of my warnings. I've already problem to notice two ones. The pages are full of warnings and are never deleted, 'though they are by dynamic IPs. … Do you want fighting vandalism successfully and effectivly, or not? … Do you want people to watch the recent changes and it's not too hard work for them? Should they leave, 'cause regularies are stoping them from fighting vandalism? … On de.wp I block IPs for one or two hours if they are vandalizing and not if I talked to them four times, that they are doing a lot of sh*t. I think, one warning and one final warning should be the maximum for IPs do see, that they are wrong. This are three reverts, two talkings and one reporting. If you say, i have to respect your rules, you are right. I try to do this. But helping vandals to do their "job" is against my conviction. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should take a second to read my reply to the anon IP above yours. A Train^talk 20:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Why don't you block blanking IPs for one or two hours? On de.wp it's the only way to stop IPs. They don't react on warnings and wear down the reverters. I love the wikipedia, it's like my family and everyone should edit it, if he's not vandalizing. If you are five, ten or more times reverted before you are blocked, you stop one time, yes. But it looks bad, if an outstanding person see blanked or vandalized pages they ask themselves, if wikipedia is really a good project. If they see, we allow vandals blanking pages, wikipedia loses its plausability. Do you want this? Do you want a lot of vandalism? Do you want huge histories of articles? I don't want to believe this. My heart hangs on wikipedia and every vandalized page is a stab into my heart. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe. But, wouldn't that urge the good contributor to register an account? --24.136.230.38 20:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I just figured out the IP was registered to SaskTel. So, multiple users were using the account. But, like I said above, wouldn't that urge the users to register an account? Of course, there is always not having the time... --24.136.230.38 — Preceding undated comment added 20:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I blocked 10.000 people from Mercedes Benz for one hour because they used one IP adress. It's the problem of the company to fire those workers who vandalize here. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts are all well and good, but as you know better than most, they are entirely optional. Everyone should be able to edit the encyclopedia anonymously if they wish; most users start out as anonymous IPs before they register an account, and those first few anon edits are what hooks people into Wikipedia. Leaving IPs unblocked as much as possible is important. A Train^talk 20:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's all right but not for vandals: They are (nearly everytime) away, if they were blocked for one or two hours. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will follow your rights but it hurts everytime I see a vandalized page. But don't wonder if sometimes there is no one who wants to fight vandalims here. If it continues like it is at the moment, I feel gloomy about the future. :( A sad and demoralized —DerHexer (Talk) 20:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hexer, don't be demoralized. You're doing a great job and ought to be quite proud of the work that you do here. But don't take vandalism to heart quite so much; it's not that big of a deal. All it takes is for someone to revert it, and vandalism is usually gone within minutes because of hard work from people like you. Don't let it get to you. Thank you for all of your effort. In fact, here's a barnstar. A Train^talk 21:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		Thank you for your tireless efforts to keep the English Wikipedia free of vandalism. A Train^talk 21:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like You Need Another...

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You do jump to the third warning level a little quickly; I prefer {{bv}} myself, then {{uw-vandalism4}}, in very special cases. But you're constantly beating me to the punch, so I wanted to say thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Madman bum and angel 21:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your two barnstars. I will have a look at {{bv}}, thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Vandalism Revert

Sorry, that was me I thought I was logged in. Thank you anyway. Brylcreem2 21:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hawker Siddeley Trident

Can I ask why you rv my change to the Trident article - made to conform with aircraft project guidline - dont understand copyvio ! .MilborneOne 21:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to copy&paste articles. It's against the copyrights of our GNU FDL. You should move the article. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK Understood - it wont let me move if a page already exists ? MilborneOne 21:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could read Wikipedia:How_to_rename_(move)_a_page#Moving_over_a_redirect. The short version: speedydelete the redirect and move it then. —DerHexer (Talk)

Thanks #2

Thanks for reverting the vandalism from my userpage. Take care! --Ann Stouter 23:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Light Rail in North America

I was not trying to vandalize the page. I was trying to restore information, which was deleted by the pervious edit. But somehow the code got screwed up and you got that very weird page. If you notice, I re-added the information and it's in good shape now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.53.142.31 (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fine. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

I was removing unsourced material per the talk page discussion. 137.22.11.206 17:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be carful, too. If you vandalize more times, you will be blocked from editing. Don't nearly blank articles. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read my previous comment? I wasn't vandalizing. 137.22.2.65 17:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Marys College

The information on this page is incorrect, that is why i have deleted it. St. Marys Academy and College and St. Marys College are two very diffent institutions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.212.45.103 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you use the next time the edit summary? It helps us to separate it from vandalism. Is it necessary to delete the categories? —DerHexer (Talk) 17:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The current St. Marys Academy and College has no connection with the original St. Marys College. If someone wants to start a page about inaccurate information on the St. Marys Academy and College, then do so. But leave the original St. Marys College page for just St. Marys College info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.212.45.103 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aide (medical personnel)

That was I that put that page up. I meant no harm by putting that page up. Vandalism was not and will never be my intention. I am not that kind of person. My intention was only to educate the community about what the informal title is if they are in a situation where they become a lay rescuer but not helping the victim directly (e.g. getting materials, calling 9-1-1, etc.) Redsox04 17:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I reverted the IP, not you. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About a template

I see you are very fond of the blatant-vandal warning, but my impression is it is actually deprecated, this as far as I can see. The present user-warning page is at WP:UTM. I get a bit confused with your level of usage of the blatant-vandalism - warning, allthough the level here of vandalism here is very high. Greswik 18:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still confused, that talking to IPs is much more important than stopping them. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting page blanking vandalism on my user page. Amos Han ^Talk 18:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did something similar yesterday

You put a speedy delete tag on User talk:172.206.146.118. I did the same thing accidentally on a userpage yesterday myself. Originally the editor made a regular article page which I correctly speedy tagged. Yesterday I looked back in my watchlist saw he recreated it not looking that it was called the same but a user page now as well and I incorrectly speedy tagged it. An observing editor mentioned it to me and it was removed. Don't know if similar has happend to you but I took the tag off the talk page (can't speedy that) and just deleted the obscene word that was put there for pretty much no reason but to be a vandal. See you around. Thanks for your time. --Xiahou 22:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis 'Iron Mike' Burton

hey hey dude i dont know how to leave you a message so im gunna say it here the page Lewis 'Iron Mike' Burton is just the Scarface story line with the name 'tony montana' ommitted and 'lewis' or 'iron mike' inserted.

i just thought i would tell you so you can delete it coz i dont know how too.

also that person created it about them self coz i know them —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Choczilla (talk • contribs) 01:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Integral humanism

Hi, you [2] reverted removal of a section from Integral humanism. This was not vandalism. It's POV/propaganda and the reference cited is a Tripod page. 202.54.176.11 09:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult to separate it from vandalism, if it's not standing in edit summary, why it was removed. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! It is greatly appreciated. --TeaDrinker 20:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Everytime again. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Israel

I can't make heads or tails out of what is going on with 86.154.85.58 is he deleting others posts, changing them. just his own. what? besides the fact its turned into a discussion about israel itself and not the article I want to step in a fix things but can't tell who laid the minefield. Can you tell whats going on? --Xiahou 22:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. But the truth is out there. ;) On de.wp it had happened, too. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

minor edits

Not trying to get on your bad side when I just got done asking you a question but I looke at your contributions and almost all are flagged minor edits and many are not. Is this a personal thing or some wiki thing I don't know about yet, just curious. Thanks for your time. --Xiahou 22:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All reverts and warnings are automatically set to minor edits. And that's what I'm doing here most of my time. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ah gotcha. Since I usually do the same was wondering if i had missed something in the policy. Ok, thanks. --Xiahou 22:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Ubuntu (Linux) edits.

The edits you reverted were not vandalism. 7.04 has been released and the next version will be 7.10. The generic IP user was correct. Please do not remove constructive information from Wikipedia. Valaqil 16:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Sorry, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Curses!==

You beat me to rving thaT guys vandal edits like five times! You're good! Viel spass! Whiskey in the Jar 16:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, a lot of fun for you, too. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of vandalism on California Condor

Reversion of vandalism can be a thankless job, so first let me just say thank you for the hard work. However, a bit of caution might be in order, since the anonymous vandalism you reverted on California Condor brought the article back to a version that had been nonsense-vandalized by Saker277. In short, keep up the good work, but also keep an eye on what is in the history before doing it :-) --Pekaje 18:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I'll try to do so. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

uranus

I am very sorry I thought the article was about the area after your colon I didn't know a planet also had that name lolz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Piepoop (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 08:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hexer

File:Txrangerbadge.png

To the fastest gun in the wild frontier of vandal fighting!
Keep up the fabulous work, mein Liebling Freund! :)

Phaedriel - 09:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 09:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jo mai - mir sammelns hia abba Merieten! ;) Marcus Cyron 12:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ist auch etwas einfacher als auf de. --Complex (de) 16:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whats up! I tryed to edit what my classmates did, but they continued for using my computer to screw around. I only did the I love you thing, and tried to delete it!

Angel Barnstar

		The Angel Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! SU Linguist 20:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks #3

Thanks for all the vandalism reverts on my talk page. IrishGuy ^talk 22:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 12:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

also, thanks. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 12:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, too. I hope that you are all too frequent vandalized 'cause it could demoralize. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ...

... your userpage due to mindless anon vandalism. Hope you don't mind! :) - Alison^☺ 22:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I don't want to hide from vandals—it's better they vandalize on my user page then on an article page—so that I prefer to have it unprotected. At this time I slept, by the way. ;) Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: reverting your userpage

No problemo. Happy editing! Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 23:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 12:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks #4

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. (I didn't notice it until now.) --Nlu (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and no problem. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for vandalising the page. my friend did it. he thinks its funny.

User:Roustan

Thanks for catching the vandalism on this page. You're our hero. Cheers! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.214.193.107 (talk) 04:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Um, right...

Listen, I don't know who you are and why a message showed up to me on my computer - something about vandalism and Kobe Bryant and a threat to stop...??

Um, I have far better things to do with my time than discuss Kobe Bryant with anyone. All I know about him is he is a sports player and I guess he was accused of rape or something a while back? I don't even know - oh right, BECAUSE I DON'T CARE.

So whatever you have assumed, let me correct you - you don't know what you are talking about because it was not I who even looked, let alone wrote anything, regarding Kobe Bryant.

What's more, I don't even have an account. I mean, let's be real here.

--208.65.40.97 16:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)dustmouse[reply]

Three days ago your IP made those edits removing posting and so on. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not. I would suggest you get your information accurate before you accuse people. --208.65.40.97 16:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)dustmouse[reply]

Then you use a dynamic IP and another one had make this. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

It's great to see your enthusiasm, and your assistance in new page patrol is appreciated. However, may I suggest that you slow down a bit so that you don't make so many errors. It is often a good idea to review previous edits in an article#s history log so that you don't restore to a previous bit of vandalism (as you did here [3].

Also, if you did not revert an edit, please review the reverting editor's style to see if they are in the habit of leaving warnings or wait a while to see if a warning is forthcoming before warning the user who introduced the change. The reasons are:

irritation factor - other users are irked when the warning they are issuing results in an edit conflict.

unfairness - the user being warned may be unfairly saddled with 2 warnings for only one misdemeanour.

Once again, thanks for the sterling work, just don't spoil it by being in too much of a hurry. Regards LittleOldMe 17:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note - everyone goes too fast. I once had to point out to _four_ different experienced editors that over a period of months they had restored the same vandalism over and over. Sometimes I go to the bottom-most 'revert' on the history listing and compare with my chosen revert point, just to see what I might be helping to stay in the article. It might be the apostrophe bandit, or just a deletion that no one saw. But I go slow... and fall behind. But if you see more than one IP in the history, please do be sure to check. (BTW: I can't believe they didn't block User:Ol33 after the first time!) Shenme 18:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I look if two IPs made edits in a row and check this. But I mainly trust in blue users. ;) Sorry, I'll try to check this, too. If I didn't revert it but left a warning there, I got an edit conflict because the user was faster. I'm not randomly talking to users. ;) That warnings are doubled happens to me, too, 'cause you don't delete talk pages from dynamic IPs as we do in de.wp. The consequences you can see here. To the unfairness: Better safe than sorry (if a user really vandalizes). ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down Mr.Wizard, you are making our jobs to fight vandals even harder and you are setting such a high standard for vandalfighting..hehe..Please Continue..Cheers..--Cometstyles 16:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Hexer - give vandals a chance ;). If you're too fast maybe they will leave forever - then you'll lost your job ;). Marcus Cyron 11:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I would be lucky to lose this job. Maybe another one will be better. Or I can concentrate on my studies. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

Hi mate, was just wondering if there was any way to request a block? Whiskey in the Jar 17:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV? —DerHexer (Talk) 18:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! Cheers dude! Whiskey in the Jar 18:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Youre sig seem to be on warning done by User:Lupin/Recent_IP_edits. You may want to contact them to get the bug removed. --Eddie ^{(talk/contribs)} 16:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, what do you mean? —DerHexer (Talk) 16:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank

For reverting vandalism to my user page. --Guinnog 17:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nichts zu danken. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doch, dass war sehr schön von dich! --Guinnog 19:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Immer wieder gerne. Also eigentlich ja nicht. Du weißt schon, was ich meine. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 19:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page vandalism

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my user page! By the way, you really need to archive your talk page :p --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 18:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. … I wanted to archive my talk page when it has about 80 to 90 headlines. In this way I handle it on my German talk page, too. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! Thanks again --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 19:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

Every time I try and revert something, I see you've beaten me! *Hmph* I'm pretty new to vandalfighting, but it sure passes the time does it? I'll be seeing you around. Best wishes Lollipop Lady 19:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, same here. Except I don't use a tool (though I'm seriously considering), I manually revert. --24.136.230.38 19:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should have a fast internet connection and a fast browser. And of course experience counts. ;) You can use programms like WP:VF or WP:TWINKLE. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon article discussion

A relevant discussion is going on at Talk:Dragon#External_links. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 20:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV on 199.176.181.4

Thank you for making a report about 199.176.181.4 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. —dgies^t_c 18:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user vandalized after my final warning. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those appear to have the same timestamp so it's not clear the warning was recieved before the vandalism. —dgies^t_c 18:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know. The IPs are allowed to vandalize article in the same minute? I don't believe it. Is it more important to look at the timestamps than on the edits? I reverted two times, I warned two times, now there is a third vandalism. I think it's clearly that it was a vandalism after the final warning. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!!!

I'm sorry! I had an ADHD attack. It's been some time. I think I am learning how to controll it. Deadlocks 18:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I thought so. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey vandals

No need to warn those guys, several sysops are watching that page and blocking the socks on sight. Keep on reverting, though, good work :) – Riana ^ऋ 18:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I don't or just two or three times warn IPs, users and so one it's not correct, too … look at my page. But if it's a permant vandal I report him recently to the AIV. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks for the userpage revert... i put the ip through AIV due to numerous vandalisms, hopefully it'll all work out. thanks again! Matthew Yeager 18:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and thanks for reporting the IP. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

again, awesome team work for 66.244.203.245 Matthew Yeager 19:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My, my... Aren't we the quick one?

You've beaten me to about five or six incidents of vandalism by now, by such a short margin of time that WP software doesn't catch is as an editing conflict. My reversion just sort of disappears.

Of course, by the time you've read this I'll have nailed the next one while you've been reading this. Distraction for the win! Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 19:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

;) —DerHexer (Talk) 19:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not really trying to create a distraction...

I thought I might just create a distraction like above by doing the following:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You deserve it for beating me time and time again on reverting vandalism. By the way, how are you doing it, is it a tool or an admin thing? Lupins tool may be brilliant, but it sure aint fast enough to catch a vandal before you! Just looking at your contribs for today is impressive! CONGRATULATIONS!!!

by the way, this isn't a reason to give up! you're doing a great job! Stwalkerster 19:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) I'm using WP:VF and WP:TWINKLE. I'm not an admin here, but on de.wp where I got a lot of experience fighting vandalism. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]