User talk:Denhamd2

Image copyright problem with Image:Jims-diary.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jims-diary.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Beechlawn crest.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beechlawn crest.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beechlawn Rovers F.C.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beechlawn Rovers F.C., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable parks team: see dropdown menu at Dublin Amateur FL site. Content of article blatant hoax: "references" are not from a reliable source, and ref.#1 claims that club plays in FAI 'A' Championship which is easily verifiable as incorrect.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Struway2 (talk) 11:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beechlawn Rovers

The article Beechlawn Rovers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this is a hoax - see talk page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IrishIndependent.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IrishIndependent.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC) JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop inserting false information in Wikipedia, as you did in your hoax article Beechlawn Rovers and in this edit falsifying an image in the Irish Independent article to support your hoax. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 08:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Beechlawn Rovers

Hi there Denhamd2! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Beechlawn Rovers. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD G3. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Beechlawn Rovers, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Rafael Benitez.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Rafael Benitez.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 13:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rafael Benitez.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rafael Benitez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerry Adams Sinn Féin.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gerry Adams Sinn Féin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for introducing false information and faked images into Wikipedia. You altered File:Rafael Benitez.JPG to make File:Rafael Benitez.jpg, and File:Gerry Adams Sinn Féin.jpg to make File:Gerry Adams Sinn Féin.JPG, presumably so as to show yourself or your friends grinning in the background. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AndyReidLikesCake.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AndyReidLikesCake.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Beechlawn crest.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Beechlawn crest.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jackl 12:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Police2010.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Police2010.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 09:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brick, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. McGeddon (talk) 09:54, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Smashedwindow.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Smashedwindow.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Parishands.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Parishands.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 12:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eoghan.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eoghan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maxi Rodríguez, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Racism in association football, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 15:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kenny Dalglish have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Liverpool F.C., did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ian Rush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]