User talk:Dencoolast33

Welcome

Hi, I noticed your edits, welcome to Wikipedia. WP:WELCOME is a good link for going through the basics of getting started with editing, I noticed you did not use a reference for your edits on History of Sweden, one of the most important things on Wikipedia is using references so that people can verify the content that is written, see WP:CITE for more information. Once again welcome, and good luck! TylerBurden (talk) 05:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sorry. Ill keep that in mind in the future! Thanks for the edvice. 94.254.62.191 (talk) 08:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from List of wars involving Sweden. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Result

Hello, I would first like to thank you for creating the Swedish intervention in Persia article. How did you find out that it was "eventually a persian victory" ? Gvssy (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The thanks is appritiated. The Allies eventually left Persia and Persia did eventually get rid of the insurgents, so i figured that it could be counted as an eventual persian victory.

Du kan prata svenska om du känner dig mer bekväm i ditt modersmål. Dencoolast33 (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tack så mycket. 🙏🏻 Gvssy (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battles of Kazerum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battles of Kazerum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battles of Kazerum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

This is not OK. Please read the guideline WP:Canvassing, specifically the section 'Votestacking'. T*U (talk) 15:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay im sorry. I thought it was okay since my opponents did did it. Its in swedish, but right under "enwp". Dencoolast33 (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that may also be in a gray zone towards canvassing. However, the difference is that the posting in sv-wiki was linked to all partisipants in the Swedish discussion, while you only linked to the one editor that you thought might support your side. That is votestacking. Perhaps not a serious offense, but please avoid doing it again. Happy editing! --T*U (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks Dencoolast33 (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Atlantic

Sweden was not involved in the same way as Norway in the Battle of the Atlantic or World War II, claiming that they were is just false information. No declarations of war against Sweden was made and nor did Sweden declare war on any other nation, this is basic history. As for what happened to the merchant navy according to the source, by being leased or "för brittisk räkning" refers to contributing to maintaining trade routes in the Atlantic, this did not invlove participating in military operations, either overt or covert under Swedish flag. Krigsseglare was not a solider and they were not involved in any military actions as combatants for the Allies or Sweden. Lejdtrafiken was commercial operation, involving foreign trade and it was for the most part respected by both the Axis and the Allies. The merchant vessels were sometimes escorted by the Swedish Navy but these operations were not part of any military campaign as Sweden was neutral during the war.

As for Militärhistorisk Tidskrift, I guess you read the chapter "Svenskar i utländsk uniform" p.171-174 and made your own conclusions from it again. The title of the chapters says it all. There is nothing that backs up your claims there. The source says that 15,000 Swedish citizens went into service in foreign countries either by will or force during the world wars, but the source don't specify which powers nor which kind of "force" that was used. The fact that Swedes fought in Finland and for the Axis and Allied powers is no secret but these were volunteers, no regularly Swedish soldiers took part in World War II. 8,000 sailors were part of commercial enterprises, this was not a breach of the Swedish neutrality but could be described as morally controversial in some cases.

You need to stop cherrypicking. You can't put your own version of history on Wikipedia, you have been warned about this before by several experienced editors. A lot people uses this site for serious education and information gathering and they will be misinformed when they read what you write. Shellwood (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sweden leased their merchent navy to the british in the same way as Norway did which is on the list of participants, yet, when Sweden is included its cherrypicking? The Swedish sailors werent volunteers either as you stated, rather, they were leased by the Swedish government (again, in the same way as Norway leased their navy). It does not matter if they were just apart of commercial enterprisis either as the only Norweigian involvement was through said enterprise too (again, the same way as Norway).

Saying that the Swedish merchant navy was not involved in any campaigning is very false too.

Convoy ON 122
~~Operation Rheinübung~~ (upon further inspection)
Convoy OB 318
Convoy SL 125

Here are just some of the battles with the Swedish merchent navy involved, but nevertheless, you dont have to reply as im not going to revert your edit without your blessing. Dencoolast33 (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Norway was at war, Sweden was not. Both warring and neutral countries need to maintain a foreign trade during the war. The reason why some Swedish merchant vessels were part of some convoys are because of the agreements that the Swedish government reached together with the Allied and Axis goverments, Lundberg mentions this in his book. These were not part of any military operations but commercial ones, they bring bananas, oil and coal home. Shellwood (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox swedish altercation during world war ii

Template:Campaignbox swedish altercation during world war ii has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DB1729^talk 18:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, im so sorry! I dident even know i published it, do what ever you want with it. Dencoolast33 (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dencoolast33. Thank you for your work on Skirmish at Sövde. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the interesting article; apologies for the delayed review - there is indeed a long backlog. The article is concise and clear; I've done some minor copy editing, expanded a url to a more complete web citation and adjusted the lede to include some key details. It would also be interested to hear how this incident might have affected relations between the relevant countries in 1944, although I suppose they moved on to other more weighty matters.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dencoolast33/sandbox List of battles involving my dog

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Dencoolast33/sandbox List of battles involving my dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that you could do whatever in your sanbox? But im not opposed to you deleting it. Dencoolast33 (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capture of Manuel Briones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Cristóbal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dencoolast33. Thank you for your work on Capture of the frigate Kilduin. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:

Thank you for reviewing it, and thank you for your contributions here on wikipedia! Have a good day too! Dencoolast33 (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swedish soldiers in the Congo Free State has been accepted

Swedish soldiers in the Congo Free State, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Samoht27 (talk) 20:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing it! I appretiate your work here on wikipedia. Dencoolast33 (talk) 06:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dencoolast33. Thank you for your work on Moroccan expedition (1843-45). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discord

Har du discord? TheJarlXIV (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nej, jag har aldrig riktigt beöhvt skaffa det. Dencoolast33 (talk) 15:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jaha okej, tänkte bara att det skulle vara kul att kunna konversera via det också! Men då vet jag TheJarlXIV (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

äsch, jag laddar väl ner det, du är ändå inte den första som har frågat mig. Dencoolast33 (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jag är dencol_ Dencoolast33 (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skickat vänförfrågan👍🙏 TheJarlXIV (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jag är royalizt TheJarlXIV (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skirmish at the Chukchi Peninsula for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skirmish at the Chukchi Peninsula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skirmish at the Chukchi Peninsula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dencoolast33. Thank you for your work on Tullberg Uprising. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lapland skirmishes

Hello, Dencoolast33,

Thank you for creating Lapland skirmishes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I couldn't find any references to "Lapland skirmishes" from my searches (including the references provided). Are we sure that this is a term that had notability amongst military historians, or, are we creating the term ourselves, which could be WP:OR? thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Svalbard conflict

Hello, Dencoolast33. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Svalbard conflict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]