User talk:DenGlad

June 2020

Hello, DenGlad. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Passcovery Suite, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment and recommendations, JBW. I apologize if I did something wrong or failed to comply with something. I do not have malicious intents, just insufficient experience. Having relations with the developing company, COI arises and I have to post a [contributor template] in the article, am I right?

AfC notification: Draft:Passcovery Suite has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Passcovery Suite. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, ~Kvng

September 2020

Hello DenGlad. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Passcovery Suite, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DenGlad. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DenGlad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fiddle Faddle 06:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: : Thank you for your detailed comments. They are useful for the understanding of Wiki principles, which I appreciate and for which people all over the world like Wikipedia.

I’m sorry that some links seemed to you general for the IT industry. There are none of them. To some extent all of them relate to Passcovery Suite. The number of links is conditional upon the structure of Passcovery Suite itself. The program includes modules of other "Single-Format Utilities" by Passcovery. Consequently, the number of links increased. Do you recommend reducing their number up to one per fact?

As I declared, when I confirmed the title to the images, I am really a trusted representative of the company, but I did not receive direct remuneration for the article preparation and placement. Could you please tell me how to display it on my page correctly?

AfC notification: Draft:Passcovery Suite has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Passcovery Suite. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 06:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Passcovery Suite (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There zero independent reliable sources that talk significantly about Passcovery Suite. There are press releases (not independent), list entries (not significant coverage), and download sites. References should tick all three boxes in order to demonstrate notability. Remove any references that don't even mention Passcovery, remove references that only say "Passcovery is a password software" and nothing more, and then please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Passcovery Suite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Passcovery Suite, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: : It’s a pity you took a decision to reject the article. I suppose I got a one-way ticket. By the way, it is not "password software", it is "password RECOVERY software", the references contain links to independent mentions and publications with software practical use, and the page about the program was prepared using the examples from Category:Utilities_for_Windows/Category:Shareware categories (strictly speaking, any example from these categories is just a utility for certain functions and assistance in something). In any case thank you for your opinion and the time you devoted to me. --DenGlad (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Passcovery Suite

Hello, DenGlad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Passcovery Suite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 13:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]