User talk:Deamonpen

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Deamonpen! Thank you for your contributions. I am Virophage and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Virophage (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Offi-46-3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Offi-46-3.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Esther Passaris

Hello Deamonpen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Esther Passaris for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 08:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Deamonpen, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Inessa Armand has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Erwin Rommel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erwin Rommel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiegel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Erwin Rommel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ananke (mythology)

added links pointing to Gaia, Orphism, Hydros and Vyacheslav Ivanov

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Margaret I of Denmark page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erwin Rommel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Marshall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rommel myth article

FYI, I just checked the GA reviewer's talk page and he has been absent due to personal matters; see his post: "On my absence" therein. Kierzek (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank alot, Kierzek, I didn't know.

Deamonpen (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[Ötzi]

Could you recheck your recent edit to [Ötzi]. I think there is a typo and it should read "flight an arrow" instead of "fight an arrow". Although, strangely, I can barely find any dictionaries that mention that used as a verb. Apparently I'm older than they are? (I do find a couple usages like this in specialist archery articles) Thanks. Shenme (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank a lot, Shenme. It was my stupid typo. Deamonpen (talk) 01:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More copyright issues

You still haven't absorbed the warning above. You've copied material directly from Peter Roberts[1] (a book which fails our criteria at WP:RS and should not be used as a source and from William Stiebing[2] where you slightly modified the text but that isn't enough. You also used someone writing on model boats as a source for " generally regarded by Egyptologists as one of the most successful pharaohs" - how does that make sense?

Some of your sources are published by Xulon and Lulu.com - both self-publishers - see WP:SPS. We need academic sources. Charles N. Pope is also self-published and clearly fringe, see his book about Atlantis.[3] Charlotte Booth is probably ok but we could do better, Cuppy is not ok for Egyptology. David Del Testa's specialty is "modern European and modern Southeast Asian history" so isn't an RS for this. Kerr seems ok. Doug Weller talk 13:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-My sentences that collect info from Roberts were short, which read as followed: "Roberts comments that Thutmose II was not the child of a royal princess, thus his marriage with Hatshepsut was needed to give his succession letigimacy" "Senenmut was the child's tutor, and according to other authors, possibly father" "Hatshepsut was born around 1508 BC, the daughter of Thutmose I and his primary wife Ahmose. She first lived in Karnak, and then Thebes, the vibrant capital of the empire. Peter Roberts opines that her childhood would have been spent in a military atmosphere, considering her father's many campaigns." I think I only used language that would make the readers thought immediately of Roberts' book in one instance, that was "Thebes, the vibrant capital of the empire" (seven words in total, and as I now know, Us copyright laws, while declaring that they don't protect short phrases, do not mention how many words would be considered short, but this experienced editor who has worked 20 years in the publishing industry advises that ten words or less would not get one sued; I know, quantity will matter less if it is a substantial part of the book that makes people buy it. I do not see the potential here). That was not even half the sentence, which was "Her early childhood was spent in Karnak, and later in Thebes, the vibrant capital of the empire." If this is a violation on copyrights, which I've not managed to find out that it is yet, I'm really sorry. It was not deliberate from me.

If the standard is that harsh, that even phrases are not acceptable, I think major parts of this Hatshepsut article, rated as B class (meaning references have been checked - as far as I know) are not much more modified in comparison with mine: For example, most of the Tyldesley parts

"Hatshepsut's numerous statues were torn down and in many cases smashed or disfigured before being buried in a pit."

Her cartouches and images were chiselled off the stone walls - leaving very obvious Hatshepsut-shaped gaps in the artwork

Thutmose - not only Egypt's most successful general, but an acclaimed athlete, author, historian, botanist and architect

The Oracle of Amun proclaimed that it was the will of Amun that Hatshepsut be pharaoh.

sporadic and haphazard, with only the more visible and accessible

the prolific builder part from Duncan

Officially, she ruled jointly with Thutmose III who had ascended to the throne

designed and implemented by Senenmut

... too many to list so why does this high standard only apply for me?

when dianaa made the complaint above, I was quite new, actually the inspiration for what i wrote were not from the website s/he listed but I did not know how to react.

-don't see any problem with Booth

-William H. Stiebing Jr.: I only added the sources to sentences written previously by others.

-I didn't know that xulon was self publishing. I will be more careful. I knew Lulu was self publishing but I saw that book by Darlow quoted by other authors as a respectable source

-Hatshepsut was a building Pharaoh, and many of her achievements mentioned in the articles are about buildings, construction techniques, the navy and things like that. Thus I don't think an expert on Egyptian vessels does any harm.

-Del Testa, when teaching at California Lutheran University, did teach World History courses. I don't see why having opinions from an author who studies world leaders in general and compares them is a bad thing?

-On Pope's huge website on ancient history, it seems he manages it as he is a member of United States Library of Congress. I feel that the person is thus notable. Can you point me to a source that criticises his works on Ancient Egypt? Egyptologists seem to have a tendendy to have an interest in what would be considered "non scientific" (religious) somewhere, so I don't take any particular effort to dig out whether other than their books on the topic, they have made some ridiculous comments somewhere. And where is the links to Atlantis?

-Cuppy was not from me. i only moved him to another position Deamonpen (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't reply properly until tomorrow. You are right he doesn't say Atlantis but Atlantans, but see this. I'm a member of the Library of Congress, nothing special about that. Our policy on copyvio is our policy, not anyone else's. More tomorrow. Doug Weller talk 19:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I meant you were talking about a book he wrote but it was only a stupid comment. but Ok, if you are a member of that library and you said so. You're welcome

Deamonpen (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that you are trying to avoid copyright violations. Basically, unless you quote, the text should be clearly your own words. That's our policy, which is distinct from copyright laws. See WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE.

If you think there are problems with the article you really need to take them up on the talk page.

As for Darlow, see this description He's clearly fringe (besides the fact I can't find any evidence of qualifications). Teaching world history doesn't make you an expert on Egyptology. Anything he knows he's gleaned from them. We should be using acknowledged experts in Egyptology. Again, how can someone who writes about boats be an expert on Egyptologists? You can take all these to WP:RSN and argue that they meet our criteria at WP:RS, but I'd advise you not to bother. Still, your choice. The Roberts book was written for students on the Higher School Certificate (New South Wales). Again, fails our criteria. He's not an Eygptologist. Why would we settle for sources by people without years of academic and practical experience in Egyptology? Doug Weller talk 15:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. I really did not know about the paraphrasing policies.

Thinking about Del Testa again, I now think regarding the specifics of events, real Egyptologists should be more respected, and thus I probably should not have used him regarding some details, but I think he should not be dismissed completely. because for a broader view of the situation, a look at the character of the subject, the place of hers/his in the world history, perhaps it's better to consider views from scholars with broader interests, even psychologists, social scientists... etc. I would think again about others. As for the statement (existed before I saw the article) that the subject has a rep as a great pharaoh, I have accumulated a lot of other sources but have not figured out a way to organise them yet. Deamonpen (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morgenthau Plan: your revert

If I am not missing something, your revert and subsequent additional edit restored a situation (which I had corrected) where footnote 94 still contains a URL in the title field of the citation template and footnote 95 and footnote 96 point to exactly the same URL:

--Boson (talk) 09:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry, originally the third link was mistakenly pasted into title: http://www.bpb.de/internationales/amerika/usa/10605/2-weltkrieg?p=all 10:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Deamonpen (talk)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Deamonpen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassess

Rommel myth, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Deamonpen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays
	Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas Deamonpen!!

Hi Deamonpen, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
–Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Deamonpen!

Happy New Year!

Deamonpen,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Erwin Rommel. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deamonpen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deamonpen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Best wishes for this holiday season! Thank you for your Wiki contributions in 2018. May 2019 be prosperous and joyful. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noël ~ καλά Χριστούγεννα ~ З Калядамі ~ חנוכה שמח ~ Gott nytt år!

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Deamonpen, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia, –Davey2010 ^{Merry Christmas / Happy New Year} 19:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xmas

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For adding useful edits to Wikipedia!!!! Jack90s15 (talk) 04:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.Deamonpen (talk) 04:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles N'Tchoréré, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 7th Panzer Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Deamonpen
	Hi Deamonpen, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year, –Davey2010^talk 00:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erwin Rommel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 7th Panzer Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Deamonpen
	Hi Deamonpen, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, –Davey2010^Talk 19:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at the Rommel page

Hi Deamonpen, I'm trying to follow the discussion, but it's at times confusing due to occasional lack of signatures. For example: I don't know about Poland, but I don't think.... From the context, it appears that it's your post, but there's no indent in the post that follows, plus it's only one signature for both of them. I wonder if you could look at your posts and add signatures where needed? I'd like to contribute to the discussion, but it's a bit difficult at this point. --K.e.coffman (talk) 15:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will try. We posted things too quickly so... sorry. Thanks for your attention to the topic.

Battle of the Spurs

The additions, reliant largely on mid 19th century sources, should have been raised on the talk page before being effected. Arguably, they have made a confusing and over-elaborated article even more so. Urselius (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to agree with Urselius. If 20th-21st century sources state the same thing, then by all means we should use those. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, would do so.Deamonpen (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor Max

I can live with the change here, but I have to say the attempt at art criticism in the edit summary is nonsense! Johnbod (talk) 14:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just repeated the impression I got from reading about the subject. His daughter Margaret thought the painting did not look like her father in normal conditions, and that Dürer exaggerated certain characteristics. On the other hand, some authors like Terjanian thought that the portrait was a very idealized portrayal of a man who was about to die very soon (and the next, more realistic portrait showed his corpse as very decimated). Anyway there is even a scholarly debate on Maximilian's appearance so a famous portrait will certain generate some noises, still...Deamonpen (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maximilian armour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albrecht of Brandenburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maximilian II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Netherlands Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip of Cleves.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Holy Emperor Maximilian I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brabant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matilda, Abbess of Quedlinburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wallhausen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question on the removal of my map from the HRE Page

Hey friend, I'm just shooting you a quick message wondering why you removed my map from the HRE wikipedia page under imperial reform in Feb 2022? I'm not mad or anything, I'm just curious. Was there something wrong with it and I should improve it or is there another reason.

Looking forward to hearing back from you, Cameron — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWiseBeluga (talk • contribs) 04:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it does not really correspond to the "Imperial Reform" period. Now that I think about it, it should be in the previous section rather than being removed completely. I've just reattached it. Thanks for this conversation. Deamonpen (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Otto III, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middelburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lodi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maximilian (miniseries), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Guinegate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara of Cilli

Hi Deamonpen. You added a reference to "Fößel 2017" to Barbara of Cilli, but the work isn't defined in the article. Could you add the needed cite, or let me know which work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was my mistake. It's Kondor reporting about the works of Fößel and others, not Fößel herself. Deamonpen (talk) 13:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth of Luxembourg

Well, I am not here to quarrel again. I just wanted to say that I agree if we leave the page as it is at the very moment, with your footnotes and so on. In the very text, you mentioned the archbishop of Esztergom did not crown her, and there was a confusion over it. So we should not rewrite the whole wikipedia that there were multiple female kings in Hungary. Let's let the article as it is now. Super20020917 (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will rewrite the other Wiki pages, at least the notable ones. If other female monarchs are treated with the same standards (any sign of "confusion" is treated as the evidence that their title is not Queen regnant/Monarch, but all events pointing to the periods they were treated as monarches are inserted just as "notes"), many would be just usurpers and not monarchs, including:

-Wu Zetian, who was not recognized as Emperor by her son/successor, was referred to as Empress Consort Wu (and and illegal usurper) by traditional Confucian historians.

-Margaret of Denmark, who never used the title of King or Queen regnant in Sweden and Norway

By the way, if you have other opinions, bring it to the Elizabeth of Hungary page and its Talk page.

-Deamonpen (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth of Luxembourg

For more stressing you could add that Elizabeth of Luxembourg was also crowned KING)))). Well, that will be ridiculous Super20020917 (talk) 18:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth of Luxembourg

See, Norden1990 with more than 45000 edits has also deleted your editssss! Because they are unpassable. So your sources are wrong. HAIL TO MARY, KING OF HUNGARY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Super20020917 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]