User talk:Dblama

Nomination of Ranjeet Baral for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranjeet Baral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjeet Baral until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kashmiri ^TALK 23:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

You've been previously asked about the moves you are making with the explanation "to make it easier for Nepalese nationals" and other such vague rationales. You don't seem to have addressed that or other aspects of your behavior that have been questioned. Please respond at the WP:ANI discussion that you've been alerted to above. —SpacemanSpiff 15:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you have seen this warning and continued to edit without showing any interest to communicate, any further infractions of policy will most likely be met with blocks without warning.—SpacemanSpiff 16:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Spaceman Spiff, I was going to reply to your message yesterday, but was unable to do so as I was having network problems after my last few edits. The moves I had made were because of the "error" in the names of the pages, i.e. the ones who had created them had done so incorrectly as the correct spelling is "Shumsher" and not "Shamsher" as is present in most of the articles such as Baber Shamsher Jang Bahadur Rana and Kaiser Shamsher Jang Bahadur Rana. Even some of the references of articles such as Chandra Shumsher JBR contain the same mistake. You may check in this link as proof of my claim, which is a citation for the article itself: [[1]]

Dblama 14:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

You need to take time to read our policies and in this case our manual of style. You are refusing to take any feedback from other editors and instead responding with attacks and vandalism such as this and this. Frankly, the only reason I'm not blocking you is that it's twenty days old, but any further disruptive behavior will result in blocks. —SpacemanSpiff 16:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 04:42, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]