User talk:Davidirvine894

July 2020

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nigel Dodds without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please see WP:DERRY regarding the name of the city, thank you. FDW777 (talk) 12:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nigel Dodds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. SuperGoose007 ^(Honk!) 21:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Dodds is not yet a lord, see Talk:Nigel Dodds#Lords. Or if you don't feel like reading that, see the parliament website, It normally takes several weeks from the time a potential new member is announced, by the government or the House of Lords Appointments Commission, before their actual appointment. Before anyone becomes a member, a title has to be agreed and legal documents called Letters Patent and Writ of Summons must be prepared As such, there is no need to update the article any further, thank you. FDW777 (talk) 22:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Troubles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 22:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Nigel Dodds article, as well as other Troubles related articles, is under a 1-revert-restriction, meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period.

Warning

You must stop editing at Nigel Dodds or any article related to him. Instead, discuss the issue at Talk:Nigel Dodds#Lords. This is an administrative warning: You will be blocked if you continue repeating your changes as that is edit warring. Johnuniq (talk) 10:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a rest you wierdo Davidirvine894 (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Nigel Dodds, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Again, the city is called Derry see WP:DERRY for guidance. FDW777 (talk) 16:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh fuck up you bellend Davidirvine894 (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User:FDW777—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martina Anderson have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Martina Anderson was changed by Davidirvine894 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882285 on 2021-06-11T17:20:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m stating facts, clearing a Fenian the way your getting on, wise up and get a life Davidirvine894 (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]