User talk:Davidhanson471

Welcome!

Hello, Davidhanson471, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Davidhanson471, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zupotachyon (talk ⋅ contribs) Ping me with {{SUBST:reply to|Zupotachyon}} 07:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Davidhanson471

A tag has been placed on User:Davidhanson471 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zupotachyon (talk ⋅ contribs) Ping me with {{SUBST:reply to|Zupotachyon}} 07:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Integrated Rubber Network Models (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It isn't entirely clear what the title of this draft is supposed to be. Is it Integrated Rubber Network Models? This draft doesn't establish that the topic of integrated rubber network models is notable.

This draft primarily refers to papers by the author. Have other polymer chemists commented on the notability of the author's publications?

This draft may be too technical, and needs a better introduction.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Davidhanson471, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models

Hello, Davidhanson471. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Integrated Rubber Network Models".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Davidhanson471. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models

Hello, Davidhanson471. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Integrated Rubber Network Models".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Davidhanson471. You have new messages at WP:HD.
Message added 02:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Septrillion (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Septrillion, I am quite confused by your comment. In the email that I received, there is a box labeled 'View message'. When I click on it, I am directed to 'WP:HD' and there I find the message 'the references do not adequately show the subject's notability'. Would you mind elaborating? Are you referring to the Wikipedia Page: /Rubber elasticity, or my addition under /models Integrated Network models? Certainly, Rubber elasticity must have been judged as 'notable' since it existed before I made my edit. Network models are the only ones that are actually relevant to the phenomena of rubber elasticity. Before I added my section, there was no discussion of these on the Rubber elasticity page at all. Early versions of network models, which are known to be deficient, are presented in every text book on polymer physics. Do you think that the subject's notability would be better established if I referenced text books and historical papers that address the subject of network models? I apologize if I sound argumentative but I don't understand how to proceed with this. Robert McClenon said that I could request an editor review of the modified article. I was asking how to do this? (Davidhanson471 (talk) 03:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

Click the blue button that says "Resubmit". Septrillion (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Integrated Rubber Network Models (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Rubber elasticity instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Integrated Rubber Network Models, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

•≈20+π^{(talk to me!)} 17:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]