User talk:Davidbray2

Thanx a lot

Just wanted to say congrats for adding so much to the Spill.Com page I created. And for defending it on the "Articles for deletion" page. It just sucks that for some reason the administrators keep looking for a reason to keep deleting it over and over again. I tried to get it up again just now, and twenty minutes later it was deleted again. Unbelievable huh?

Okies

Should have posted your link, i hope you're watching. All we need is external links. i know IGN put them on their website, we just need to ask Korey for any reviews of them, controversy, links in third party, and anything in the media. If the website does not have spill.com in its address bar we need it. I have a copy saved to word, not completely up to date but its ready and waiting when we have it sorted.

Gottcha

You're right. They're probably on the lookout for me and just waiting for the page to pop up again so they can delete it. I've got a new stategy, the next time I create the page I think I'll do it under a different title. Maybe: Spill (Website). That way they won't automatically be on the lookout. It's great that you've got all those references lined up. I tried to add some myself but I just couldn't seem to figure out how to do it (the same case when it comes to adding images).

I'll try creating it as Spill.Com - with more info bringing it up to date - one last time sometime soon. So if you happen to see it up again be ready to add all those references and links.

Once again, thanks loads for helping out. : ) Peace.

Teknolyze (talk) 22:32, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spill.com

I'll repeat parts of what I said to Teknolyze to you, too:

If you want the article to exist, the AfD told you what you need to do: provide citations to reliable sources covering the website. Not PR reprints or passing mentions, but actual third-party extensive content about the website. If you can produce that, the article has a greater chance of remaining on Wikipedia.

Reposting the exact content will not do. If you choose to be deceptive and create the article under a different name so you can't be found, that article will also be deleted and you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Reposting to the exact same name is also disruptive and may result in you being blocked. You have been warned, so don't do it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that we can not change back the spill page to what it used to be, to what you tried to change it too because the history section on you version is a blatant copy and paste from an article I cited in my version, http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A603828. I appreciated your contributions but putting it back to what it was with this history, will get the page deleted quickly just like it did before. Smithers45 (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spill.Com

A tag has been placed on Spill.Com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Spill.com deletion reversal

Re your message: I started the discussion to delete the article, but did not close the discussion or delete the article. The closure and deletion was done by Cirt (talk · contribs). The awarding of a 2009 Podcast Award would qualify Spill.com per the notability guidelines. You may either recreate the article at Spill.com (that is the correct name per Wikipedia naming conventions, not Spill.Com) or you can ask Cirt (talk · contribs) about restoring the deleted revisions to your user space so that you can work on the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]