User talk:David Goutham

Ankit

Hello. Your recent edit to Ankit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how can I confirm it David Goutham (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't "confirm it" you need to follow the instructions above- Arjayay (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think I now understand what you were saying - as explained you need to read the relevant notability criteria and decide if the person meets those, before writing the article, as if they do not meet the criteria, the article will not be accepted. However, until the article has been written and accepted, please do not re-add the name to any lists - Thank you- Arjayay (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ankit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
The need for a person to have their own article before adding them to a list was clearly explained to you above - Arjayay (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ankit. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Goutham, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi David Goutham! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ankit Mina

Hello, David Goutham. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ankit Mina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ankit Mina

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ankit Mina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 16:08, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ankit Mina

Hello, David Goutham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ankit Mina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]