User talk:David-dalus
David-dalus, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi David-dalus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC) |
The Secret of Nimh
[edit]This is your last warning. Refrain from edit warring or you will be reported. LittleJerry (talk) 03:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reported you here
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LittleJerry (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Edit war
[edit]Your recent editing history at The Secret of NIMH shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleJerry (talk • contribs)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. LittleJerry (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)August 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Monkeybone
[edit]Add this sentence, "The scene then cuts to an animated sequence where the banquet's attendants are revealed to be monkeys in diguise.", after the final sentence in the plot summary so it can have context.
Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed
[edit]Add "ly" to the word "miraculous" in the plot summary's final paragraph and change the "and" before "celebrate" in said paragraph to "as they".
Babe: Pig in the City
[edit]Remove "the Sheep-Pig" after "Babe" in the first sentence of the plot summary.
Barnyard (film)
[edit]Change "the only surviving members of the herd" in the third paragraph of the plot summary to "its only survivors", then change the word "double-crossed" in its fourth paragraph to "deceived".