User talk:Davdotfam

October 2020

Hello, I'm Transcendental36. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bukonla Adebakin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Transcendental36 (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oluwafemi Ogunsanya (October 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Usedtobecool were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davdotfam! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Oluwafemi Ogunsanya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Oluwafemi Ogunsanya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://thebeesng.com/team/oluwafemi-ogunsanya/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello Davdotfam. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Davdotfam. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Davdotfam|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Davdotfam, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your edit to Bukonla Adebakin has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. bonadea contributions talk 18:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davdotfam! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article Creation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomike Adeoye

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tomike Adeoye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Enjoyer of World^💬 02:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tomike Adeoye moved to draftspace

Promotional vanity page. Vet through AfC. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomike Adeoye (2) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomike Adeoye (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tomike Adeoye (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tomike Alayande moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tomike Alayande, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nupamjo (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citations are being added and you can check the links to verify them. kindly verify before you move it next time. Cheers Davdotfam (talk) 05:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly revert your actions as the page is still under edit.

I'm waiting as it needs to be completed perfectly. Davdotfam (talk) 06:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomike Alayande (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Current reference quality is poor. Duplicate references also need to be merged.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomike Alayande and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tomike Adeoye

An article you recently created, Tomike Adeoye, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?)

The text is marginally less promotional than the draft you abandoned after submitting it (Draft:Tomike Alayande) but it is still very promotional and few (if any) of the sources are acceptable for a Wikipedia article. I've moved your draft to Draft:Tomike Adeoye; please work on this or the first draft, but do not create another copy in mainspace, please. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page, but don't move it to mainspace yourself. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you know it is not suitable, why not give feedbacks on how to improve it instead of moving it? you people will just be beahving irrational. A new page, why can't you confirm if the citations are from reliable and independent sources. Davdotfam (talk) 16:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You received feedback: the article needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. The rational thing to do would have been to nominate it for deletion, but that takes a lot of time and effort from your fellow volunteers, so I decided to give you another chance to work on the article in draft space. And now you have received even more feedback on the draft (below). Happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 17:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomike Adeoye (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Immediately submitted after draftification without any attempt to address the issues (see also Draft:Tomike Alayande about the same person, which has also been declined).

There is no actual claim to notability in the article.

At least seven of the sources are junk content scrapers and/or generally unreliable sources.

Language like "married her heartthrob", "welcomed a child", "award-winning" is promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomike Adeoye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for you review and feedbacks, I have removed sentences that were previously highlighted as an advertisement and added more citations from an independent sources. I look forward to getting it approved. Thank you and if there is any other way to adjust let me know. Davdotfam (talk) 08:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomike Adeoye (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no evidence for " media personality, television host and actress"?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomike Adeoye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is an evidence for media personality, television host and actress and I have even attached it below here for your perusal.

https://tribuneonlineng.com/everyone-with-a-smart-phone-is-a-potential-millionaire-tomike/

https://hyrish.com/2019/04/15/jenifas-diary-actress-tomike-alayande-adeoye-shares-lovely-photo-of-herself-and-her-handsome-husband/

https://guardian.ng/life/whatsnew-entertainment-celebrity-gist-and-so-on/ndanitv-releases-official-trailer-for-phases-2/

https://awards.yafri.ca/the-class-of-2020-ghanas-dela-michel-and-nigerias-tomike-adeoye-to-unveil-nominees-for-the-future-awards-africa-2020-this-sunday/ Davdotfam (talk) 10:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But there is no content in the draft about this? Theroadislong (talk) 10:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is, I just added two more now to it. Kindly let me know if I can send for approval again. Thanks for your review Davdotfam (talk) 11:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does, and that's why I added the links to some of the movies she has been featured and if you checked the wikipedia page with the link below; you will see it there, she was Tania. for the Television host, she was the host for Ynaija Future awards which I indicated in the reference number 2 where she unveilled the nominees, I have added it below as well. And from the independent source below, you will see it was mentioned that she is an actress and Television host. Let me know any adjustments and if I can resubmit now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenifa%27s_Diary Davdotfam (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the draft does not explain how she is a television host and actress? Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does, that's whatI explained earlier now, I can't use wikipedia as reference and in the links with the references, it was stated there and wikipedia confirmed it. I have added the links that explained it to the draft. Kindly check, looking forward to your response. Thank you. Davdotfam (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having an unsourced mention in another Wikipedia article is useless. You will need to suggest how she passes WP:NACTOR.. Theroadislong (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I don't think there is another way to prove that for now, can I just live it as Nigerian Media personality and Television host? I will remove the actor now and can I submit for approval now? Thank you for your help. This is my first page I'm creating. Davdotfam (talk) 12:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I await your response for further actions, thank you for the review. Davdotfam (talk) 13:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to re-submit, I don't think they are notable, but I won't review again. Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! can you help me check where I need to improve? I will really appreciate Davdotfam (talk) 14:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I await your response, I don't want to resubmit till I'm sure have addressed all the issues. Davdotfam (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tomike Adeoye has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tomike Adeoye. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 18:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I've corrected all and used a more reliable independent sources. You can check the draft Davdotfam (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomike Adeoye (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomike Adeoye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 13:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tomike Adeoye

Hello, Davdotfam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomike Adeoye, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tomike Alayande

Hello, Davdotfam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomike Alayande, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tomike Adeoye

Hello, Davdotfam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tomike Adeoye".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Josh,

I have edited it to the wikipedia's standard but still it was not approved. Davdotfam (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tomike Alayande

Hello, Davdotfam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tomike Alayande".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomike Adeoye (July 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has been nothing but promotional over the course of nine or so declines, and isn't getting better.

Greenman (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Sekoni (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Sekoni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]