User talk:DataDarkLBMA
It's been determined that the outcome of the investigation was 'inconclusive' so let's just evaluate my edits from an objective standpoint of a new editor unless further evidence reveals the need to investigate further or block. Thanks!- DataDarkLBMA (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Austrian School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 11:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- 'Unconstructive'??? To whom??? It was in direct response to a request on the talk page and is directly relevant to the discussion and that secion! Have you even read the ref? DataDarkLBMA (talk) 11:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerenetalk 10:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Blocked as a sock puppet
[edit]This account has now been Confirmed by CheckUser as a sock puppet of Karmaisking (talk · contribs) and has now been indefinitely blocked. Regards, –MuZemike 22:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)