User talk:Karmaisking

Unblock request

[ Moved from User:Karmaisking by MastCell]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karmaisking (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Probably neater to view it on the MadMak'sBack talk page. It was very long, had multiple links and didn't work well in this boxed format. It read like a long rant by a psychopath bent on revenge. It still is, but slightly less so. I also needed to make some amendments/corrections. Please view it there and make your comments here. Obviously, if the answer is in the negative MadMak'sBack can be blocked. I will not edit on any WP page until a judgment has been finalized. I can assure you of that.

Decline reason:

I see no reason here, or on the talk page of your other blocked account, that assures us that the same problems that caused you to be blocked will cease. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: I've moved this request here, to the usertalk page, from Karmaisking's userpage. I will make no comment on its content and allow a less jaundiced admin to review its merits. MastCell ^Talk 00:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

To facilitate any administrative discussions, refer also to:

Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Karmaisking

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Karmaisking

Also note that this user has, on various occasions, been extremely vulgar and rude, made personal attacks, and has threatened various long term contributors.

More information is available in the entry on this user in Long term abuse.