User talk:DashaHouston401

This is DashaHouston401's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, DashaHouston401, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DashaHouston401/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DashaHouston401! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:DashaHouston401/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:DashaHouston401/sandbox. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adham Yusupov (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adham Yusupov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 18:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Adham Yusupov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Adham Yusupov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 18:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Adham Yusupov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Adham Yusupov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Adham -Yusupov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Adham -Yusupov, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 14:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. .

This also applies to your disruptive page moves. bonadea contributions talk 14:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think I'm just doing this for no reason. No one is helping me figure out why it keeps getting deleted. My boss is consistent that I get this done. I've rewritten it several times! DashaHouston401 (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it "inappropriate"?? DashaHouston401 (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BOSS orWP:COI, it is "Inappropriate" to make disruptive or promotional pages. (talk page stalker) Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Viva la Vendetta)} 14:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is it promotional ? because I'm talking about his career? DashaHouston401 (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is always inappropriate to create promotional articles, drafts and other pages, whether there is a COI or not. --bonadea contributions talk 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are STILL not telling me how it is promotional ? DashaHouston401 (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the post below and make the mandatory disclosure. --bonadea contributions talk 15:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate because it is unambiguously promotional. In addition, you have not declared the fact that you are getting paid to edit; you must make that declaration, and you may not create articles in mainspace about your boss. I will add some more info about that below. --bonadea contributions talk 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines also state " it can also drive new editors away from Wikipedia if they believe that their time and hard work spent writing an article was simply tagged as an "advertisement" with a notice left on their talk page, and without any sort of offer of assistance or feedback given" So telling me to "stop or ill get blocked" is so rude and unnecessary and extremely unhelpful. All i asked was simply how was in promotional so I can fix it. saying its "unambiguously promotional" is no help. I never said my boss was paying me to write this article about him, anyways thanks for your "help"!! DashaHouston401 (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are being directed as a part of your employment to edit Wikipedia (which you said above that you are, when you stated My boss is consistent that I get this done), that is considered paid editing, and you must both make the mandatory disclosures as described here, and follow the conflict of interest editing guidelines. Your next edit must be either making the paid disclosure or asking for assistance with doing so. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you messaging me. I'm not worried about that. That was not the problem before I DISCLOSED THAT INFORMATION! DashaHouston401 (talk) 19:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am messaging you because I deleted the promotional article you wrote (and which, if you read the COI rules, you should have created as a draft, not in mainspace.) The next step, if you continue to make edits (which includes arguing here) instead of making the required disclosure on your user page, is that I will block you from editing. I would prefer not to have to do that, so I warned you instead of going right to that, but it's ultimately up to you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t care. Get a life and stop harassing me DashaHouston401 (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Adham Yusupov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Adham Yusupov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 14:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, DashaHouston401. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. .

Before you make any other edits (including responding to other talk page posts), you must address this. bonadea contributions talk 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]