User talk:Darthvader1
liquids banned from commercial airlines
[edit]Stop deleting my posts on the August 10th incident. The TSA has very truly and seriously banned all liquids in checked and carryon baggage due to that terror plot in the UK. As far as I know, this ban is permanent and will NEVER be lifted or eased. And how long do you reckon it will be before the TSA passes new rules requiring strip searches of every single passenger at the airport? What happens when all airports becomes exactly like Alcatraz prison? What if the TSA were to even make you check everything including car keys, credit cards, etc? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darthvader1 (talk • Darthvader1 05:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- First, please sign talk page postings with ~~~~.
- Second, what edit are we talking about here? From the talk page comment above, I see that I reverted one edit of yours, in the 2001 article, on October 8th. And I explained my reasons for that particular deletion. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 00:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Your editorial commentary about the TSA
[edit]You seem to be upset about the TSA liquid restrictions. Fair enough, I'm not thrilled about them myself. But Wikipedia is not the place to vent your frustration with the TSA. I've removed your editorial commentary from August 10, 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, and 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot security reaction. Please review our policies regarding neutral point of view and original research, and please try to keep the editorial commentary to yourself. Thanks. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 05:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Your email
[edit]Hey, I'm annoyed about the liquid restrictions too. I never check a bag when I fly, but the last time I flew for business, I had to check a bag because I travel with contact lens solution. I ended up cooling my heels at the baggage carousel for 35 minutes waiting for the bag to show up. I'm not about to argue that those silly rules make sense. My only interest here is to keep the Wikipedia articles focused on objective facts, in line with our neutral point of view policy. As someone said once, I feel your pain...but this isn't the place to vent about it. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 06:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just reverted your edits of "Fantasia" back to "Fantastica", because the article primarily follows the book spelling. Just so you know. Annie D (talk) 02:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
RE: TORRO scale
[edit]That content was removed because it was unsourced. Some of the (unsourced) content was unnecessary or misleading. And as for the changes and additions to the TORRO scale parameters, sourcing is absolutely necessary if those are to be maintained. Evolauxia (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Beaufort scale
[edit]Your edits to Beaufort scale are unsourced. Content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. Please provide sourcing. Evolauxia (talk) 18:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
GA Reassessment of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (NES)
[edit]Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (NES) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. MuZemike 21:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films
[edit]
|
| Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! —Erik (talk • contrib) 03:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC) |
Dupage county/water slide
[edit]It doesn't matter because that article will be deleted as soon as someone so inclined sees it. I'm not a deletionist, so it doesn't bohter me, but the article is totally unsourced. Unless you can find some newspaper articles to back up the content, the article will almost certainly be deleted. You can re-add the link to Dupage County, but that will only draw attention to your article and hasten its demise. Sorry. — goethean ॐ 23:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Link
[edit][1] — goethean ॐ 23:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Darthvader1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Darthvader1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)