Talk:Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Result: delisted MuZemike 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of delisting myself, I am putting this up for reassessment to see if it can be salvaged as a GA and since there has been a couple of recent edits to the article. Here are the reasons I think this should be delisted:

Many of the sources used to verify the information is not reliable, such as arcade-history.com (no editorial oversight, anyone can literally edit it, kind of like Wikipedia), thehouseofgames.net (same reason as arcade-history.com), Nintendo Land (fansite), GameFAQs (no editorial oversight, any user can post a review), toptenreviews.com (nothing I can find there), theRaider.net (likely not, but more importantly, nonexistant - I get a 404), and Gamespot (while this is considered reliable in general, reader/user reviews, like with GameFAQs are not considered reliable; it needs official reviews by actual qualified editors)
The last third of the Plot and Gameplay section describes over-detailed gameplay instructions (see Wikipedia is not a game guide).
Prose needs improvement. There are lots of weasel words and peacock terms floating around in the article.

MuZemike 20:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably nothing that can be done given the new standards. Might as well make it pour and nominate Major League Baseball (video game) as well. Cheers, CP 21:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]