User talk:Darncoolcreeper

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus was changed by Darncoolcreeper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864091 on 2023-06-25T10:59:17+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Anna Richardson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am just stating the facts. Anna Richardson did create a show called “Naked Education” in which adults stripped fully naked in front of children. Don’t you think this should be mentioned on her wikipedia page? Darncoolcreeper (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Darncoolcreeper (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darncoolcreeper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was simply adding some informationDarncoolcreeper (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You violated the Biographies of Living Persons policy and seem to be here to smear a particular individual, not build this encyclopedia. Take your bigotry elsewhere, you are not welcome here. 331dot (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darncoolcreeper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What bigotry? Please search “naked Education” and you will see that Anna Richardson has actually made a show called this. So why not add it to her page?Darncoolcreeper (talk) 12:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need reliable sources to back up your edits. If you do not see anything wrong with your edits, thee are no grounds to remove the block. PhilKnight (talk) 16:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's not "her page", but an article about her. And I'm more referring to your other edits and attempted edits that were blocked. 331dot (talk) 12:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what edits are you talking about? Can you please tell me specifically? I have not said anything that was not true, will you add this information to the article about her at least?Darncoolcreeper (talk) 12:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not every statement needs to be an unblock request. No I will not edit for you- you may only use this talk page to request unblock, while you are blocked. I am referring to all your prior edits, both successful and those that were blocked by filters. You violated the biographies of living persons policy by making unsourced claims about a person. I can't repeat them as I too would be violating the policy but I can say that you made a serious accusation about this individual without a citation that they were convicted of a crime. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn’t letting me reply normally for some reason. I thought it was obvious that anna did that. That is why I didn’t put a source. Which prior edits did I make that were wrong? Can you tell me what they were? I was not trying to do anything wrong. Darncoolcreeper (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All information about living people requires a citation to a reliable source. We don't put what is "obvious" as we have a verification requirement. You accused someone of a criminal act without offering a source that they were convicted of a crime. 331dot (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add the source too but it wouldn’t let me. It deleted when I put the naked Education show Darncoolcreeper (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a mainstream news story that this person was convicted of a crime in a court of law, you should have no difficulty posting it. Given that this person is a TV presenter it should be big headline news if a court deemed them the terminology that you used. 331dot (talk) 14:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This world is so corrupt that the police do nothing. Research it for yourself. Adults stripped naked in front of children. Do you think that is okay? Darncoolcreeper (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I think about it is not particularly relevant, nor is what you think about it. Not every instance of nudity is inappropriate. Go into any art museum. 331dot (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, if you have a mainstream reliable source that this person was convicted of a crime, let's see it. I take "the police do nothing" as evidence that you don't have such a source. Your definition of "corruption" is deeply in error. 331dot (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you trying to cover this up? I posted a factual statement about a show that she made and you deleted it. Why don’t you want people to know about that show? Darncoolcreeper (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to stand on a street corner or use social media to tell the world what you want to say. This website is a project to write a curated encyclopedia that summarizes what independent reliable sources say about a topic, not a place for you to make unsourced accusations of criminal activity. When there is a conviction in a court of law, let us know. Until then, no, you will not be allowed to do what you wish to do. I have no additional comment. 331dot (talk) 19:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay but what about the tv show that she made? Why are you deleting that from her page? Darncoolcreeper (talk) 05:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This intercepted attempt alone suffices to get you blocked in perpetuity. I apologize for having used such a bland rationale when blocking you. Favonian (talk) 12:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t see what that link is going to it says not available so I don’t know why I am blocked Darncoolcreeper (talk) 12:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know what you wrote, you lack the skills needed to participate here. It should be pretty memorable. 331dot (talk) 13:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know what he is referring to specifically. Darncoolcreeper (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was suppressed so even I cannot view it any longer, but it is related to my comments above. 331dot (talk) 14:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits related to the San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus were also deeply offensive. 331dot (talk) 14:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How? I didn’t say anything about them. I just mentioned that some of them were registered sex offenders. That’s the truth. Darncoolcreeper (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In any event someone else will review your request. They will do as they see fit, but I oppose unblocking you without some sort of topic ban from articles dealing with sexual orientation or possibly BLPs. 331dot (talk) 15:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is a BLP? I wasn’t saying anything about sexual orientation though. Darncoolcreeper (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of Living People. I don't think you can be trusted to edit articles dealing with sexual orientation(such as the Gay Chorus). I don't have anything else to say. 331dot (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think that? I do not know what that has to do with anything Darncoolcreeper (talk) 18:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]