User talk:Darkburzum

July 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Anthrax (American band), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Rob van vee 07:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Slayer, you may be blocked from editing. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Anthrax (American band). - FlightTime (open channel) 18:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slayer

Please stop, the page does not idle at your version, let the discussion conclude before you make any of your changes. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Slayer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Darkburzum reported by User:FlightTime (Result: ). Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
See 144.172.168.245 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) - FlightTime (open channel) 00:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Symbolic (Death album). Rob van vee 08:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Slayer

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Celtic Frost. Binksternet (talk) 01:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Slut-shaming has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Slut-shaming was changed by Darkburzum (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950041 on 2017-10-22T15:58:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Slut-shaming, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Slut-shaming. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]