Jump to content

User talk:DarkAudit/Archives/2008/January

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rhapsody Rabbit.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhapsody Rabbit.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

NPWatcher....

seems to have screwed up your AfD submission, by replacing spaces in article names with "+" characters, and adding the AfD to the end of the days list rather than the top Mayalld (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that. I guess I'll stick with TW for AfD postings. DarkAudit (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Spark Fun Electronics review

Hello, You marked the Spark Fun Electronics as a speedy delete per CSD A7. I have done some re-work on the article to try and 'save' it from deletion. Does the article now qualify as an acceptable wiki entry? Thank you very much Lmc169 17:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

It's out of speedy range, but you will need some independent sources to show that the company meets notability guidelines per WP:CORP. DarkAudit (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you thank you thank you! i cannot thank you enough! Lmc169 17:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me about the nature of the league. I normally try to steer clear of AFDs to do with sports but there were few comments so I tried to get the ball rolling, glad someone could correct me though. I have changed my opinion on the matter and edited the AFD as appropriate. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)