User talk:Dapah1

Welcome!

Hello, Dapah1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Fernando Romero at TED.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fernando Romero at TED.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Fernando Romero at TED.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fernando at TED 2013.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Fernando at TED 2013.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Soumaya Museum in Mexico City.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Soumaya Museum in Mexico City.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:G20 Los Cabos International Convention Centre by FR-EE.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:G20 Los Cabos International Convention Centre by FR-EE.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fernando at TED in NYC.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fernando at TED in NYC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dapah1. You have new messages at File talk:Soumaya Museum in Mexico City.jpg.
Message added 17:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 17:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:G20 Convention Centre by FR-EE.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:G20 Convention Centre by FR-EE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:G20 Los Cabos Convention Centre.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:G20 Los Cabos Convention Centre.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Torre Cervantes in Polanco.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Torre Cervantes in Polanco.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bjarke Ingels Group may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jakob Lange

The article Jakob Lange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is WP:INHERITED from Bjarke Ingels Group

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jakob Lange for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jakob Lange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob Lange until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MrsSnoozyTurtle - thanks for looking at this! However, with all respect, I disagree with this deletion nomination. It is undisputable that Jakob fulfills 3/4 criteria for creatives according to wiki standards and a simple google search will show you that:

-he is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; and

-he is a person who is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; and

-he has played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, specific notable projects are attributed directly to him. Dapah1 (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I am removing the deletion proposal given you haven’t replied. Thanks. Dapah1 (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coup (film)

I've started an RM on the article talk page. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 16:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in Coup! - corrected spelling

Hi Dapah1,

Looking at the changes you've made in the article's text just a short time ago (=> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coup%21&diff=1231826744&oldid=1231180146):

=> corrected summarized to US spelling to be consistent with rest of wiki text.

According to Wikipedia's policy WP:SPELLING, Commonwealth English spelling is regarded just as acceptable as US English spelling. I'd be first to admit that mixing "summarise" and "summarize" side-by-side in the same paragraph (or even worse, in the same sentence) would look sloppy and inconsistent - but that was NOT the case with the changes made by me in "Reception" section, was it? So why do it? 😕

In addition to everything else, the article's WP:Lead now looks quite different from how leads of other film-related articles look (with information in the third paragraph you've just added typically placed in the article's opening paragraph and before the paragraph about film's premiere and release info)... 🤔

Cheers,

Szagory (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to mention quickly that I've moved the third paragraph into the lead's opening paragraph. 😉

But your changing the heading of "Premise" section to "Plot" still doesn't look like a proper description for WP:Plot to me - it's still just a brief outline of what the film is about, isn't it? With little in it about actual events of the film... So just as a suggestion, perhaps it makes sense to rename it back to "Premise" (with

tag added to it)? The last sentence in particular - about escalation "into boisterous class warfare." - appears to impart undue levity, and it makes for a rather abrupt ending of the section. 🤔

👉 I'd appreciate it greatly if you restored my original spelling of "summarise", mate - my making that correction myself would look petty and small-minded, but at the same time I would just never write "summarize", and those were my words written by me, after all.

Take care,

Szagory (talk) 19:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi again

thanks for the speedy response! all good. Its a U.S movie, hence why summarize felt more appropriate. I'm ok with switching it back. In terms of page structure - I looked at pages like Saltburn and a few other examples and additions seemed on par with those. I'm cool with what you proposed as well! 72.226.106.118 (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi user:Dapah1,

Just wanted to add quickly that after your removing words like "positive" from my changes (BTW, I chose to describe reviews as "positive" and "negative" on the basis of how reviews were rated on RT), selecting unnecessarily sensationalist and unduly positive words from "Bottom Line" of Leslie Felperin's review ("Fun! Amusing! Radical!") didn't look all that balanced and impartial to me (overall tone of her review is decidedly aloof and temperate) - so I selected her summarising words from => https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/coup_2023/reviews instead...

And I've already changed your "summarize" to "sum up" to put paid to all this linguistic malarkey. 😉

Have a good evening on your side of the Pond,

Szagory (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]