User talk:Danut1999

Ralph

Please refer to the list's talk page: Talk:List_of_We_Bare_Bears_episodes

There are no sources verifying Ralph should be placed at 3x05

Rubyaxles (talk) 16:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warrior

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Samurai Jack, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Your recent edits appear to be genre-warring. If you don't provide a citation to a reliable source for the genres, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Bright☀ 10:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Bright☀ 10:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Samurai Jack. Bright☀ 15:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danut1999. Thank you. Bright☀ 15:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported for genre warring at WP:AN3

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Danut1999 reported by User:BrightR (Result: ). You repeatedly change genres but you never ask for support on talk pages or try to discuss your edits. The unsourced changing of genres is such a common pattern on Wikipedia that a page has been written about it at Wikipedia:Genre warrior. If you wish, you can respond to this complaint at the noticeboard. If the pattern continues with no discussion by you you may be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and making unsourced changes to film genres

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at 2017 in film, you may be blocked from editing. Gaioa (talk) 17:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Danut1999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained dummy edits

Not sure what you are doing but it is drawing attention. Please desist unless you have some reason you would like to offer. Thanks... -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danut1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.