User talk:DannyPot

This is DannyPot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takahiro Sato (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Interviews are considered primary sources and therefore not independent or reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Takahiro Sato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Takahiro Sato, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapitalTokyo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takahiro Sato (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not notable by any accounts. See WP:ANYBIO. If argued for politician, see WP:NPOL for why not accepting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Takahiro Sato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Takahiro Sato, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused as to why this post has been rejected. There is an exact same post on the Japanese page at https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BD%90%E8%97%A4%E5%B4%87%E5%BC%98 This post was approved with out issue. I am trying to write a translated version of the above post. If necessary I can get more references but they are all in Japanese (and they all refer to the person in Japanese) there are no English references as yet. However, the references provided more than enough reference material about this person. Can you explain a little more please? DannyPot (talk) 05:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever yardstick that jawiki has to keep the article there may be different from what we have here on enwiki. See WP:OTHERLANGS for this.

References are definitely lacking. Ref 1 is a press release, thus considered as a primary source. Ref 2-4 are the same reference, and it is an interview and may be considered as primary source depending on the information it is cited for. See WP:INTERVIEW for this.

It is ok to use foreign language references on enwiki per WP:NOENG. Do provide a translated quote from the source when citing them for the ease of reviewers to review.

On the notability, as a businessman, he would need further sources to back his notability up per WP:ANYBIO. As a politician, so far the activities listed are considered as local politics level, and therefore is not notable (see WP:NPOL). However, if the article passes on the basis of his notability as a businessman, his political activities can still be included.

For future activities that are not set in stone, i.e. current language is that he 'plans to open [a school]' (sic), it shouldn't matter on wikipedia as an encyclopedia per WP:CRYSTAL, unless the plans have had received significant coverage.

Also it is not rejected, but declined. You can still send it in for submission after doing improvements to the article. A rejection meant that it will most likely not looked at by reviewers anymore. – robertsky (talk) 23:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I just wanted to expand on the automated comments above slightly. Thanks for declaring your connection to this subject on your userpage; however, the username you have selected is not compliant with our username policy - you will need to select a new username to edit here. You should also look at WP:PAID, which forms part of the terms of use of this website - if you are employed by the organisation that your username refers to, there are additional steps you need to take beyond simply declaring a COI. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 12:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DannyPot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The name has been changed and aproved. I believe this warrants unblocking. DannyPot (talk) 00:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have unblocked your account. You should read WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 10:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takahiro Sato (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last decline. If submitted again without addressing the issues, it may be rejected meaning the draft will no longer be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Takahiro Sato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Takahiro Sato, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2022 Hi, this last submission of this article was as a stub, not an actual article. I am wondering if this was reviewed as a stub. What advice can you give me regarding writing this up as a stub. I have read the information regarding stubs and believed it qualified as such. Any advice would be most welcomed. Thank you for your time. DannyPot (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Takahiro Sato

Hello, DannyPot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Takahiro Sato, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Takahiro Sato

Hello, DannyPot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Takahiro Sato".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]