User talk:Danncampbell

Culver-Stockton edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit because the new president shouldn't be in the Infobox quite yet. It makes it look like there wasn't a president before. If you'd like to put some info in the article somewhere down below about the new president, that would be better. I hope you continue to edit the Culver-Stockton article, and Wikipedia as well. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan^Talk 02:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I will soon update this article. Danncampbell (talk) 20:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

George Mowry

Dann,

It appears that you created the George E Mowry by copying and pasting the text from your browser page. Unfortunately, copying and pasting loses a lot. Now, none of the citations work anymore, and the article has no links - I've already fixed other problems, but fixing those two requires more knowledge of the topic. Is there an original page somewhere that you copied from? Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see where the page came from User:Danncampbell/sandbox. I'll be glad to assist in properly moving that page into article space. (Oiyarbepsy, you might need to redo some of your edits to get them integrated.) —C.Fred (talk) 15:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My question is what title should the article get? Does he usually publish with his middle initial, or should it be styled just George Mowry? —C.Fred (talk) 15:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a Google search of his works, I went with George E. Mowry. —C.Fred (talk) 15:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

George Mowry

I moved it correctly to its own entry. But one of you could capitalize mowry that would be super. Do any of you know how to do the summary box? I was the raw data for it but don't know how to create it. Of course it may not be necessary. Danncampbell (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been, and still is, at George E. Mowry. —C.Fred (talk) 13:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Danncampbell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

George mowry

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of George mowry, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: George E. Mowry. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, George mowry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, George mowry. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – George E. Mowry. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at George E. Mowry – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —C.Fred (talk) 13:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed some content from George E. Mowry without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You completely removed the text about Mowry and replaced it with material about Culver-Stockton college. —C.Fred (talk) 02:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey thanks! Danncampbell (talk) 02:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]