User talk:Dank/Archive 86
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dank. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | Archive 89 |
Happy New Year, Dank!
Dank,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Heh, that looks like my neighborhood today. Thanks for your competence and your kindness. - Dank (push to talk) 21:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Dank!
Dank,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Best wishes for the new year! - Dank (push to talk) 02:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Dank
Chris Troutman (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2024 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 go well for you.
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.
- Best wishes for the new year! - Dank (push to talk) 03:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Dank!
Dank,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Best wishes for the new year! - Dank (push to talk) 03:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
2023
 | |
| happy new year |
|---|
Thank you for the lamiid families! - Ukrainian colours for a reason. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, and I'm glad you enjoyed the list. - Dank (push to talk) 16:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Very Best
|
Best wishes for the holidays | |
| Wishing you and yours moderate merriment over the holiday season. ps, have been following your lists, and am deeply impressed; I mean visually they are stunning and so informative :) Ceoil (talk) 16:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC) |
- Always makes me smile to see your name ... and such a nice sentiment! Lists are underrated IMO in their ability to help people get up to speed on a new topic. If you have any opinions on this, one of these days, please come say something (good, bad or otherwise), even if it's just a drive-by comment, in one of my FLC noms ... hopefully that will ignite a conversation among reviewers about what makes a good (or bad) introductory or survey course (note the red link! incredible what Wikipedians aren't interested in, sometimes.) - Dank (push to talk) 16:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds like a plan to me Dan. One of the articles that cemented my admiration of what wiki was capable of, back in the day, was Language of flowers (which looking at now seems less than what it was in 2006, if you remember User:TimVickers). Ceoil (talk) 17:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Tim reverted an edit to that article in 2008, so I read that version ... very nice! - Dank (push to talk) 17:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds like a plan to me Dan. One of the articles that cemented my admiration of what wiki was capable of, back in the day, was Language of flowers (which looking at now seems less than what it was in 2006, if you remember User:TimVickers). Ceoil (talk) 17:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ok from a 20 minute scan am totally absorbed. I'll be watching. Ceoil (talk) 17:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wonderful. - Dank (push to talk) 17:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of List of lilioid families
Plant lists connections
Hey, just promoted the lilioid list, so that's another one done- the lamiid list will probably be following soon as well. Seems like your FLC nominations get a lot of reviewer attention, which is great! I had a thought when I was looking it over, which I don't know how useful it is: in the mammal lists I've been doing, there's a box at the bottom ({{Mammal lists}}) that connects all of the lists, and as I've been creating more lists its been getting structured more and more to mirror the hierarchies of groupings in mammalia. Would it make sense to have such a template for the plant lists you've been doing? You do have that seealso template at the top that links the three monocot lists, but there's nothing that then links to reader off to e.g. the eudicots lists you've been doing, or just angiosperms in general, and it doesn't seem like an angiosperm/flowering plants lists template would be awry. Also, while I was writing this, I realized there's actually not a lot of links from the "order" pages to your lists; unless I missed something, Lilioid monocots doesn't link to your lilioid list, nor Asterids to anything. I tend to add main/seealso links like Afrosoricida#Phylogeny to the afrosoricid list, so I was surprised. Anyways, hope to see more lists coming through FLC from you! --PresN 01:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'll get to work on that. Thanks much for your help, it means a lot. - Dank (push to talk) 02:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- For a relevant navbox, I can't do better (and shouldn't try!) than Template:Angiosperm orders, which appears on pages such as rosids. For incoming links from other pages, probably "See also" links would work (in cases where most of one of my lists is relevant to the topic). - Dank (push to talk) 13:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- For a new navbox just for these family lists: sounds interesting. Maybe after I know how the pieces fit together. - Dank (push to talk) 16:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of lamiid families
- Excellent. - Dank (push to talk) 00:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of Saxifragales families
- Ack, this means I need to get another one ready! - Dank (push to talk) 12:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
February songs
 | |
| my daily stories |
fresh flowers for you! - My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- No thanks. Over the years, I've spent less and less time trying to keep up with wiki-issues that don't affect me. So, "no", and that goes for pretty much all of them. - Dank (push to talk) 00:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I understand, and will try to remember (but memory is a problem for me). Hope you still like flowers. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I do. - Dank (push to talk) 12:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- I understand, and will try to remember (but memory is a problem for me). Hope you still like flowers. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of basal asterid families
- Thanks again. - Dank (push to talk) 00:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of basal eudicot families
- Thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 13:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Help
Dan, I rightfully got the living daylights kicked out of me on the FAC for Tomb of Philippe Pot, which did pass, but after about 1000 edits. You have a lovely and spare writing style, so request is that you help ce my next offering, which is likely to be either the Tandragee Idol or Tara Brooch, and maybe scold and warn where am making grammatical errors (we didn't leant this stuff in 1970s Ireland. If you have time when am ready for your input would be hugely appreciated, but if busy no worries. Ceoil (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm never too busy for you. I'm not a great writer of ... well, anything really ... but I know a thing or two that will help articles pass review, so sure, I'm in. I need to fix a few of my lists first, though. - Dank (push to talk) 18:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- *Delighted*. I'll focus in one one so and give you plenty warning so time commitments arent a prob. You the man. Ceoil (talk) 18:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 1900s (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 1900s (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Shhhnotsoloud: I don't have a position on whether the most recent edit made the page speedy-able, but the version of the page before that was the result of an WP:RM discussion. I just reverted your edit and the edit before that one. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. - Dank (push to talk) 19:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of early-diverging flowering plant families
Broken sfn references
Hi, this edit (and others like it to other articles) broke several references, putting the article into Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. DuncanHill (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Duncan! - Dank (push to talk) 14:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- All done, I think. - Dank (push to talk) 15:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of basal superasterid families
TFL notification
Hi, Dank. I'm just posting to let you know that List of basal eudicot families – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dank, would really, really appreciate if you work your magic on the prose for this article. Have a bit more to add, but would like to refine/repair what there before that and moving it towards a GA nom. There is no pressure here re time or anything, if or when you get a chance. Best as always. Ceoil (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, it may be a few days. - Dank (push to talk) 18:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Love the edits so far; nice than you can couche the elements of uncertainty so clearly. Ceoil (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks much. Wonderful writing ... "enigmatic and haunted expressions", "all-seeing eyes" and so forth really help the reader to get the proper picture. There was one mention of "Hall" that I didn't understand ... otherwise, all good. - Dank (push to talk) 22:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are less sources than you might imagine. Ceoil (talk) 23:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Love the edits so far; nice than you can couche the elements of uncertainty so clearly. Ceoil (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of nitrogen-fixing-clade families
 | |
| my story today |
|---|
Congratulations, Dan! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- :) - Dank (push to talk) 12:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Pentecost was full of music, and my story today is that 300 years ago today, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of List of COM-clade families
- Well, less rare than it used to be :) Thanks for always being there. - Dank (push to talk) 00:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)