User talk:Daniel Couto Vale

Welcome!

Hello, Daniel Couto Vale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Megaman en m (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Latin tenses

Dear Daniel, Nothing prevents you from making your own articles according to the ideas of functional grammar if you wish (it will be interesting to see the results), but please do not alter the article Latin tenses from its present form or break it up into different parts, as you seem to be planning to do. In my view it is perfectly all right as it is. It has been judged by the moderators to be grade B standard, which is good. The changes you are proposing to make would not improve the article. For example, your introduction of categories such as "secondary present" and "secondary past" is an innovation of your own which doesn't come from any standard Latin grammar and so is certain to be reverted. The works you cite (by Halliday etc.) do not deal with Latin grammar, so the application of those ideas to Latin counts as personal research or a personal essay, and so by Wikipedia policy should be published elsewhere, not on Wikipedia. Statements such as "Traditional grammar books refer to the primary meaning of the 'future perfect' and 'pluperfect' without ascribing a proper name to these meanings" are purely your own judgement, I believe. Since terms like "pluperfect" seem acceptable to linguists such as Bernard Comrie in his book Tense, in whose judgement are they not "proper"? At any rate, if you attempt to alter the current Latin tenses article by adding non-standard views, I am sure your alterations will be quickly reverted. Kanjuzi (talk) 12:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I published the page as "Latin tenses (semantics)".

I will link the pages to each other. Daniel Couto Vale (talk) 13:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Latin tenses in commands

The article Latin tenses in commands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of this article is copied directly from the article Latin tenses. Statements such as "Commands have no primary tense" are controversial and unreferenced. Categories such as "present in future", "past in future", "Imperative III" etc. appear to be inventions by the author and not referenced to any grammar book or other source. The article is not needed since most of the material has already been published elsewhere on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Latin genders moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Latin genders. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will be able to add the references when I am back home in 20 days. Daniel Couto Vale (talk) 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Latin genders. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]