User talk:Daniel/Archive/62

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page.

← Archive 61 · Archive 62 · Archive 63 →

A Barnstar For You

		The Original Barnstar
		This is a message. Cremepuff222 12:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Cremepuff222* 12:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HELP!!

Regarding your post:

"Erm...mediation is not third opinion, and no informal mediation has been requested nor agreed to. "Third opinions" don't have "cases" - it's simply you give your opinion about how best to resolve the dispute."

Is this perhaps why I'm confused by this post: ::"If this is your first time doing a 3O, the case will be on the IRC channel (Link). If you wish, the mediation may commence on 03:00"

To the extent that I just made this post: "Unfortunately, I am not able to understand this information because 1) I've never used IRC and don't know how to, and 2} I was under the impression (from very very limited experience) that 3O opinions were given through comments in the normal Wikipedia Talk pages." before I saw your post??? Wanderer57 (talk) 02:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blow of Light unfortunately doesn't understand the idea of third opinions nor understand how to give them. There is no reason for you to follow his "instructions" because he apparently doesn't understand what he's doing, and in the end is only wasting your time. I'd suggest just sitting back and waiting for a third opinion to actually come your way on that talk page. You are correct that third opinions are given on the article talk pages. Daniel (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wanderer57 (talk) 02:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Halo 3; Kensington Gardens; Scott-David Allen; New Humanist; Football Federation Victoria; Battle of Coleto; RAC plc; Minsaara Kanavu; Sarah Illingworth; Anthony Stuart; List of people pardoned by Bill Clinton; Islamic studies; Malaspina University-College; Football Federation of South Australia; Amélie; Resource Description Framework; Dean Heffernan; Science journalism; Christopher Masterson

Cleanup: Michelle Ryan; Antitheism; Automobile self starter
Merge: Frank Ashley Day Middle School; A-League 2005-06; Cronulla Sharks All Time Playerlist
Add Sources: Panay incident; Unit 100; List of the most popular names in the 1890s in the United States
Wikify: Melbourne Knights; Mark Gonzales; Davies
Expand: Classical music; Zinedine Zidane; Richard Lindzen

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please trim your statement on requests for arbitration

Thank you for making a statement in an Arbitration application on requests for arbitration. We ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Please trim your statement accordingly. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence. Neat, concisely presented statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the Arbitrators.

For the Arbitration Committee. Daniel (talk) 10:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I talk too little people don't understand, when I talk too much people don't pay attention. I seem to not comprehend the balance. I was wondering if you could trim it for me only leaving back what you feel is the most relevant. Is this possible? Thanks. -- Cat ^chi? 13:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Done: I II. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BC RFAR "voting"

Sorry, I think I was a bit rough. Forgive the tone in the edit summary.

See WP:AC/C/N#Move to voting for comment :) FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 22:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 11	13 March 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage	Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule"
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration	WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling
Tutorial: Summary of policies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 12	17 March 2008	About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles"	News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at peer review
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones	Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Loverly spam

Hi there Daniel/Archive! As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation has recently approved Wikimedia Australia as an official chapter. In order to acknowledge this, and to appoint an interim committee, approve our statement of purpose and our rules, and appoint a Public Officer, Wikimedia Australia will be having a meeting at Computerbank in Melbourne. For those of us who are located in other cities, we shall be holding conference calls to the main meeting.

The meeting will be held at 2:30PM on Sunday, 20th April 2008, Adelaide time. In order for us to organise this meeting, we need your help! Please drop by at our meta subpage with suggestions as to venues, conference calling services, etc. It will be at 2:30 so we can meet up for lunch beforehand if anyone's open for that!

Hoping to see you there! ~ Riana ⁂ 01:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are an active Wikimedian in Adelaide and are on this list. If you think I've missed anyone out, please feel free to copy-paste this and send it to them too!

Spam. Daniel (talk) 01:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is awesome.

[23:26] <MopperGuitar> Batman_: Daniel-Bryant is the devil, do not comply
[23:27] <batman_> oh?
[23:27] * Daniel-Bryant has quit IRC ("mibbit.com: Devils are prohibited from idling in #wikipedia-en")

P.S. you rock. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 04:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a chanop, I feel it is my duty to enforce channel rules regarding creatures which reside below the ground. As to your postscript; well, {{dubious}} summarises it well. Daniel (talk) 03:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

editing closed arbcom case evidence pages

Hi. Is is appropriate for White Cat to be editing closed case evidence has he has at;

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Evidence/by White Cat history;

and the new further subpage;

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Evidence/by White Cat/graph?

Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've started up a discussion amongst clerks and arbitrators about what to do. I'll get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. He's transcluding that thing all over the place; [1]. He has also massively refactored some old checkuser pages and redirected stuff to the new one. As I see it, this is way out of line; akin to evidence tampering. I believe he is trying to regrade the landscape to pitch towards his allegations. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

From the other day, I've replied. Rudget . 12:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ta, replied back. Daniel (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J Szatkowski‎

This article appears to be a repost of Jan Szatkowski, and its creator has no other edits. TML (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. David deleted it and I blocked the sockpuppet. Thanks again, Daniel (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You eat kittens?

Damn, if my RFA weren't withdrawn, I'd block you... eee... when I was your wikiage we made fifteen edits to vote on an RFA and fifteen edits to go back to proper editing. And we had no standardised templates! *walks off rambling about the price of vandalism* Sceptre ^(talk) 12:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Puppies as well, apparently. Daniel (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kids these days, don't know what's good for them! I demand you recall yourself! Sceptre ^(talk) 12:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would endorse this recall. :D dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 04:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my RFA

Thank you!

Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta ^Sing 17:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Testing

1..2..3 -- Flyguy649 ^talk 00:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4..5..6 -- Mønobi 03:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy easter!

Open your card >> >> >>

Happy easter you guys! Sorry if the picture looked crappy, but it's the best I could do on such short notice. Sincerely, BoL (Talk) 04:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Credits: This card was inspired by BoL, an administrator/bureaucrat and head designer of Codesnippets. Join the community today![reply]

For the record; Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Removing_topic_ban_on_Blow_of_Light_-_Finalise.3F. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 04:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS review requested

Could you review the OTRS ticket referenced at drv and comment on the validity of the otrs action? Regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note to arbitrators

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Note to arbitrators

Hi, Iwas wondering if you could forward the RFCU findings to arbitrators. I do not know if you can access the arbcom mailing list. -- Cat ^chi? 19:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

They will see it on the RfAr page. I do not have read access to arbcom-l, although I'm not sure whether my moderation restrictions are any different to everyone else. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Betacommand 2 case

I understand you're clerking the case. User:MickMacNee has been blocked for 72 hours (WP:AN/I#Opinion on an Afd re disruption, User talk:MickMacNee#Blocked) and an unblock request has been denied. You might want to inform him of how he could continue giving his opinion on the case if his block stays. I'd tell him but it would seem spiteful as I am in lively debate with him already on the case, so I was hoping you could help. x42bn6 Talk Mess 20:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've told him he can email me if he needs to post something. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Cellbg

A tag has been placed on Template:Cellbg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ta. Daniel (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deja vu all over again

This nonsense just never seems to end, does it? TML (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. Deleted, protected, blocked. Daniel (talk) 02:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help, one question though, how the hell did you find that discussion thred? Is it hard to do that?WilliamMThompson (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which discussion thread? Daniel (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, how did you become involved with what the other bloke and I were talking about, that is, the sign post and the community bulletin board talk?WilliamMThompson (talk) 05:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because I read his talk page? Daniel (talk) 05:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay, do you know how I check a counter for my contributions? So I can see how many contribs I have done?WilliamMThompson (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:EDITCOUNT. Daniel (talk) 06:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Click?

Using Click...? You shameful bastard :p Lucky Ryu fixed it or you'd be stuck with those jumbo images forever... You owed to be desysopped for dishonouring ~~the cabal~~the admins... btw, I'll try doing some shit on the hailstormcruft today :) —Dark ^talk 06:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully?

I see you were the concluding admin for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Le-Huy, and you closed it as "weakly kept".

Could you please explain what you meant by "weakly kept"? Is weakly kept a conclusion authorized by policy? I am trying to figure out what this concluding comment means.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was just on the keep side of no consensus. Daniel (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 13	24 March 2008	About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators	Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers"
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter	WikiProject Report: Video games
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Account "Daniel" is now free on als.wp

Hello Daniel,
the account name "Daniel" now is available again on als.wp (>SUL)! --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 17:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! Cheers, Daniel (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question (ja.books)

Hello, I'm b:ja:User:Electric goat, b'crat on ja.books. Let me confirm one thing. Did you request an SUL account usurpation at b:ja:利用者‐会話:Electric_goat#Hi? Thanks, e-Goat (talk) 12:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did. Sorry for not confirming earlier. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 13:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, now b:ja:User:Daniel is available. Cheers, e-Goat (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for all your help! Daniel (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CWY2190

Hi Daniel, thanks for your note about the above RfA. I wasn't having trouble with the decision, I was just trying to close it as soon as I could since it was three hours overdue! And pressing F5 on my Mac wouldn't help.... ;-) But thanks for the pointer to {{rfah}}, wasn't aware of that. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were promoted near-unanimously, so I'd hope you weren't having trouble deciding *evil laugh* :) Speaking of Macs, Vista sucks, unlike rfah, which is very handy :) Cheers, Daniel (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:RosedaleCanda.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RosedaleCanda.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Betacommand 2

Yes, definitely voting now. :) Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) Daniel (talk) 04:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost report

I've drawn up the basis for the WikiProject report here. If you can inform other members and then get back to me with the feedback (of who will be answering the questions etc.) that'd be great. Regards, Rudget . 17:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]