User talk:DangTongFaYi

October 2024

Hello, DangTongFaYi, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 05:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have proof that I am using multiple accounts? DangTongFaYi (talk) 05:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You performed the same edit as IPs from Las Vegas, Nevada. Those IPs were blocked for disruption in 2023: 174.195.96.202 and 2600:1011:B07F:44B3:0:0:0:0/64. Recently, three IPs from Texas made the same edit multiple times followed by one from a proxy in Australia, and now you have performed the edit as your first-ever action under this user name. Remsense is correct to harbor suspicion. You are an active participant in an ongoing edit war. Binksternet (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I performed the same edit as someone else. My action’s right or wrong depends on the action itself, not on if someone else have done it before. Those IPs were blocked for disruption in 2023. Were they blocked because of that specific edit, the same edit you said done by me? If not, you are like saying I am guilty because I eat food and some convicted criminals also eat food. This was my first ever edit but this is not a brand-new account. I only had vague idea of if Wikipedia can be edited by anyone on the internet. And you two made my first experience extremely nauseating. I asked for proof and you had zero. You were accusing me of something based on entirely suspicions. If an edit is valid or not should base on the edit itself, if the contents are fact based, if the source is legitimate, and so on. Have you looked at my edit and search for the actual book I mentioned before you undo it? Not at all. And that is irresponsibility. DangTongFaYi (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazi racial theories. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You (Binksternet) currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you (Binksternet) have made on Nazi racial theories. This means that you (Binksternet) are repeatedly changing content back to how you (Binksternet) think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you (Binksternet) have made;

Do not edit war even if you (Binksternet) believe you are right.

If you find yourself (Binksternet) in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You (Binksternet) can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you (Binksternet) engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

It also all fits if it were talking about YOUSELF (Binksternet). I am? NO. You are engaged in an edit war. DangTongFaYi (talk) 22:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ji Xianlin in Nazi Germany

I believe you understand Chinese, so I give you the Chinese text of Ji Xianlin's Ten Years in Germany.

希特勒的内政外交，我们可以存而不论；但是他那一套诬蔑中国人的理论，我们却不应该置之不理。他说，世界上只有他们所谓的“北方人”是文明的创造者，而中国人等则是文明的破坏者。这种胡说八道的谬论，引起了中国留学生的极大的愤怒。但是，我们是寄人篱下，只是敢怒而不敢言了。

Translate: We can ignore Hitler's domestic and foreign policies, but we should not ignore his theories that slander the Chinese. He said that only the so-called "Northerners" in the world are the creators of civilization, while the Chinese are the destroyers of civilization. This nonsense aroused great anger among Chinese students. However, we are living under someone else's roof, so we dare not speak out.

http://archive.keyllo.com/W-%E6%95%A3%E6%96%87/%E5%AD%A3%E7%BE%A1%E6%9E%97%E6%95%A3%E6%96%87%E9%9B%86.pdf

If you can't open the website, you can also search the Chinese paragraph on Google. Ho Pak-chuen (talk) 09:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazi racial theories. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you have the authority to block my account? Do you hold concrete proof that this is a duplicate account? Or just suspicion? If you indeed are some kind of administrator, I can send you my identity papers and so on and show that this is my only account. DangTongFaYi (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The TOXCICIDITY of moderators to new editors!!! “Wikipedia is living proof that anarchy doesn't work in large scale. It is now completely captured by mobs of sentinels working, paid or voluntarily, for interest groups, shutting down, deleting and blocking every user that counters their narrative. It was badly set up from the start, naively believing in the power of consensus. This turned out to be the tyranny of whomever has time and resources to shut other people up. It just fulfilled by toxic moderators who always remove content that they think it’s wrong no matter actually they don’t understand the topic.” DangTongFaYi (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangTongFaYi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do you even know what you are talking about? Nobody looks at my open unblock request or my talk page. And there is no other way for me to communicate since I cannot edit others’ talk page. What am I supposed to do? If you are an administrator, then behave like one. :

Decline reason:

If you pull this one more time, you will lose access to your talk page. Yamla (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangTongFaYi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, can someone unblock my account? The block reason is sockpuppet. But this is my only account.

Decline reason:

It is abusive to have multiple simultaneous open unblock requests. Don't do that again. Yamla (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangTongFaYi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But why do I need to send you anything at all. Presumption of innocence. You cannot prove that this is a sockpuppet then why you get to block it? Since when Wikipedia is a place for misinformation? People do not look at my edits at all. Just throwing unfounded accusations like sockpuppet or edit war. What is truth? It seems to me that at Wikipedia, truth is what the administrators says, truth is what some experienced editors says. You do not read the contents, do not look up the book being quoted and check if it's valid. Hours of hard work deleted by a simple click and 5-word comment, nothing but hearted and arrogance. Some tells me to write the talk page before editing. I did, and nobody ever checks the talk page. Experienced editors change the content, and it’s good to go. I make one small change that’s after careful research and with valid source, it gets undone. On top of that, I get accused of sockpuppet. You are bullies here on the internet, not allowing others to talk. Always think only yourself are correct. And in fact you don’t even know what’s going on here. THE CONTENT! THE CONTENT! THE CONTENT! Look at what I wrote in my edits and think for yourself it they make sense.

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. Yamla (talk) 23:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangTongFaYi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block reason is sockpuppet. But this is my only account. What more can I say?

Decline reason:

Well, you've already admitted that you're going to engage in sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DangTongFaYi (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could probably start by walking back comments about the "TOXCICIDITY of moderators", since that doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that you're going to be able to return to editing without trying to start fights with everyone. You need to be able to interact with people, even people you disagree with, without shouting at them. -- asilvering (talk) 04:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I was too upset. I am and will always be peaceful and respectful when interactig with others. DangTongFaYi (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.