User talk:Ho Pak-chuen
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Ho Pak-chuen! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! --Donald Trung (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
re. nat'l anthem of ROC
[edit]Hi, I RV'd one of your edits on National Anthem of the Republic of China regarding the meaning of 黨. However, I'm no extreme expert on Classical Chinese so I didn't want to revert it without checking for info. What did you take it to mean that caused you to change the translation? I'm only really familiar with party offhand and looking through my dictionary I found only e.g. "society" that might have fit. Feel free to revert what I've done if you feel it was in error. However, I'd like to see whatever usage of 黨 it was, for possible future use and of course just verification. Thanks. Duonaut (talk | contribs) 02:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- In fact, this is still controversial in Taiwan today. Because "黨" can refer not only to political parties, but also to friends and peers. The pan-Green coalition tend to the former and therefore often refuse to sing the first two sentences, while pan-blue camps tend to the latter.
- For the definition of this character, you can check 重編國語辭典修訂本, which is an authoritative dictionary published by the Ministry of Education (Taiwan).
- https://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=2065&q=1&word=%E9%BB%A8 Ho Pak-chuen (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks for the insight, that's an interesting debate. Classical Chinese's vagueness has interesting consequences, lol Duonaut (talk | contribs) 19:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of university and college mottos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm AirshipJungleman29. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Siege of Baghdad (1258), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Racial policy of Nazi Germany shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa (talk) 17:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)