User talk:Dana c 83

Welcome!

Hi Dana c 83! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Borody

Do have have any kind of connection to Thomas Borody? Please be aware of WP:COI and particularly WP:COIDISCLOSE. Alexbrn (talk) 05:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to confirm that I do not have a COI with Tom Borody. I worked alongside him over 9 years ago but we no longer are affiliated. However, I take offense at the obvious bias against the ivermectin debate currently represented on his page when all I had done was explain the scientific rationale for its use, based on randomized controlled trials, which were referenced. It would be worthwhile to remember that Barry Marshall was once treated this way about H. Pylori and look where we are today. Dana c 83 (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the Galileo Gambit. An ex-colleague does probably rates as a COI, and it seems your entire history with Wikipedia is to puff-up Borody. Please stop doing that. Any content must be reliably-sourced and biomedical claims need WP:MEDRS. Alexbrn (talk) 11:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And did the Galileo gambit also apply to the ridicule regarding FMT, which is now recommended in treatment guidelines for relapsed/refractory CDI? I don’t believe an ex-colleague of over 9 years ago does represent a COI but it seems that you are clutching at straws. I disagree that my role is to “puff up” Doctor Borody, I have simply outlined his work, which I was under the assumption this page was about. I would be interested to know what content in my recent edits was not reliably sourced, and instead of simply being removed, I would like an opportunity to replace them. Dana c 83 (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to check on your COI, ask at WP:COIN. Please make any suggestions for article improvement at Talk:Thomas Borody. Note that the article still contains some unsourced content (see the template in the body text). Note that in this[1] edit for example you were adding medical claims to the article sourced to primary research, which is not reliable for such content per WP:MEDRS.

Also note that adding unsourced editorial spin like "Numerous government agencies, health advisory panels and research bodies, with no experience in the use of this new combination triple therapy have misquoted and misinformed the public by referring to trials of ivermectin alone ... " will likely get you removed from Wikipedia for WP:SOAPBOXING. Alexbrn (talk) 12:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I notice now a IP user using TPG Internet and based in Sydney[2] is blanking parts of the article.[3] Is that you editing logged-out? Alexbrn (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 12:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest on Wikipedia

A few relevant links were already provided above, but here is the standard template below.

Hello, Dana c 83. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 18:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]