User talk:DanElsd

Welcome

Hello DanElsd and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kévin Bru. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kévin Bru was changed by DanElsd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927707 on 2018-01-07T00:53:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kévin Bru, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am just a very big fan of big lad Kevin bru DanElsd (talk) 01:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lanner, Cornwall.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lanner, Cornwall was changed by DanElsd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869471 on 2018-01-07T01:31:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I know I vandalized Kevin brus wiki but I love in lancer, Cornwall and I think these changes were necessary. Please don't ban me I won't mess up again. Thank dan xx DanElsd (talk) 01:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kévin Bru has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen.i am bad at life. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kévin Bru was changed by DanElsd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911726 on 2018-10-07T18:24:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Perran Mehen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Perran Mehen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 18:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Perran Mehen, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 18:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Perran Mehen. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 18:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:52, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello matey, please unban me ip. i promise ill behave

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DanElsd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i made a massive mistake and it will never happen again, please unban me ip please DanElsd (talk) 21:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

can i please be unbanned now, its been a month and ive learnt my lesson, plus im very bored, i have recently been knighted by the big queen herself. Thanks Dan xxx

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DanElsd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it has been a month and i have thought long and hard about ive done. im very sorry and ive learnt my lesson. i promise that what i did will never happen again DanElsd (talk) 22:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DanElsd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok ill try again. if you could unblock my account that would be great. firstly because i wrongly edited loads of pages and i regret it highly. secondly if im unbanned i will make lots of good edits that are good and helpful. Thanks DanDanElsd (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See previous declines. If you file another unblock request that does not address the reason for your block or provide an explanation of what you intend to edit going forward, you are liable to lose the ability to edit this page. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What are you going to do differently if you are unblocked. Be specific. Or provide specific examples of good edits you would make. —C.Fred (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]