User talk:Damauli

A tag has been placed on Deshanter interview, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Deshanter interview. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

HalfShadow (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Deshanter interview. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deshanter interview

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deshanter interview, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Deshanter interview. Metropolitan90 (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Deshanter interview, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nepalipatra.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=373&Itemid=1&date=2008-01-01. As a copyright violation, Deshanter interview appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Deshanter interview has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Deshanter interview and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Deshanter interview with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Deshanter interview.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Andreas ^(T) 17:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anita yadav

The article Anita yadav has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bazj (talk) 10:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided, as you did with Anita yadav. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Anita yadav, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Other wikipedia pages don't count as sources. Bazj (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did at Anita yadav. Bazj (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anita Yadav for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anita Yadav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Yadav until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 15:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Damauli. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anita Yadav, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anita Yadav

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anita Yadav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~HackedBotato ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs} 04:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When an article is deleted in an Articles for Deletion discussion, you can't simply recreate it. You can go to Deletion Review to ask to have the deletion overturned, and you can ask the deleting administrator what your other options may be. But you need to present new evidence that the person is notable, not simply repeat what was already said in the old discussion. Please also stop promoting Anita Yadav in other Wikipedia articles. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 07:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. Anita Yadav Does not promotion on wiki. She is notable person in Nepal and doing so many good work for the society. wikipedia is becoming mainstream media run by big corporation. May be wiki is for develop country not for developing. Good luck . damauli 011:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damauli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish i know the real reason. I guess the only reason i am blocked is because i am from third world poor country. I am just trying let world knows that we have few notable people in your country. All i did was to create the page for social worker whom i thought deserve to have page. We live in a society where there are more exception than rules. May be i am the exception. If writing about some one who i think deserve to be written is wrong then i like to be wrong and blocked from wiki. I am sorry if doing so cause problems to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. —Cryptic 21:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for the clarification. I really appreciate it. I am a social media consultant. I have no personal interest to President family of Nepal. Ms Anita yadav happened to be the daughter of President but she has her own identity. I know very well wikipedia is not the place for promotion. People do promotion on google plus, facebook and other social media sites.damauli 18:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I am not an administrator, but I would say that the only reason you are blocked is that you don't follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. There are hundreds of articles on English Wikipedia about Nepalese people who are notable, and many, many editors who live in "poor" countries (for want of a better term) and who edit without any problem. However, none of us, regardless of who we are or where we live, is allowed to create a page about a person we think deserve one, unless the person is notable according to Wikipedia's definition of notability. And when such an article is deleted after a deletion discussion where the consensus is that the person is not notable, I'm afraid that the article can't be recreated unless new information is presented, and even then you can't simply recreate it, you have to discuss it with the deleting administrator first.

In addition, since you are apparently closely affiliated with Anita Yadav (judging by the fact that you have uploaded many pictures of her which you claim as your own work), you have a conflict of interest - which is something you have been warned about before. Since all your edits have been to either create articles about her, or to add her name and pictures of her to other articles, it is difficult not to see a promotional agenda here. --bonadea contributions talk 12:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]