User talk:Daivathar

Nomination of Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drm310 (talk) 21:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daivathar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Daivathar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Daivathar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 16:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 (talk) 14:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot use Wikipedia itself as a reference for an article's content. Please see WP:CIRCULAR. --Drm310 (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Drm310 (talk) 16:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple. ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 17:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuttiattoor Thittayil Sree Daivathar Temple (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drm310 (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Blocked

I have indefinitely blocked this account for Disruption. Dreadstar ☥ 05:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]