User talk:Daikido/Archives/2023/September

Unexplained comment removal

User:Daikido, without giving any explanation, you removed several of my comments on Wikipedia:In The News/Candidates, including a support vote, further hiding the move as a minor edit. Was this an accident while reversing something else, or is there any reason for this unexpected move? Chaotic Enby (talk) 10:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

I genuinely dont know how this happened but this was a 100% accident. I'm using several of the Wikipedia's beta features for its editing side of things maybe one of those caused this? This is a second random bug i've encountered this week here, previously the citation making software somehow replaced the reference i was trying to put it to a news article with a reference to a biology paper from 1975. Either way, Mea culpa, im sorry this happened.

P.S. This wasn't a minor edit to hide things. I was removing news sources unrelated to the armenian story that accidentally made into the nomination. @Chaotic Enby Daikido (talk) 11:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Oh okay, my bad then. Do any of the beta features interact with edit conflicts? That might be it then. Chaotic Enby (talk) 12:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

I genuinely don't know. Maybe this seeing how this is seemingly the only one that directly interferes with edit conflicts, but who knows. Either way I didn't get any usual warnings regarding edit conflicts when I was submitting my edit that removed your comments. I just have a feeling/suspicion, now more than yesterday, that these beta features/gadgets are actually surprisingly buggy Daikido (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Genuinely sorry for the whole misunderstanding. You should definitely file a bug report, it could possibly be this. Chaotic Enby (talk) 13:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

It's no problem. No offence done. I'll see tomorrow if i can figure this one out and make a bug report Daikido (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Do you have this part of the plugin enabled? It could be it. Chaotic Enby (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes

On 20 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 09:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Daikido, regarding this AfD

Hi Daikido, I have taken the liberty to remove your edit on the above AfD as you wrote unfounded conjectures on this BLP, which is prohibited by policy. May I request you to kindly be careful when commenting on biographies of living persons? Thank you for your consideration in advance. Best, Lourdes 15:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Oh I'm so sorry I was just so outraged because I've stumbled upon him in some twitter where some **expletive**s were denigrating and insulting a ukrainian-canadian veteran who fought against the orcs, and that guy participated in that witch hunt..... My apologies, I'll get rid of my stress and re-write my vote, that article should clearly be removed from wikipedia, we shouldn't be hosting actual kremlin prop aganda Daikido (talk) 06:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Clarify a comment

Hi. Can you please clarify what you meant here, specifically the sentence I feel like this is another sign of the worrisome trend of indians getting access to the itnernet and then starting to ovrwhelm wikipedia with their nationalism? Curbon7 (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

idk what to tell you, go look around articles that are important to indian nationalists. over the past 5+ years there's been a significant influx of editors clearly from india (or her diaspora) pushing them into very POV directions Daikido (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Nemoralis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nemoralis (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing. You need to stop using WP:ITN as free-for-all, chat-like forum. Comments such as I feel like this is another sign of the worrisome trend of indians getting access to the itnernet and then starting to ovrwhelm wikipedia with their nationalism are unacceptable (diff). Further such conduct is likely to lead to more severe sanctions. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 08:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

kek, the indian cabal isnt happy eh. it's just as well, the more blatant your bias is the more obvious and less efficient it becomes Daikido (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Do you deny that your consistent use of lowercase indian and india is designed to diminish that country and its people — the way white supremacists use lower case jew for Jews? Do you deny doing the same with the word kek here? El_C 08:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Nice, even blocked me from replying on that admin noticeboard page where you've pinged me. Keep ruining this website's reputation further, it's already in the gutter. Daikido (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

And with that non-answer, you're now blocked from this talk page, too. I've also set your block not to expire. See WP:UTRS for your appeal options. El_C 10:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)