User talk:Dadarson

Welcome!

Hello, Dadarson! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...) 15:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Want to know the most evil and bullying cyber company in the world, its not the one you are thinking. Its the one that is not publicly traded, has no advertisers, gives zero dollars in taxes and has absolutely no accountability: Its WIKIPEDIA. And if you are a masochist looking to be bullied day in and day out, look no further than Wikipedia as the apex of cyber bullying colony. It is the shadiest organization with arbitrary rules and policies; unpaid, and almost certainly unemployed, editors acting as the most monolithic administrators since the police of Chinatown. They all have their agendas, point of views, and have an unabridged hatred for everything civilized.

Want to start a page, want to inform the public? Want to do some good in the world by disseminating some useful information, or want to fight for justice or free speech. Then you have come to the hell of 'free speech', if you were unlucky enough to wander into Wikipedia. It will take away your innocence, it will take away your information, call it spam, flounder your sources, references and citations. If you cry foul, expect a long unending lesson in legal jargon with phrases such as "chilling effect" thrown your way. You will be blocked, but your account can never be deleted. In fact if you want to take away what you had written or revert your edit, even that won't be allowed under the arbitrary laws of its criminally gifted administrators. The company can't help you, because these criminally gifted administrators of Wikipedia are not on the company payroll; in fact they are more like an informal community of organized criminals getting zero dollars for their cyber racketeering activity.

Expect your personal data to be stolen and sold in the black market. Almost all these administrators have personal connections with hackers, and will threaten you to your face; all the while remaining safely hidden and anonymous by the protections granted to them by Wikipedia, by virtue of them being expert at bullying actual experts. Innocent schoolteachers, academicians, even doctors, who would foolishly try to edit anything of importance in their area of expertise, can expect the worst experience of their life for changing as much as a comma.

So, the next time you wander into the dark corners of the internet, also known as Wikipedia, remember that you have wandered into Hell, and there is no going back to the civilized world. Run fast and run far, don't look behind, and never come back again to the page titled Wikipedia.

I want to be deleted you low AI bots.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadarson (talk • contribs)

You seem to dislike us greatly. Let me help you off the site. Blocked. Also we don't delete accounts. Legally, we can't. --Golbez (talk) 16:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadarson (talk • contribs)

Can't. You continuing to beg for it will not make it happen. Have a nice day! --Golbez (talk) 16:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

who the fuck is begging you negative net worth, xxy— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadarson (talk • contribs)

You are adorable. Talk page usage blocked. --Golbez (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Potential sockpuppet?

@Golbez and The Quixotic Potato: I see that the AN/I is closed, but I wondered if this is a sockpuppet, based upon the nature of the changes and the extent of the anger. Who starts off being that angry?–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@CaroleHenson: Feel free to re-open the AN/I if you want to. It may be a fan of Jytdog's work. It may be someone who forgot to take his happy pills. If it is a sock then Jytdog may know who the master is. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 16:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Ahhhh, good hint. I think I found an earlier user account that may be a sockpuppet. It was blocked for four days on July 12. There wasn't uncivil language, but there was edit warring and a similar verbose nature. Since this account is blocked, I'll drop it for now - but will watch future contributions. If he/she opens another account, it is likely that they will make their presence known via edit warring, uncivil behavior, improper content or improperly cited content, etc.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@CaroleHenson:--For some reasons I feel, that this talk-page was/is not the appropriate place for these comments/any discussion on this regard!Winged Blades ^Godric 17:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)