User talk:Dabigkid

Welcome!

Hello, Dabigkid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

And don't forget, the edit summary is your friend. :) – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I've been a member for awhile :) --Dabigkid 03:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to RuneScape

Your recent edit to RuneScape was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 00:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found it to be a good contribution. -Dabigkid 00:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatch'a add? [[[User:69.209.215.131|69.209.215.131]] 01:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)11 yrold who doesnt know how to edit wiki.]

Vandalism ;D --Dabigkid 01:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Re [1]: please see WP:MOS#National_varieties_of_English. Mikker ^(...) 11:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. --Dabigkid 14:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Eota icon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Eota icon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to “Quantity theory of money”

Re, your edit to “Quantity theory of money”: The article did not assert that $P$ and $M$ were equal. The inflation rate is not $P$ nor even $dP/dt$ , and an equality of growth rates does not imply an equality of the things growing. Your claim

the inflation rate would change proportionally with the money supply

is simply wrong, confusing the price level with the inflation rate.

Arguably, the original reference to “the growth rate of the money supply” might be taken to refer to

{\frac {dM}{dt}}

rather than to

{\frac {dM/M}{dt}}

even though it is the latter than appears in the equation and the growth rate is nearly or always reported as a percentage, so I've toss-in the adjective “proportionate” to the otherwise restored wording. If I think of a better adjective later, then I'll replace “proportionate”. —SlamDiego_←T 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]