User talk:D Monack
Alt Text
[edit]Hey. Thanks for fixing my Alt Text on Template:Washington DC landmarks. My only question is that i do not think that what you changed it to fulfills WP:ALT, it doesn't explain what the picture looks like. I am only doing this because i am trying to get List of Smithsonian Museums to FL status, and in the review i got they told me i need Alt texts. You appear to have more experience at this so i am just wondering why you changed the alt text so drastically.--Found5dollar (talk) 14:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- The idea behind the alt text is to describe the image for the benefit of anyone who can't see the image. Just reading your alt text, someone wouldn't get the most important thing: that this is an image of the Washington Monument. I.e., you write "A white obelisk..." It's not just any white obelisk; it's the most iconic obelisk of them all.
- When writing alt text ask yourself how you'd describe the image to a friend over the telephone. In this case, "The Washington Monument" conjures up the image readily. You could elaborate on my alt text by writing about the flags, the angle of the photo, the color of the sky, etc. but these things are all incidental. This image is relevant to this template because it's of a particular monument, not just any "white obelisk" which is a bit of an understatement. —D. Monack talk 07:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ah. Ok. Thanks. I understand it now. If the picture appeared as the first image in an article about the Whashington Monument then you would describe it as a white obelisk. got ya. Thanks!--Found5dollar (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello D Monack! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 327 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Roberto García Parrondo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- James Hampton (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Richard Palmer-James - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Philip Roth
[edit]Hi,
I think I just interfered with your edit. Feel free to delete any quotation marks you don't like, I was just after the deletion of two words without which the sentence didn't make much sense.
Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- I wasn't the one who took those words out. Those were from the previous edit. —D. Monack talk 23:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Poet
[edit]Hi D Monack, I undo the redirect to poetry, because the article poet is encyclopedic, a profession how advocate, architect, engineer, nurse, physician, physicist, professor, scientist and many other. As we have the article poet, makes no sense a redirect to poetry. Before doing the redirect of this article, we would have to discuss the issue of all other articles of professions. Another issue to not do the redirect, are the interwikis; there are many interwikis for this article. Thanks. OffsBlink (talk) 22:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Planning Discussions Now Underway Regarding DC Meetup #10
[edit]- You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
- Please be advised that planning is now underway (see here) for DC Meetup #10. --NBahn (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia Campus Ambassador?
[edit]Hi there, I'm LiAnna Davis, the communications associate for the Wikimedia Foundation's new Public Policy Initiative. We are currently looking for dedicated Wikipedians near the George Washington University and Georgetown University areas to serve as Campus Ambassadors, and I hope you might be interested.
Volunteer Campus Ambassadors will provide face-to-face training and support for professors and students on Wikipedia-related skills, such as how to create new articles, how to add images, how the talk pages work, etc. If you're especially enthusiastic and know people on campus, you can set up Wikipedia-related student groups and organize "Welcome to Wikipedia" social events.
More details about the Wikipedia Campus Ambassador role can be found at http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Campus_Ambassador.
The estimated time commitment for this role is 3-5 hours a week, possibly slightly more at the very beginning and very end of the semester. The Wikimedia Foundation will hold a mandatory three-day training for all Campus Ambassadors in August, and will continue to stay in contact with and offer full support for the Campus Ambassadors throughout the academic semester.
Please let us know if this is something that sounds interesting to you or if you know of any other Wikipedians near George Washington or Georgetown who could help out. Feel free to respond on Annie Lin's talk page or email her at alin@wikimedia.org (Annie is our Campus Team Coordinator).--Ldavis (Public Policy) (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just in case you missed it, there is an oppurtunity to get a free dinner this Tuesday August 11 and a chance to meet and hang out talk about Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy and WP:GLAM/SI. Sorry that this is so late in the game, I was hoping the e-mail would be a better form of contact for active members (if you want to get on the e-mail list send me an User e-mail ). Hope that you can attend, User:Sadads (talk)11:41, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
An off-wiki discussion is taking place concerning DC Meetup #12. Watch this page for announcements.
—NBahn (talk) 04:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
P.S. You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
File:MeridianHillPark.jpg needs authorship information.
[edit]
The media file you uploaded as File:MeridianHillPark.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.
Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.
If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.
If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)File:CCC-C&O.jpg needs authorship information.
[edit]
The media file you uploaded as File:CCC-C&O.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.
Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.
If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.
If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Smithsonian Archives of American Art Backstage Pass
[edit]| Archives of American Art Backstage Pass! - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art in, Washington, D.C., on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26!
[edit]| Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
|---|---|
 |
FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-Thon and Meetup!
[edit]| Who should come? You should. Really. | |
|---|---|
 |
|
...and if you do not live in the Washington, D.C. area, please forgive the intrusion and you can delete this invite! Sarah (talk) 04:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Webinar / edit-a-thon at the National Library of Medicine (NLM)
[edit]Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!
On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.
Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.
If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho (talk) 05:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Have time on Saturday?
[edit]I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.
I hope to see you there!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Harej (talk) 04:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, June 15!
[edit]Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!
For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 19:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Join us this Sunday for the Great American Wiknic!
[edit]
|
Great American Wiknic DC at Meridian Hill Park | 
|
| You are invited to the Great American Wiknic DC at the James Buchanan Memorial at Meridian Hill Park. We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck! :) |
Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC. To unsubscribe from future DC area event notifications, remove your name from this list.
Harej (talk) 15:39, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, July 13!
[edit]Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, July 13 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!
For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 00:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:DyingAnimal.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:DyingAnimal.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- I originally uploaded this file as a fair-use, copyrighted image. Another user incorrectly tagged it as public domain. The license has been reverted. D Monack (talk) 21:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- How is it copyrighted? postdlf (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Book covers are creative works that automatically fall under copyright unless the copyright term has elapsed or the copyright holder explicitly releases it into the public domain. D Monack (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Where did you get that idea? Because it's not correct. No type of work or object automatically gets copyright protection without regard to the form it actually takes; all works must actually contain copyrightable expression. Excluding the painting, which is in the public domain because of age, what about the remainder of this cover do you believe is copyrightable rather than just {{PD-text}}? postdlf (talk) 21:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- I did oversimplify what the law says. My layman's understanding is that what qualifies as an original work for copyright purposes is not always cut and dry. When uploading book covers, I work under the assumption that they fall under copyright and tag them with a fair use license especially when it's unlikely the image would ever be used on a page other than that for the book. The finer points of copyright law don't interest me, so feel free to change the license tag on the page. I won't fight you on that. You may want to take up the issue with User:Sfan00 IMG who first accused my of using the wrong license. D Monack (talk) 21:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- I appreciate you saying that now, but assuming such a thing is not a good practice when another editor has given a cogent explanation to the contrary, as I did in my edit summary when I changed it to a PD tag. Plus it's a waste of resources to maintain something here under the assumption that it's non-free when it's not, as we waste time fussing over size reductions, NFUR details, etc., for something that we didn't have to. So please do try to identify future uploads properly. You'll see not even Sfan00 IMG assumes book covers are public domain, as he has tagged for moving to Commons many of the book cover images I have tagged as PD.[1] I've already started a discussion with him on his talk page about this one, as I still have no idea what his claim about it is, particularly given that there never was a claim it was "licensed" so "permission" is irrelevant. postdlf (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- I did oversimplify what the law says. My layman's understanding is that what qualifies as an original work for copyright purposes is not always cut and dry. When uploading book covers, I work under the assumption that they fall under copyright and tag them with a fair use license especially when it's unlikely the image would ever be used on a page other than that for the book. The finer points of copyright law don't interest me, so feel free to change the license tag on the page. I won't fight you on that. You may want to take up the issue with User:Sfan00 IMG who first accused my of using the wrong license. D Monack (talk) 21:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Where did you get that idea? Because it's not correct. No type of work or object automatically gets copyright protection without regard to the form it actually takes; all works must actually contain copyrightable expression. Excluding the painting, which is in the public domain because of age, what about the remainder of this cover do you believe is copyrightable rather than just {{PD-text}}? postdlf (talk) 21:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Book covers are creative works that automatically fall under copyright unless the copyright term has elapsed or the copyright holder explicitly releases it into the public domain. D Monack (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- How is it copyrighted? postdlf (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Everyman_dj.jpg&diff=563788568&oldid=563736393){kind=link}
You're Invited: Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian
[edit]| File:SAAM facade.jpg American Art Museum
|
Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the
Smithsonian American Art Museum You're invited to the Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon, part of a series of edit-a-thons organized by the Smithsonian American Art Museum to add and expand articles about American art and artists on Wikipedia. This event will include a catered lunch and special tours of the Luce Foundation Center for American Art and the Lunder Conservation Center at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. 9:15 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 19, 2013 Capacity is limited, so please sign up today! If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from our distribution list.
Message delivered by Dominic·t 23:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC). |
 Luce Foundation Center
|
Wikimedia DC Meetup
[edit]Dear Fellow Wikipedian in Washington, DC:
I do not know if you know this but on meetup.com there is a group focused on sponsoring meetups for edit-o-thons of Wikipedia called Wikimedia DC. Wikimedia DC is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation. The meetup group is free to join and Wikimedia DC membership is a minimum of $10 per year. I hope to see you at the next meet up. My best regards, Geraldshields11 Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:BensChiliBowl.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
File:BensChiliBowl.jpg missing description details
[edit]is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)I was thinking about some copyediting of James Hampton (artist) but my thought then became that the artwork should be the primary subject, with a section on Hampton in side it. Your opinion? Seyasirt (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have an opinion on the issue. It might be better to ask the question on Talk:James Hampton (artist) where more editors interested in the article will see it. D Monack (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Flag - 2013.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Flag - 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, D Monack. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, D Monack. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, D Monack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, D Monack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)