User talk:DRzon

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 06:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for all the vandalism. I will make helpful contributions instead. Could you also plase put {{indefblockeduser}} on my user page if you decline this request? --DRzon (talk) 06:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Firstly, what edits do you intend to do if unbocked? With the exception of your own vector.js page, I see only page blankings. Secondly, the use of userpage block templates is decided by our admins; a user who asks for it is usually one who shouldn't get it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will only make minor edits, such as spelling, punctuation, and the like. No more blanking of pages by DRzon! --DRzon (talk) 06:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT:@78.26: It's a long story. I noticed the Wikipedia:User pages page which allows me to import orangeBar script into my named account. I created this account so I could test it. I don't know what motivated me to blank all those pages, but whatever it was, it won't happen again. Only minor edits from me. Also, this is my FIRST and ONLY account. --DRzon (talk) 09:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser shows this is not your only account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am considering this unblock request. However, I am curious as to what motivated you to blank all those pages. Also, the fact that you added a vector.js script is not typical behavior for a new user. Do you have any previous (or current) accounts? 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@78.26: Unblock appeal edited. --DRzon (talk) 09:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not concerned about whether or not your edits are minor or not, I am only concerned about whether your edits are productive or not. Can you specify a productive edit you'd like to make, but are not able to do so because you are blocked? (PS, you don't need to edit the unblock request, replying below suffices just fine.) 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@78.26: I would like to fix the grammatical errors in articles such as List of Pororo the Little Penguin characters. --DRzon (talk) 07:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks:, I am inclined to unblock, but I am inviting your input before I do so. Do you have further information I am unaware of? Thanks! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 23:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CU has quite specific information, more important than any behavioral analysis I would give. DMacks (talk) 03:36, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You don't actually think I'm a sockpuppet, do you? Please unblock me! --DRzon (talk) 06:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, per the review of administrators with checkuser permission. You'll need to get your original account unblocked, and use it. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 12:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tell me who I'm a sockpuppet of. --DRzon (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.