User talk:DLS Texas
Welcome
[edit]
|
The article Salvador Flores has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Wikipedia is not a memorial site; nothing listed that indicates this individual meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for a biography.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Fighting Flores Brothers (Texas Revolution)
[edit]
A tag has been placed on The Fighting Flores Brothers (Texas Revolution) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Verbal chat 07:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The article The Fighting Flores Brothers (Texas Revolution) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Sources are all genealogy. No WP:RS at all, and none showing notability or that the claims made are true. Might even be a hoax.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Verbal chat 06:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Flores brothers insertion into Texas Revolution articles
[edit]Hi DLS Texas. I've noticed that you've been inserting mention of the Flores brothers into all sorts of Texas Revolution articles. You've probably noticed that I've been removing these mentions as soon as I see them. Wikipedia articles need to be built based on information found in reliable sources. Scholarly works are considered the most reliable sources. I've done a great deal of reading on the Texas Revolution, and none of the sources mention the Flores brothers. While you can probably find a few sources that do mention them in some way, including them in these articles gives undue weight to them considering that the scholarly sources don't ever mention them when giving an overview of the battles, the revolution in general, or Mexican Texas. Please stop spamming the articles with this information. Karanacs (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, stumbled across this on another errand, and maybe got my dander up a bit; but the above "none of the sources mention the Flores brothers" was not only an unnecessary remark but suggests lack of good sources. I quite honestly grabbed the books closest to me and each one mentioned the Flores brothers. The sister was Juan Seguin's wife, Salvador was Captain of a cavalry unit and a town named after another one of the brothers-- mentioned in Sequin's A Revolution Remembered, Moore's Eighteen Minutes and Savage Frontier, Jenkins' Recollections of Early Texas, and Smithwick's, The Evolution of a State-- need I go to my shelf and grab more?. Maybe not enough for inclusion, but that family is hardly "unmentioned."
- Also, please note that in Texas History, there has been an historical prejudice to mention the wealthy and well-educated and neglect the common folk who played every bit as large, as important, and as heroic a role; and in even in the accounts from such persons, there is a tendency to "name-drop" in their memoirs (e.g., Smithwick). The neglect of Texas heroes with Hispanic surnames is rather a notorious practice. Wikipedia has no page limit, and so opening to valid historic entires, long neglected, seems a fine purpose-- and I'm Scotch-Irish! I would expect to see at least one article on that family in the Handbook of Texas Online.
- Dander smoothed. --cregil (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Runaway Scrape
[edit]I noted your addition of General Vicente Filisola as leading the largest group at San Felipe during the Runaway Scrape on the Texas Revolution article. Santa Anna and Sesma were leading the armies there. I will need to look it up, but I do not believe that Filisola commanded a division at the time, serving instead on Santa Anna's staff. Filisola, however, led the entire Mexican forces in its own retreat after San Jacinto. I'm enjoying your edits-- they often jog my own memory and shake loose a piece of interest to add.--cregil (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Here's the passage written by ALdSA"....I ordered the battalion of regulars of Aldama under command of General Adrian Woll to construct flat boats to facilitate the passage of the division that had remained under the command of General Filisola."
Kemp/Kilman"....the Mexican general proceeded on April 14 on the road to Harrisburg, taking with him about 700 men and one twelve-pounder cannon. Urrea was at Matagorda with 1200 men: Gaona was somewhere between Bastrop and San Felipe, with 725; Sesma, at Fort Bend, with about 1,000, and Vicente Filisola between San Felipe and Fort Bend, with nearly 1800 men."
"Filisola and the main Mexican Army camped at Thompson’s Ferry with 1,408 men. Urrea with 1,165 men left Mrs. Powell’s home at 4 a.m. (April 20) and arrived at Columbia at 4 p.m., which was deserted. He then marched to its port (La Puerta) two miles distance."
"He knew Filisola had approximately 2,500 troops near Old Fort and Santa Anna took the road back to Filisola by way of Harrisburg. His cavalry followed. Without effective leaders the Mexican infantry broke and ran. The Texians crossed the Mexican breastworks in about 18 minutes as the leaderless infantry scattered."
- Yes, I see how you came to that conclusion. However...
- The central vanguard at San Felipe was made up the Brigade under Cos and the Brigade under Sesma, the two together making a Division and that division was led by Santa Anna when Gaona was ordered southeast to meet them and as Gaona did so (painfully slowly by Mexican point of view!). "the main forces of Filisola at San Felipe" is therefore, anachronistic.
- The original text took this all into consideration and was worded accordingly.
- --cregil (talk) 23:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I see what you mean, it really doesn't fit there. Santa Anna was in San Felipe and Filisola was not. I would still like to see a line in about Filisola.
As Santa Anna sped forward, General Filisola would follow with the rear guard, transporting artillery, supplies, and livestock. Santa Anna, ahead of the main forces, would issue orders to Filisola, who would in turn would issue orders to the Generals (in charge of their own forces), thus making it possible for Santa Anna's orders to be carried out.
So in a sense Filisola was in charge of the main forces....right???
Field orders issued April 8 from SA at San Felipe appear to place Filisola in control of the army. Upon reaching the Brazos and in the absence of the supreme commander, now rushing to Harrisburg, Filisola was placed in command of the remaining forces....with these orders: they were supposed to converge at the Brazos, with orders to cross, find, take 500 men and attack and defeat the Texian army and then rendezvous with Santa Anna at Harrisburg. (which didn't happen)DLS Texas (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:BJ_Jones.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BJ_Jones.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 09:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
File:FC_Weinert.jpg
[edit]I have tagged File:FC_Weinert.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 09:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi DLS! I saw that you created Gonzales Ranging Company of Mounted Volunteers recently. There used to be an article for Immortal 32 that's now been redirected to Battle of the Alamo. I think this one needs to be a redirect as well. The company isn't really notable, in my opinion. There isn't that much about the company that isn't in the article (or in Siege of the Alamo). The biggest omission is the list of names, and most of the people on it don't meet inclusion criteria on their own. I'd like to redirect this article. Karanacs (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
If you believe it best, that would be fine.DLS Texas (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to propose a move on this page, but wanted to run it past you first. As far as I can tell, the only thing that distinguishes this from the Peruvian politician Rafael Vásquez is a little accent mark on the first name. And there's Rafael Vásquez (baseball). It can get very confusing in the Search box. I'd like to propose moving the Peruvian politician to Rafael Vásquez (Peruvian politician), and the one you created to Ráfael Vásquez (Mexican Army general). And then a disambiguation page to include all of them. Please let me know how you feel about this. The person who created the Peruvian politican page has been inactive for years. Maile66 (talk) 23:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, sounds okay or Mexican General or just General, any would be fine DLS Texas (talk) 02:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done! Ráfael Vásquez (Mexican general) Thanks for your cooperation. Maile66 (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
[edit]Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:DLS Texas/Ludovic Colquhoun has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ludovic Colquhoun, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. Petan-Bot (talk) 04:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Hi there. I added an infobox and some minor verbiage in the lead. This is the third person I've found who was (according to the Handbook of Texas) called the Paul Revere of Texas. It's a big state - they needed more than one. A word to the wise on this article. Just eyeballing it, I can see where in the future someone will tag it on what WP considers Lists, where you have the names of people who served, etc. Maile66 (talk) 22:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Ludwig Colquhoun
[edit]You picked a tough one. I'm not sure how you found this person, but I don't immediately find anything other than what you have, so it's difficult for me to punch it up. You have a pretty good start on this, but I think you need to do more research. Good luck with this. Maile66 (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
And I don't know the details of why they don't consider this person notable. I do have some tips to give you on this, and any future articles:
- References. If you use the Edit Toolbar when you are in the Edit screen, there are templates that can be filled out for references. If you don't see an Edit Toolbar, go to Preferences, Editing, and check the box "Show Edit Toolbar". Then in the Edit screen, up at top you will see "Cite" . Click that, and over on the left you will then see "Templates". It will help you a lot to standardize and wikify your refrences.
- Notability - I do notice that the guidelines say "If you write an article that doesn't state, at the very beginning, why something is notable, you've significantly increased its roadkill potential." The lead section is supposed to be a synopsis of the rest of the article, something that immediately tells the reader why this subject is notable. That said, I think you need to find more information to fill the article, and punch up the lead section after you have done that.
- Perhaps one clue of Notability is if you click on a red link Ludovic Colquhoun, and when it comes up and tells you that there is no such page (etc.), go ahead anyway to the left-hand side and click on "What links here". If there are already non-user links that indicate other pages that have red links to what you are trying to create, that's an indication someone else thought the subject notable enough to include it on a red link on what they created. In the case of Lucovic, there are no such pages.
- If there are not at least three such non-user red links out there when you create the page, my experience has been that your new page will get slapped by a bot with an "Orphan" tag. I would suggest searching what you consider related pages to see if a reference to Ludovic should be inserted as a red link, and then do it yourself.
- Perhaps one clue of Notability is if you click on a red link Ludovic Colquhoun, and when it comes up and tells you that there is no such page (etc.), go ahead anyway to the left-hand side and click on "What links here". If there are already non-user links that indicate other pages that have red links to what you are trying to create, that's an indication someone else thought the subject notable enough to include it on a red link on what they created. In the case of Lucovic, there are no such pages.
- Cite Find a Grave - Ludwig's grave is Here Find a Grave is a good thing to bookmark. And the template itself, is really a matter of putting it between the ref symbols, and inputing the appropriate information: [1] Check this in your Edit screen to see how I did it. The number in there is the Find a Grave Memorial number found at the bottom of any person's page.
- Google Books A very good place to find information, and good for references.
- Categories: Don't put the colon ahead of the category inside the brackets. The colon is only once, inbetween the word Category, and the name of the category. Inputting the categories with Hot Cat gadgets - after you've created the article - would really help you. Preferences, Gadgets, Editing, check the "Hot Cat" selection. Look at any article, and the categories, if input correctly, should only appear in the category bar at the bottom of the page.
- When you get this done, you can include the existing category for this one: Burials at San Antonio Cemetery No. 1
- Research tools for Texas: Texas State Cemetery Database • Governors of Texas • Political Graveyard • Texas General Land Office • Texas Government Online • Texas Legislature Online
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CharlieEchoTango (contact) 22:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Historic structures in the United States
[edit]:Category:Historic structures in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Matamoros, Tamaulipas
[edit]Hey, thank you for contributing to the Matamoros' involvement in the Texas Revolution. Please feel free to contribute as much as you can. The page is in good need of it. Anyways, thanks again and good job! ComputerJA (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]I thank you for you correction in the article that I published over Gaspar Flores de Abrego. I can edit with an intermediate level of English but my spelling is still very bad in that language. Thanks for making the article easier to read.--Isinbill (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Wikiproject Texas
[edit]I would appreciate it if you would have a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Texas, specifically about the Redesign of the project's main page, and about it joining WikiProject United States. For all intents and purposes, this project has reached a comatose state of involvement. Editors are creating and contributing to Texas articles. But the project site itself has been pretty dead for a long time. Anything you can add to the current discussions on that page would be appreciated. Maile66 (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Timeline of the Texas Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Andrew Jackson Sowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to TN, Guadalupe County, Davidson County, Texas Ranger and Santa Anna
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Gaona's Brigade from Bastrop to San Felipe
[edit]I made a change on the date of General Antonio Gaona's departure from Bastrop (Mina)-- from April 15 to April 5. I am well aware of the lack of specifics available to researchers, but three facts place the date at or near April 5. 1) Noah Smithwick's account of his time with Tumlinson' Rangers in Evolution of a State states that the Rangers witnessed Gaona's Brigade arrive at the Colorado, and then that company of Rangers immediately heads from Bastrop toward the Brazos, arriving on the outskirts of Washington on the Brazos on the night of the full moon, which was April 1st. So we know that Gaona arrived across from Bastrop/Mina on or about March 27. 2) Jose Urrea's Diary states that Gaona had been delayed (for nefarious reasons) in Bastrop for eight days, so we know that after at least one day to cross the river, the occupation lasted eight days, which takes us to approximately the 5th of April. 3) Santa Anna, departs San Felipe frustrated by Gaona's failure to appear, referring to Gaona's Brigade as "lost in the desert;" and Filisola remarks that Gaona arrived in San Felipe on April 17.
Given the weather and lack of available routes for a fully equipped Brigade, an eleven or twelve day march is about right-- whereas a two day march (the April 15 date) is impossible.
From a April 7 dispatch from Rusk and Houston to Major Williamson, we know that, out of Washington on the Brazos, Ranger scouts had captured at least two Mexican scouts on April 6, suggesting that Gaona's Brigade probably continued on the San Antonio Road to the Brazos and then picked its way down the right bank of the river toward San Felipe. At the expected 12 miles per day march, that is, at best, a ten day journey.--cregil (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)instructions]]. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[1]
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited List of birds of South Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Saffold Dam Marker
[edit]Saffold Dam is located on SH 123 on the south edge of Seguin, Texas with the northern edge bordering Max Starke Park. The dam was named for Civil War veteran William Saffold, whose father purchased the property here in the mid-1800s from San Jacinto veteran Manuel N. Flores. The Flores Falls were originally a natural rock outcropping, Saffold Dam was a mill dam, typical of the styles built during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The dam was first improved by Henry Troell in the late 1800s. Troell added rocks to heighten the dam, raising the water level in order to power a cotton gin. In 1907, the City of Seguin bought Troell's property to further develop the river's hydroelectricity, and later improvements led to the establishment of a hydroelectric plant on the dam's south side. The plant is currently nonoperational and a restaurant complex is under development.
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Henry Karnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Flores De Abrego.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flores De Abrego.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Andrew Jackson Sowell for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Jackson Sowell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Jackson Sowell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Karanacs (talk) 19:24, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Roland Harper
[edit]I saw your edit[2] to his article here. For future reference, a person isn't put in both the category and subcategory for where they are from. For example, if you checked the category People from El Paso, Texas and its people category People from El Paso County, Texas, notable people aren't in both. So Harper only goes in the People from Seguin, Texas and I edited out the link to People from Guadalupe County, Texas....William 22:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Category:Mayors of Seguin, Texas
[edit]Category:Mayors of Seguin, Texas, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 11:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
File:José de Urrea.jpg missing description details
[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Your submission at AfC Simón de Herrera was accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)- I think this is already close to a B-class article-- I marked it as C class since I imagine there's more info that could be covered in the future. (Apologies if not, I'm a first time reviewer.) Do you know about the new Draft namespace? This might be a good place for creating drafts in the future, there's a blog post about it. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Colonial and Mexican Governors of Texas
[edit]Hello!
Thanks for your contributions in the articles about Texas history! I wanted to ask you if you would want to publish some article of colonial governors of Texas (List of Colonial and Mexican Governors of Texas). I think all (or most) them should have articles in Wikipedia because they were governors of this place. So, I posted many of them because before there was almost no colonial governor of Texas who had articles on wikipedia and I am interested in this theme. I was wondering if you wanted to help me by publishing some of them. Thank you.--Isinbill (talk) 19:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, DLS Texas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article List of birds of South Texas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
(1) The page has no sources listed for either the list or its taxonomy (2) The region it applies to has no particular political or biogeographic significance (3) The list is arranged alphabetically by Family, a radically different arrangement from nearly all other lists of birds (4) Even if every other objection were fixed, it's far from a complete list
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DLS Texas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DLS Texas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DLS Texas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saffold Dam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manuel Flores (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:José de Urrea.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Henry Katz and Company moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Henry Katz and Company. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. #prodraxis connect 15:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Katz and Company (September 13)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Katz and Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, DLS Texas!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 02:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Henry Katz and Company
[edit]
Hello, DLS Texas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Henry Katz and Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Katz and Company (July 20)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Katz and Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.